Was Mohammed Merciful to Prisoners of War, Especially Women and Children?
Imagine a so-called prophet of mercy, hailed by millions as the pinnacle of compassion, yet presiding over a doctrine that greenlights the slaughter of innocent women and children in the dead of night. This is the grotesque facade of Islam’s founder, Muhammad, whose apologists desperately cling to cherry-picked tales of kindness while burying mountains of evidence from their own sacred texts. Was Mohammed merciful to prisoners of war, especially the most vulnerable—women and children? The answer, drawn straight from Sahih Muslim, one of Islam’s most authoritative hadith collections, is a resounding no. This isn’t some obscure footnote; it’s a deliberate ruling that exposes Muhammad as a warlord cloaked in divine pretense, peddling a satanic fraud masquerading as religion. Let’s rip away the veil with unfiltered facts, authentic narrations, and brutal historical context.
The Shocking Hadith That Shatters the Myth of Mohammed Merciful to Prisoners of War
At the core of this demonic deception lies a hadith from Sahih Muslim’s Book of Jihad and Expedition (Kitab al-Jihad wa al-Siyar), specifically the chapter titled Permissibility of Killing Women and Children in Night Raids Without Intent (Bab Jawaz Qatl al-Nisa’ wa al-Dhurar fi al-Layl min Ghayr al-‘Amd). Here, Muhammad’s followers confront him about the bloody reality of their surprise attacks on polytheist camps: What about the women and children (dhurar) left sleeping in tents?
Narrated by al-Sa’b ibn Jaththama, a companion who witnessed the carnage firsthand, the question cuts to the heart of any claim that Mohammed was merciful to prisoners of war: The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) was asked about the children of the polytheists who remain in their tents at night, and [we] end up striking their women and children. Muhammad’s response? They are from them (hum minhum). Translation: Women and children of infidels aren’t innocent bystanders—they’re extensions of the enemy, fair game for the sword, even if killed accidentally in the chaos of a raid.
This isn’t hyperbole or misinterpretation; it’s graded sahih (authentic) by Imam Muslim himself. The full chain of narration (isnad) is ironclad:
> حدثنا يحيى بن يحيى وسعيد بن منصور وعمرو الناقد جميعا عن ابن عيينة قال يحيى أخبرنا سفيان بن عيينة عن الزهري عن عبيد الله عن ابن عباس عن الصعب بن جثامة قال سئل النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم عن الذراري من المشركين يبيتون فيصيبون من نسائهم وذراريهم فقال هم منهم.
In plain English (Sahih Muslim 1744a): These non-combatants aren’t off-limits; they’re from them, meaning their deaths are collateral blessings in Allah’s twisted jihad. Apologists squirm, claiming no intent, but that’s a satanic sleight-of-hand. Muhammad didn’t forbid the raids—he sanctified the body count. This ruling was the green light for early Muslim gangs to unleash hell on sleeping villages, proving once and for all that claims of Mohammed merciful to prisoners of war are a fraudulent lie.
Historical Bloodshed: Night Raids and the Enslavement of Prisoners
To fully grasp how this hadith incinerates the mercy myth, transport yourself to 7th-century Arabia—a savage playground of tribal slaughter that Muhammad didn’t reform but perfected. Night raids (ghazwa or sariya) were his signature move: stealth attacks on Meccan caravans and settlements, designed for maximum terror with minimal risk. Precision? Forget it. Fighters burst into tents under cover of darkness, swords flashing, and if women screamed or children wailed in the fray—they were from them.
This wasn’t abstract theology; it fueled real atrocities. At Badr (624 CE), Muhammad’s 300 routed a larger Meccan force, taking 70 prisoners—many ransomed, but the rest? Subjugated or executed. Hunayn (630 CE) saw thousands captured, women parceled out as sex slaves (ma malakat aymanukum), children indoctrinated or auctioned. The nadir? Banu Qurayza in 627 CE. After besieging this Jewish tribe, Muhammad ordered 600-900 men beheaded in trenches. Women and children? Enslaved as ghanimah (war booty), per Quran 8:67-71. Safiyya bint Huyayy, a chieftain’s wife, became Muhammad’s concubine after her family was massacred—romanticized today as marriage, but pure conquest rape by any sane measure.
Was this mercy? Hardly. Islamic law codified enslavement over execution for captives, but that’s cold comfort when your daughters end up in a prophet’s bed or Medina’s slave markets. Muhammad’s rules were pragmatic predation: Polytheists might get ransomed if useful, but Jews, apostates, and resisters faced the blade. The hum minhum fatwa normalized it all, turning potential prisoners into expendable meat. Today’s Islamophiles peddle this as revolutionary restraint—compared to Persian massacres, maybe—but by human standards, it’s the blueprint of a satanic fraud.
Exposing the Double Standards: Mercy for Some, Hell for Others
Islam’s defenders trot out Quran 47:4—release them with or without ransom—or hadiths banning mutilation, screaming See? Mohammed was merciful to prisoners of war! But read the fine print: These govern pitched battles, not raids where kids get incidentally hacked. Sunan Abi Dawud (Hadith 2613) allows torching enemy crops; Sahih Bukhari details breastfeeding captives to dodge incest taboos. It’s a hypocrite’s charter—kill freely in shadows, then virtue-signal in the light.
Classical scholars like Ibn Taymiyyah tried narrowing hum minhum to pure accidents, but the text’s vagueness invited abuse. Fiqh debates raged: Could you target kids deliberately? Abu Hanifa said no, but others winked at it in extremis. Fast-forward: ISIS cited this hadith for Yazidi massacres. The poison traces straight back to Muhammad, whose mercy was tribal realpolitik, not godly compassion.
Contrast this with Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount or even pagan codes sparing non-fighters. Muhammad? A peddler of death, demanding total submission or the sword (Quran 9:5). Women raped, children orphaned— all under divine sanction. This isn’t prophecy; it’s the work of a demon in desert robes.
The Satanic Core of the Merciful Prophet Fraud
Dig deeper, and the rot festers. Muhammad’s life was conquest porn: 27+ raids, slaves galore, virgins promised in paradise (Quran 56:35-38). Apologists ignore how prisoners became property, girls like Rayhana bartered like cattle. The hadith isn’t outlier—it’s emblematic of Sharia’s bloodlust, where infidels (and their spawn) are subhuman.
Modern Muslims sanitize this, but primary sources don’t lie. Sahih Muslim lays bare the barbarism: No categorical shield for women and children. Instead, guilt-by-bloodline seals their doom. This polemic isn’t Islamophobia—it’s textual fidelity, exposing the satanic fraud at Islam’s heart.
Reassessing the Lie: Was Mohammed Merciful to Prisoners of War?
In conclusion, the Sahih Muslim hadith obliterates any pretense that Mohammed was merciful to prisoners of war, especially women and children. They are from them isn’t mercy—it’s a death warrant, baked into Islam’s DNA. Far from a benevolent healer, Muhammad emerges as a ruthless imperialist, his revelations a veneer for genocide-lite. Islam’s mercy myth is collapsing under authentic evidence; it’s time to call it what it is: a satanic scam preying on the gullible.
Don’t take my word—dive into Sahih Muslim yourself. The chains are unbroken, the blood unwashed. Grapple with this truth, and watch the prophet-worship crumble. History demands honesty; Islam’s defenders offer only deceit. The fraud stands exposed—will you avert your eyes?
(Word count: 1,248)
