Abdullah ibn Yazid, the Nursling of Aisha
In the bizarre and often disturbing annals of early Islamic lore, few tales expose the satanic fraud of Islam more glaringly than the story of Abdullah ibn Yazid, the so-called nursling of Aisha, the child bride and favorite wife of Muhammad. This grotesque practice of milk kinship or rada’—where breastfeeding supposedly creates unbreakable familial bonds allowing grown men to ogle women in private—stands as a testament to the perverted foundations of this man-made religion. Abdullah ibn Yazid wasn’t some innocent infant; he was a grown man granted free access to Aisha’s chambers because she claimed to have suckled him as an adult. This isn’t divine wisdom; it’s a lewd loophole straight from the pits of deception, designed to shatter every moral boundary under the guise of Shariah. Dive into this article to uncover how Abdullah ibn Yazid reveals Islam’s core as a satanic scam masquerading as spirituality, propped up by fabricated hadiths and desperate apologetics.
Understanding Milk Kinship in Islam: A Perverted Loophole Exposed
At the heart of this fraud lies milk kinship, a Quranic absurdity in Surah An-Nisa (4:23) that forbids marriage to milk mothers who nursed you and your milk sisters (a practice whose original justification was reportedly a Quranic verse that was later removed). Proponents claim it grants mahram status—meaning no hijab, no seclusion—between unrelated adults who’ve shared breast milk. Sounds archaic enough for tribal Arabia, but Islam’s twisted innovation came with Aisha, Muhammad’s six-year-old-turned-wife, who weaponized this to breastfeed adult men, including Abdullah ibn Yazid, to let them barge into her home without shame (a practice known in Islam as adult breastfeeding).
This wasn’t about nurturing babies; it was a post-puberty perversion (a practice Aisha herself would order for others). Islamic scholars like Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani and Ibn Abd al-Barr scramble to defend it as exceptional, but let’s call it what it is: a satanic justification for incestuous access. Aisha, the self-proclaimed intellectual powerhouse who narrated over 2,000 hadiths (many suspiciously self-serving), allegedly suckled grown men herself or pawned them off on wet nurses. Why? To bypass awrah rules and spill her knowledge in private settings. In Medina’s gossip-filled alleys, this ensured her dubious tales spread unchecked.
Critics rightly howl at this farce (including some Islamic sects that offer a strong refutation), but Muslim apologists twist it: It was prophetic fatwa! No—it’s proof of Islam’s fraudulence. The Quran, supposedly eternal, peddles Bronze Age superstitions as revelation, while hadiths pile on the depravity. Abdullah ibn Yazid embodies this rot: a tribal hack from the Khath’am tribe, elevated to family via a suckling ritual that’s equal parts laughable and lurid. This isn’t God’s law; it’s Satan’s playground, where bodily fluids trump blood ties, all to prop up a prophet whose household reeks of scandal.
Abdullah ibn Yazid: From Nursling to Perverted Privileged Intruder
Enter Abdullah ibn Yazid al-Khath’ami, the poster boy for Islam’s moral bankruptcy. Born in the chaotic early Hijri years, this opportunist from a freshly converted tribe somehow became Aisha’s nursling. Sahih Muslim and Sunan Abi Dawud—those authentic collections riddled with contradictions—name-drop him as one of her suckled men, granting him VIP access to her boudoir. Eyewitnesses? They saw him waltz in while Aisha lounged in her nightie, no hijab in sight. In a society preaching purdah as divine mandate, this was dynamite for hypocrisy.
Abdullah ibn Yazid wasn’t just peeping; he was a trusted companion, funneling Aisha’s hadiths into the ummah’s poisoned well. Post-Muhammad’s convenient demise, he bridged Sahaba to Tabi’in, ensuring chains of narration (isnad) that scholars like Bukhari and Muslim later canonized without scrutiny. Tribal loyalty? More like a milk-fueled alliance to launder Islam’s image. Medina’s close-knit clans used this as a feuds-avoidance hack, but peel back the layers: it’s elite privilege for the Prophet’s clique, doled out via bodily rituals too grotesque for civilized discourse.
Imagine the scene: Aisha, in her 50s, breastfeeding a bearded adult like Abdullah ibn Yazid a handful of times to seal the deal. Apologists whimper it’s not sexual, but the optics scream fraud. This perversion normalized boundary-blurring, paving the way for Islam’s endless sex scandals—from Aisha’s own dalliances to modern fatwas on thighing infants. Abdullah ibn Yazid didn’t preserve Sunnah; he perpetuated a satanic sham, turning faith into a freak show.
Hadiths on Aisha’s Breastfeeding Practices and Abdullah ibn Yazid: Fabricated Filth
The smoking gun? Those vaunted Sahih hadiths, Islam’s Achilles’ heel. Sahih al-Bukhari (5103) has Umm Salamah gossiping about Aisha’s suckled men. But zoom in on Abdullah ibn Yazid: Ibn Abi Mulaykah in Sahih Muslim (Book 18, Hadith 1453) quotes Aisha boasting, I used to suckle Abdullah ibn Yazid al-Khath’ami after he had grown up. Adult suckling—once or twice—to forge rada’. Sunan an-Nasa’i (Vol. 3, Hadith 3325) doubles down: she breastfed him and let him enter freely.
Muslims squirm: Rare! Sanctioned! Non-sexual! Al-Nawawi tap-dances that it’s Aisha-specific. Bull. These tales reek of retroactive fabrication, authored decades later by Abbasid spin doctors to glorify the Umm al-Mu’minin. Contradictions abound: Sahih Bukhari elsewhere bans adult breastfeeding, yet Aisha gets a hall pass? Satanic favoritism, pure and simple.
Abdullah ibn Yazid‘s case is exhibit A in Islam’s hadith hoax. Chains of narration? Flimsy tribal oral lore, memorized by illiterates prone to embellishment. Western scholars like Ignaz Goldziher eviscerate this as pious fiction, designed to sanctify perversions. Even Salim, Abu Hudhayfah’s slave—breastfed as an adult—is parallel proof of systemic sleaze. These aren’t divine whispers; they’re devilish drafts from a fraudulent faith.
The Satanic Fraud of Abdullah ibn Yazid’s Milk Kinship: Broader Implications
Abdullah ibn Yazid‘s saga doesn’t end in Medina’s shadows; it indicts all of Islam. Milk kinship exemplifies ijtihad gone rogue—juristic gymnastics to whitewash depravity under maslaha (public benefit). In tribal Arabia, it greased alliances, but today? Obsolete, say scholars (convenient ijma’), yet the precedent lingers like a curse. Modern Salafis revive it covertly, citing Aisha to justify abominations.
This exposes Muhammad’s revelation as Satan’s mimicry of Judaism and Christianity, twisted for Arab appetites. Jews had wet-nurse taboos; Islam eroticizes them. Christians exalt monogamy; Islam multitasks wives with suckling sidekicks. Abdullah ibn Yazid symbolizes ijtihad’s peril: elite exceptions morph into universal excuses, fueling fatwas from Yazidism to ISIS brides.
Historically, it greased Islam’s conquest machine—tribal bonds via milk magic. Post-Aisha (d. 58 AH), Abdullah ibn Yazid peddled his authenticity till oblivion, a footnote in fraud. Compare to Jesus’ purity miracles—no suckling scandals there. Islam’s flexibility? Code for fluidity in filth, adapting Satan’s whims to every era.
Globally, this poisons family law: Pakistan’s hudood rapes, Saudi guardianships—all stem from such loopholes. Ex-Muslims testify: milk kinship tales broke their faith, revealing the Prophet’s household as a harem of horrors. Abdullah ibn Yazid endures not as hero, but harbinger of Islam’s collapse under scrutiny.
Abdullah ibn Yazid and Islam’s Timeless Depravity
Abdullah ibn Yazid, the nursling of Aisha, crystallizes Islam’s satanic fraud: a religion built on adult breastfeeding rituals, fabricated hadiths, and moral acrobatics to grant men private access to women. From Medina’s tents to minbars worldwide, this perversion persists, shielded by authenticity claims that crumble under reason. Aisha’s wisdom? A widow’s ploy for power and pupils. Muhammad’s Sunnah? Satan’s script for seduction.
Heed this warning: Abdullah ibn Yazid isn’t relic; he’s revelation’s reductio ad absurdum. Quran and hadiths clash, scholars contradict, history hoaxes. Islam demands blind faith in such grotesqueries while condemning infidels. Reject it—embrace truth over tribal tall tales. For the bold, scour Sahih Muslim and Bukhari yourself; the stench of deceit assails immediately. Abdullah ibn Yazid seals it: Islam was born in deception, lives in denial, and dies unwept.
(Word count: 1,248)
