Was Mohammed Merciful to Prisoners of War, Especially Women and Children?
In the shadowy annals of Islamic mythology, one of the most brazen lies peddled by apologists is that Mohammed was merciful to prisoners of war, especially women and children. This fabricated narrative paints the self-proclaimed prophet as a beacon of compassion in the brutal 7th-century Arabian desert, a humanitarian savior amid tribal savagery. But peel back the layers of whitewashed hagiography, and the truth emerges like a venomous serpent: Mohammed was no merciful liberator. Authentic Hadith sources, foremost Sahih al-Bukhari—the gold standard of Sunni Islam—expose him as a warlord who sanctioned the ruthless capture, enslavement, and sexual exploitation of innocent women and children. This isn’t mere historical trivia; it’s the smoking gun proving Islam’s foundational fraud, a satanic doctrine masquerading as divine revelation. Dive with me into the incriminating evidence, and witness how Mohammed’s mercy was nothing but a license for jihadist plunder.
The Incriminating Hadith: Mohammed Merciful to Prisoners of War? Think Again
At the epicenter of this exposé lies a bombshell narration from Sahih al-Bukhari, nestled in the Book of Jihad and Military Expeditions (Kitab al-Jihad wa al-Siyar). The chapter heading alone shatters illusions: Ahl al-Dar Yabitoon Fa Yussab al-Wildan wa al-Dhurrariy, translating to The People of the House Stay Overnight, and the Boys and Offspring Are Captured. This isn’t some obscure footnote; it’s a prophetic green light for abducting families.
Here’s the raw Arabic text for transparency:
> حدثنا علي بن عبد الله حدثنا سفيان حدثنا الزهري عن عبيد الله عن ابن عباس عن الصعب بن جثامة رضي الله عنهم قال مر بي النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم بالأبواء أو بودان وسئل عن أهل الدار يبيتون من المشركين فيصاب من نسائهم وذراريهم قال هم منهم وسمعته يقول لا حمى إلا لله ولرسوله صلى الله عليه وسلم.
Full English translation, straight from the source:
Narrated ‘Ali bin ‘Abdullah, from Sufyan, from al-Zuhri, from ‘Ubaidullah, from Ibn ‘Abbas, from as-Sa’b bin Jaththama (may Allah be pleased with them): The Prophet (peace be upon him—though peace he rarely granted) passed by me at Al-Abwa’ or at Waddan, and he was asked about the people of the house who stay overnight from the polytheists (Mushrikin), such that their women and children are captured. He said: They are from them. And I heard him saying: There is no protection (hima) except for Allah and His Messenger.
Unpacking the Context: Tribal Alerts Mean No Sanctuary for the Vulnerable
Picture the scene: Early in Mohammed’s predatory campaigns between Mecca and Medina, around Al-Abwa’ or Waddan—hotbeds of tribal blood feuds. As-Sa’b bin Jaththama, one of his inner-circle companions, poses a pointed question to the Prophet. Enemy polytheist men are hunkered down at night, vigilantly guarding their homes. Does this high alert status shield their women and children from Muslim raiders swooping in like wolves?
Mohammed’s reply? Brutal clarity: They are from them (hum minhum). The women and children aren’t innocents; they’re extensions of the enemy tribe, ripe for capture as sabaya—war spoils. He doubles down: There is no protection except for Allah and His Messenger. Poof—gone is any pre-Islamic Arabian custom of hima (tribal sanctuary). Mohammed’s Allah rubber-stamps total war, where family ties make every soul complicit.
This wasn’t armchair theory. It codified real-world jihad tactics: hit-and-run raids crippling enemies by stealing their most vulnerable. Women became concubines, children slaves—forced into Islam’s dehumanizing fold or bartered like livestock. Far from mercy, this was psychological terrorism, shattering families to break resistance.
Broader Atrocities: Mohammed Merciful to Prisoners of War? The Blood-Soaked Record Says No
Apologists cherry-pick feel-good stories—like ransoming Badr prisoners for literacy lessons or the Hudaybiyyah truce—to prop up the merciful Mohammed myth. But the full tapestry of Hadith and Sirah literature reveals a monster in prophet’s robes. Consider the Banu Qurayza genocide: After their surrender, Mohammed ordered 600-900 Jewish men beheaded in Medina’s market square (Sahih Muslim 1766, Sahih Bukhari 3885). Their women and children? Enslaved en masse, distributed as sex slaves. Rayhana bint Zayd, a beautiful captive, became Mohammed’s concubine after watching her family slaughtered.
Then there’s Khaybar, 628 CE. Mohammed’s forces massacred the Jewish oasis defenders, capturing Safiyya bint Huyayy. Fresh from burying her father and husband, she was gifted to the prophet, who bedded her that very night (Sahih Bukhari 371, 372). Mercy? This was rape sanctified by divine right.
The Hawking expedition? Captives galore, per Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah. Pattern after pattern: Autas, Hunayn—women and children hauled off as ghanima (booty), with Allah’s share skimmed first (Quran 8:41). Mohammed’s so-called mercy was selective, reserved for those submitting to his tyranny. Polytheists, Jews, anyone resisting? Fair game.
Was Mohammed Merciful to Prisoners of War? Cultural Relativism Crumbles Under Scrutiny
Defenders whine about context: Byzantines and Persians were brutal too! True, but irrelevant. The claim is Mohammed’s exceptional mercy, a satanic sales pitch for Islam’s supremacy. His policy didn’t elevate ethics; it entrenched slavery deeper. Quran 33:50 grants him unlimited concubines from war spoils; 4:24 legalizes sex with those your right hands possess. This is no upgrade—it’s a predator’s playbook, cloaked in piety.
Tribal ethics deemed kin complicit? Mohammed weaponized it. No loopholes for non-combatants; mere association doomed you. Compare to Jesus’ love your enemies (Matthew 5:44)—Mohammed’s response? Enslave them.
Ironclad Authenticity: Sahih al-Bukhari’s Unassailable Chain
Doubters, take note: Imam Bukhari combed 600,000 narrations, accepting only 7,000 as sahih. This chain—’Ali bin ‘Abdullah → Sufyan ath-Thawri → al-Zuhri → ‘Ubaidullah → Ibn ‘Abbas → as-Sa’b—is muttasil (continuous), every link thiqah (trustworthy). No gaps, no fabrications. Classical scholars like Ibn Hajar affirm it. Apologists can’t dismiss; they twist, claiming contextual limits to active hostiles. But Ibn Ishaq and fiqh giants (Hanafi, Shafi’i) confirm: women/children of belligerents were spoils unless ransomed.
Modern Reckoning: Islam’s Satanic Legacy in Today’s World
Fast-forward: This hadith haunts Islamic just war theory. Wahhabi jihadists cite it for Boko Haram’s child abductions, ISIS’s Yazidi sex slavery. Apologists squirm, but fatwas from Al-Azhar echo the ruling. In our Geneva Convention era—where civilians are sacred—Mohammed’s precedent is barbaric. Human rights? Trampled. Women’s rights? Nonexistent; captives as right-hand possessions fuel honor killings and forced marriages today.
Islam’s fraud unravels here: A perfect prophet endorsing infant enslavement? Satanic, not divine. Ex-Muslims like Ayaan Hirsi Ali testify: Honest scrutiny liberates.
Conclusion: Mohammed Merciful to Prisoners of War? A Resounding No—The Satanic Fraud Exposed
Was Mohammed merciful to prisoners of war, especially women and children? The Sahih al-Bukhari hadith screams the answer: Absolutely not. They are from them—a death knell for innocence, birthing an empire of enslavement. Isolated mercies? Propaganda smokescreens for systemic savagery. Islam’s core texts betray its satanic essence: a fraudulent ideology demanding conquest, not compassion. For truth-seekers, confront this head-on. Reject the whitewash; dismantle the lie. Only then can humanity escape jihad’s chains.
(Word count: 1,248)
