Questions about the Quran’s Preservation
The grandiose claim that the Quran’s preservation is flawless and divinely guaranteed stands as the rotten pillar propping up the entire fraudulent edifice of Islam. Muslims parrot verses like Quran 15:9, boasting of Allah’s solemn promise to protect the book from corruption. But peel back the veil of this pious pretense, and what do you find? A cesspool of contradictions straight from Islam’s own infallible sources—Sahih Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, and other Sahaba narrations. These aren’t wild conspiracy theories from Islamophobes; they’re admissions from Muhammad’s closest cronies: Umar, Aisha, Ibn Abbas, Ibn Mas’ud. They expose Quran’s preservation as a monumental hoax, riddled with lost verses, eaten parchments, disputed surahs, and editorial butchery under Caliph Uthman. This isn’t divine safeguarding—it’s satanic sleight-of-hand, a deliberate deception to foist a corrupted text as eternal truth. Dive into these six damning evidences, and watch the myth of Quran’s preservation crumble like the house of cards it is.
The Stoning Verse: Exposing the First Crack in Quran’s Preservation
Kick off the demolition of Quran’s preservation with the infamous stoning verse—a brutal punishment for adultery that Umar ibn al-Khattab, Islam’s second rightly guided caliph, publicly mourned as missing from the Quran. In Sahih Muslim (Book 16, Hadith 4194), Umar doesn’t whisper; he thunders from the pulpit: Allah sent Muhammad with the Truth and revealed the Book to him. Among what was revealed was the verse of stoning… We recited it, understood it, and acted upon it. Yet, poof—it’s gone from the modern Quran. Umar whines that he wishes it were still there but clings to its ruling anyway, like a man clutching a phantom limb.
This isn’t a minor glitch; it’s a gaping wound in Quran’s preservation. A hudud law—core to Sharia’s barbaric justice—vanishes? Muslims squirm with abrogation excuses (naskh), claiming the ruling survives orally while the text gets scrubbed. But if Allah promised perfect protection, who dared edit His words? Human hands, that’s who—Uthman’s cronies playing god. This satanic fraud reveals Islam’s text as malleable putty, molded to political whims, not immutable divine decree.
The Goat That Devoured Quran’s Preservation: Aisha’s Shocking Revelation
If Umar’s confession wasn’t humiliating enough, enter Aisha, Muhammad’s child bride and alleged Mother of the Believers. In Sunan Ibn Majah (Vol. 3, Hadith 1944) and Musnad Ahmad, she drops a bombshell: a goat (or sheep—take your pick of barnyard culprits) chomped the parchment holding the stoning verse and the adult suckling verse, stashed under her bed. Casual storage for eternally preserved revelation? These gems weren’t in Uthman’s final cut, proving Quran’s preservation was as reliable as a paper towel in a hurricane.
Apologists bleat abrogation again, but Aisha’s tale screams vulnerability. No master copies, just scraps in bedrooms—prime for loss, theft, or munching. This farce underscores Islam’s primitive transmission: oral mush, fragile hides, no backups. How does a perfectly preserved book lose chunks to livestock? It’s laughable, if not for the sinister implications. Satan’s perfect setup: a holy book so fragile it needs miracles to survive, yet Muslims deny the miracles of its repeated near-deaths.
Breastfeeding an Adult: The Creepy Verse Vanished from Quran’s Preservation
Aisha doubles down on the absurd with the ten sucklings verse (Sahih Muslim, Book 17, Hadith 1421-1422). This gem supposedly let a woman breastfeed a grown man ten times to foster a maternal bond, making him mahram for unchaperoned hangs. Revealed, recited, then abrogated to five sucklings—yet neither lurks in today’s Quran. Aisha snaps at Ibn Abbas: You recite only what suits the people’s desires! Internal catfights among infallible companions? Check.
This exposes Quran’s preservation as a selective memory game. Abrogation didn’t just tweak laws; it erased text wholesale, leaving Muslims to debate what was ever there. Aisha’s rage hints at deeper rifts—companions hoarding authentic versions while Uthman steamrolls dissent. Islam’s pure scripture? More like a censored fanfic, doctored to hide Muhammad’s weirder whims. Satanic genius: bury the bizarre, sell the sanitized.
Surah Al-Ahzab’s Mysterious Shrinkage: A Catastrophe for Quran’s Preservation
Ibn Abbas, the Prophet’s cousin and Quran expert, delivers the knockout: Surah Al-Ahzab (Chapter 33) once rivaled Al-Baqarah’s 286 verses—or at least hit 200—but now whimpers at 73 (Sunan at-Tirmidhi, Hadith 3205; Tafsir al-Tabari). It used to be read in one thousand verses during the Prophet’s time, he wails, but Uthman reduced it. Over a hundred verses poofed? Where’d they go—divine delete key?
This obliterates Quran’s preservation. Ibn Abbas, no lightweight, accuses Uthman of textual amputation. Lost in war? Abrogated into oblivion? Or cherry-picked for convenience? Muslims dodge with recitation variants, but facts scream editorial massacre. Allah’s protected word, halved by bureaucrats? That’s not preservation; it’s desecration—a satanic plot to peddle a truncated fraud as flawless.
Companion Codices: The Rebellion Against Quran’s Preservation
Quran’s preservation hits rock bottom with the Sahaba’s rogue mushafs. Ubayy ibn Ka’b, top reciter, packed extras: Surahs Al-Hafd and Al-Khal’, longer than Fatiha, recited by Muhammad himself (al-Durr al-Manthur). Excluded? Yep. Ibn Mas’ud’s codex ditched Fatiha, Falaq, and Nas entirely, calling them prayers, not Quran (Tahdhib al-Asma wal-Lughat; Kitab al-Masahif). He boasted 70+ surahs straight from the Prophet’s lips and burned Uthman’s copies in defiance.
Elite memorizers—Prophet-approved—peddling rival Qurans? Uthman burned variants to enforce his version, sparking riots. This anarchy shreds Quran’s preservation: no consensus canon till brute force. Satan’s masterstroke: let companions bicker, then crown one mutilated text as the Quran. Islam’s unity? Built on pyres of discarded scripture.
Ibn Mas’ud’s Defiant Stand: The Final Nail in Quran’s Preservation
Zoom in on Ibn Mas’ud, Kufa’s Quran guru. His mushaf excluded Mu’awwidhatayn (113-114) as incantations, not core text. He refused Uthman’s mushaf, scorning the Mu’awwidhatayn in prayer: No surah like ‘Say: He is Allah, the One’ (Ibn Abi Dawud). Widely used, yet demonized as non-Quranic?
This titan of tradition laughed at standardization. If Quran’s preservation was divine fact, why the heresy from insiders? Uthman’s coup silenced him, but his ghost haunts the lie. Satanic fraud exposed: Islam’s book is a consensus construct, not God’s verbatim voice.
The Satanic Fraud Unveiled: Why Quran’s Preservation Is a Dangerous Myth
These aren’t dusty forgeries—they’re Sunni orthodoxy’s crown jewels, screaming Quran’s preservation is balderdash. Goat-munched verses, shrunken surahs, rebel codices: a comedy of errors masked as miracle. Uthman’s success was tyranny, not triumph—burning evidence to birth the pure text. Umar’s regrets, Aisha’s gripes, Abbas’s laments, Mas’ud’s fire: companions indict their own perfect process.
Islam’s house crashes without this mirage. No flawless Quran? No final prophet; just a satanic scam chaining billions to lies, stonings, and suckling absurdities. Muslims, face facts: your eternal book is a human hash, corrupted from cradle. Quran’s preservation? The biggest con in history. Time to burn this myth and seek truth beyond the deception. (Word count: 1,247)
