He Orders the Killing of Women and Children
Imagine a so-called prophet of God casually endorsing the slaughter of innocent women and children in the dead of night. This isn’t some ancient myth or fictional horror story—it’s straight from the most authentic Islamic hadiths in Sahih Muslim and Sahih al-Bukhari. He orders the killing of women and children, and the world is supposed to revere him as Muhammad, the mercy to mankind? What a grotesque fraud. These texts expose Islam not as a religion of peace, but as a satanic blueprint for barbarism, masquerading as divine wisdom. In this article, we’ll rip open the veil of apologetics, dissect the hadiths on the killing of women and children, and reveal how this 7th-century warlord’s bloodlust continues to poison minds today. Far from contextual excuses, these narrations scream moral depravity—a satanic deception that demands the killing of innocents under the guise of jihad.
The Satanic Roots: Historical Context of Muhammad’s Blood-Soaked Jihad
In the brutal tribal wastelands of 7th-century Arabia, Muhammad wasn’t spreading love; he was building an empire through relentless raids and massacres. Facing aggression from Meccan polytheists and Jewish tribes like Banu Nadir? Please—that’s the spin. These were opportunistic conquests to consolidate power, where Muhammad’s jihad expeditions (ghazawat) turned night raids into slaughterhouses. Women and children, huddled in enemy camps, became collateral damage—or worse, legitimate targets in the fog of war.
Take the Banu Nadir siege around 625 CE. Accused of plotting against him (sound familiar? Every opponent was a conspirator), Muhammad besieged their forts, then ordered the burning of their palm groves—their very livelihood. The Quran itself (59:5) rubber-stamps this eco-terror: Whatever palm-trees you cut down or left standing upon their roots, it was by the leave of Allah. Divine permission for scorched-earth tactics? That’s not God; that’s the devil whispering conquest. And when night fell, the killing of women and children wasn’t a tragic accident—it was policy, as we’ll see. This wasn’t unique to Arabs; Romans and Persians did it too, but Muhammad claimed angelic revelations elevating savagery to sanctity. What a satanic scam, turning tribal thuggery into eternal truth.
Sahih Muslim Exposes the Horror: They Are From Them – Endorsing the Killing of Women and Children
The crown jewel of Islamic depravity sits in Sahih Muslim, the second-most trusted hadith collection. Under the brazen chapter The Permissibility of Killing Women and Children in Night Raids Without Deliberate Intent, a companion asks Muhammad directly:
> Narrated … that the Prophet (peace be upon him) was asked about the polytheists who are attacked at night and some of their women and children are struck (killed). He said: “They are from them.”
They are from them. Four chilling words that greenlight massacring families. No remorse, no oops, just cold ratification. Imam Nawawi, a medieval scholar, twists it as incidental harm, but let’s call spade a spade: Muhammad didn’t forbid it; he approved it. In enemy strongholds where families bunkered together, this meant slashing through women and kids without batting an eye. Apologists whine about no deliberate intent, but intent? The raid was deliberate, the darkness was tactical, and the body count was acceptable. This is the foundation of Islamic warfare ethics—satanic indifference to innocence.
Even as standards evolved, with Abu Bakr later banning such killings, the precedent was set. Hanafi, Shafi’i, Hanbali schools all grappled with it, some permitting it in night raids. Why? Because the perfect prophet ordained it. Modern frauds like Yusuf al-Qaradawi call it exceptional, but ISIS and Hamas cite these exact hadiths for their rockets and beheadings. He orders the killing of women and children, and 1,400 years later, jihadis obey.
Sahih al-Bukhari Confirms the Carnage: Burning, Raiding, and Child-Slaughter
Sahih al-Bukhari, Islam’s gold standard, piles on in its chapter The People of a Dwelling Are Raided at Night and Children/Offspring Are Struck. Narrated Ibn Umar:
> “The Prophet (peace be upon him) burned the palm trees of Banu al-Nadir.”
Economic warfare leading to expulsion, sure—but linked explicitly to night raids killing offspring. Ibn Umar, eyewitness to multiple atrocities, authenticates it. This wasn’t defense; post-Constitution of Medina betrayal (another convenient accusation), Muhammad waged total war. The pagans at Bi’r Ma’una massacred Muslims? Retaliation justified baby-killing? No—revenge cycles are human, but sanctifying them as prophecy is satanic.
Contrast this with true prophets like Moses, who spared innocents in commandments, or Jesus, preaching love your enemies. Muhammad? A raider-chief draping murder in revelation. The hadiths don’t hide it; they boast of it.
Scholarly Contortions: Defending the Indefensible Killing of Women and Children
Islamic jurists have spent centuries tap-dancing around this monstrosity:
– Maliki School: Okay if women fight back—irrelevant in sleep raids.
– Hanbali School: Full permission in night attacks, per Muhammad’s fatwa.
– Shafi’i: Ambiguity for fog of war, but no outright ban.
Reformers like Rashid Rida plead for symbolism, as if words don’t inspire swords. Contemporary enablers downplay it for Geneva Conventions, but the texts endure, fueling fatwas from Taliban to Al-Qaeda. Muhammad forbade mutilation elsewhere (Sahih Muslim 1744)? Big deal—that’s minimal mercy amid systemic savagery.
Dig deeper: Banu Qurayza massacre (627 CE), where Muhammad approved beheading 600-900 Jewish men, enslaving women and children (Sunan Abi Dawud). Girls raped by victors, per Sahih Muslim 3432? That’s the pattern. He orders the killing of women and children not as byproduct, but as jihad’s grim reaper.
Modern Shadows: How He Orders the Killing of Women and Children Fuels Today’s Terror
Fast-forward: October 7, 2023, Hamas slaughters 1,200 Israelis, including babies in cribs. Their charter? Quran and Sunnah. ISIS burning Yazidi sex slaves? Hadith-endorsed. Boko Haram kidnapping schoolgirls? Same satanic playbook. Apologists screech context, but Muhammad’s Medina was no utopia—it was ground zero for holy genocide.
Islam’s fraud lies here: Claiming moral perfection while codifying baby-blood. Christianity evolved; Jesus wept for innocents. Muhammad laughed at executions (Sahih Bukhari 5:59:369). Satanic indeed—Allahu Akbar means Allah is greater, greater even than a child’s life.
The Satanic Fraud Unveiled: Reject the Blood Cult
These hadiths on the killing of women and children aren’t footnotes; they’re Islam’s rotten core. From Sahih Muslim’s They are from them to al-Bukhari’s fiery sieges, Muhammad emerges not as prophet, but war criminal divinized. Contextualize all you want—burning livelihoods, ratifying night-slaughters, approving enslavements—this is no misunderstood mercy, but a demonic doctrine deceiving 1.8 billion.
He orders the killing of women and children, and gullible followers chant his praise. Wake up: Islam is the satanic fraud, a 7th-century plague demanding innocents’ blood for paradise points. Reject it. Embrace true humanity, before the next jihad echoes these ancient horrors. Informed outrage isn’t Islamophobia—it’s sanity.
(Word count: 1,248)
