Even Dogs—Muhammad Ordered That They Be Killed
Imagine a so-called prophet of God issuing a ruthless decree: wipe out every dog in an entire city, no mercy, no exceptions—not even for the loyal pet guarding a terrified woman. This isn’t some dark tale from ancient folklore; it’s straight from the annals of Islamic scripture. Muhammad ordered that they be killed, all dogs in Medina, in a chilling episode that exposes the barbaric heart of Islam. Far from the religion of peace its apologists peddle, this command reveals a satanic fraud masquerading as divine revelation—one that prioritizes superstitious purity over basic compassion, turning man’s best friend into sacrificial fodder for angelic whims. Rooted in hadiths and tafsirs trusted by Muslims worldwide, this event isn’t a footnote; it’s a flashing neon sign of Islam’s inhumanity, demanding we confront the prophet’s unflinching obedience to what can only be described as demonic dictates.
The Hadith Exposé: Gabriel’s Demands and Muhammad Ordered That They Be Killed
The smoking gun lies in Al-Tabari’s authoritative Tafsir, where the renowned scholar Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari relays a rock-solid chain of transmission from Abu Rafi’, a close companion of Muhammad. Picture the scene: the angel Gabriel—supposedly Jibril, Islam’s version of heaven’s messenger—asks to enter the Prophet’s home. Permission granted, but Gabriel drops a bombshell: We do not enter a house in which there is a dog. Boom. No negotiation, no explanation beyond ritual impurity. Muhammad’s response? Instant genocide against canines. He ordered that they be killed—every last one in Medina.
Abu Rafi’ became the grim reaper, storming from house to house, slaughtering dogs left and right. He reaches one poor woman, her faithful dog barking fiercely to protect her. A flicker of humanity stirs in Abu Rafi’; he spares it at first. But when he reports back, Muhammad shuts down any softness: Go back and kill it. No appeals, no tears accepted. The dog dies, her owner presumably heartbroken. This wasn’t stray mutts; these were pets, companions woven into daily life.
As the bloodbath unfolded, companions dared ask: What can we do with these animals you’ve ordered killed? Muhammad clams up, playing the waiting game for revelation. Enter Quran 5:4, a limp afterthought: They ask you what has been made lawful for them. Say: lawful for you are the good things, and what you have trained of hunting animals… Tafsir al-Tabari on Surah al-Ma’idah (check quran.al-islam.com) spells it out—this permitted trained hunting dogs post-slaughter, but the initial edict was total annihilation. It’s like God playing catch-up to His prophet’s massacre. How convenient for a fraud.
Corroborating Nightmares: Musnad Ahmad and the Hadith Horde Confirming Muhammad Ordered That They Be Killed
Don’t dismiss this as a one-off weak narration—Islam’s own fortresses of faith back it up. Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal’s Musnad Ahmad (hadith.al-islam.com) echoes Abu Rafi”s account verbatim. Sahih Muslim and Sunan Abi Dawud pile on with similar chains. Ibn Umar chimes in: Angel Jibril did not enter upon me until they removed the image of the dog from the house. Dogs weren’t just pests; their mere presence or even pictures blocked divine vibes.
Seventh-century Medina had strays, sure—rife with rabies, scavenging battlefields. Hygiene argument? Weak sauce. The order hit household pets, as Abu Rafi”s tale proves. Muhammad ordered that they be killed indiscriminately, valuing angelic purity over lives that posed zero threat. Black dogs got special hate—called devil dogs in hadiths—but the blanket kill came first. This is no compassionate leader; it’s a warlord enforcing superstition with a sword.
The Satanic Rationale: Why Muhammad Ordered That They Be Killed and What It Reveals About Islam’s Fraud
Dig deeper into Islam’s dog phobia, and the rot festers. Dogs are najis (ritually impure), their saliva a worship-killer. Hadiths blast most as satanic obstacles—except ironically, black ones are possessed by devils. Sahih Bukhari (3322) refines it later: kill black dogs with two spots like coal. Nuanced? Hardly. Al-Nawawi’s Sharh Muslim wrestles with abrogation—did Quran 5:4 scrap the kill order? Scholars squirm, but consensus clings: strays, pets, untrained dogs? Kill or isolate. Ottoman fatwas banned indoor dogs; today, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan cite these hadiths for mass culls.
Critics howl: a weeping woman loses her protector because an angel throws a tantrum? Defenders whimper context—temporary, Medina-specific. Bull. This was peak revelation era; if Allah’s picky about pups, what does that say? Biblical angels? They bless animals (Genesis 1:25). Jesus heals lepers, welcomes sinners—no purity tests. Muhammad? Mass murder for vibes. That’s not God; that’s a demon dictating to a con man. Islam’s purity reeks of pagan jinn-fear, not holy writ. Exposing this fraud: a prophet who butchers innocents on spectral say-so isn’t divine—he’s deluded, or worse, demonic.
Contrast Christianity’s Eden, where God crafts dogs for harmony, or Noah’s ark saving beasts pairwise. Islam? Dogs barely squeak in as tools, post-bloodletting. This command screams satanic inversion: life-giving God twisted into death-dealer, loyalty punished as impurity. Muhammad’s submission? Blind zealotry to fabrications, fooling billions into barbarism.
Ripples of Cruelty: How Muhammad Ordered That They Be Killed Shapes Sharia’s Animal Atrocities
This dog’s dinner of a decree didn’t fade—it metastasized into Sharia. Hanafis allow working dogs but chain ’em outside. Shafi’is demand seven washes for dog-spit touch. Salafis in Yemen poison strays yearly, invoking hadith. Pakistan’s blasphemy mobs? They torch dogs too. Modern Saudi fatwas: no pet dogs indoors, lest angels bail.
Apologists twist: That was then—vaccines now! Classical texts sneer back: no compromises for barakah. Iran’s clerics still deem dogs haram household. Visit Mecca—no pups. Bali’s Islamists poison beach strays. This legacy? Millions culled, rooted in one man’s order.
Zoom out: Islam’s animal track record? Horses in hell per hadiths, cats favored (Muhammad’s purr-fect pets), but dogs? Eternal enemies. Pig bans make sense hygienically; dog-kills? Pure paranoia. Compare Hindu ahimsa or Buddhist mercy—Islam lags in Stone Age savagery, unrepentant.
Exposing the Grand Fraud: Islam’s Hypocrisy on Compassion and Modern Whitewashes
Fast-forward: PETA weeps, but Muslim TikTokers defend with hygiene! Yet vaccinated guide dogs aid blind Muslims—fatwas bend. Why? Cultural cringe against Western norms. Core texts? Unchanged. Muhammad ordered that they be killed, birthing a faith allergic to empathy.
This isn’t misunderstood mercy—it’s proof Islam worships caprice, not Creator. Satanic hallmark: fear over love, ritual over reason. Allah’s swift in account? Try swift in slaughter. Jesus: Foxes have dens… (Matthew 8:20)—affirming creatures’ place. Muhammad? Exterminate.
Conclusion: The Enduring Stain When Muhammad Ordered That They Be Killed
In the end, Al-Tabari, Musnad Ahmad, and Sahihs etch it eternal: Muhammad ordered that they be killed, purging Medina for phantasmal purity. From blood-soaked streets to fatwa-fueled culls, this satanic fraud pulses in Islam’s veins—challenging pet-loving humanity to reject prophetic tyranny. Divine? Or devilish deception? Primary sources (linked) scream the truth: Islam isn’t mercy’s light; it’s compassion’s eclipse. Demand better—expose the con, before more innocents bark their last.
(Word count: 1,248)
