Because It Is from Other Than Allah, They Found Differences – Is the Verse ‘And the Male and Female’?
In the so-called rich tapestry of Quranic preservation, variant readings have ignited endless confusion, division, and damning evidence that exposes Islam as a colossal fraud concocted by Muhammad and his tribal cronies. Critics rightly hammer this point home: Because it is from other than Allah, they found differences. Nowhere is this more glaring than in the verse And the male and female from Surah Al-Layl (The Night). Far from some miraculous flexibility, these variant readings scream human fabrication—a patchwork of tribal dialects stitched together by illiterates, riddled with inconsistencies that no divine text could tolerate. What Muslims peddle as perfection is nothing but a satanic deception, a man-made mess masquerading as God’s word. Let’s rip the veil off this sham, dissecting the facts, history, and the laughable scholarly consensus that props up this hoax.
Understanding Variant Readings in the Quran: A Recipe for Chaos
Variant readings, or qira’at in Arabic, aren’t the noble divine variations apologists claim. They’re blatant discrepancies in wording, grammar, and even meaning, born from Muhammad’s alleged revelation in seven ahruf (modes)—a vague excuse for why his illiterate followers couldn’t keep their stories straight. The Quran itself admits to piecemeal delivery: We have sent it down gradually in Arabic and have diversified it therein (17:106 paraphrase). This wasn’t mercy; it was a license for error, letting Arabia’s dialect-divided bedouins mangle the text to suit their tongues.
Over 23 years, Muhammad’s companions memorized these variant readings orally— a recipe for disaster in a pre-literate society rife with feuds and forgetfulness. After his death in 632 CE, Caliph Abu Bakr scrambled to compile scraps amid wars that saw huffaz (memorizers) slaughtered by the thousands (a chaotic process where verses were famously lost to a hungry goat). Uthman then standardized it in the Quraishi dialect around 650 CE, burning rival versions to hide the mess (a chaotic process detailed in the story of the Quran’s compilation). But the oral variants lingered like ghosts, with big shots like Ibn Mas’ud, Ubayy ibn Ka’b, and Ali ibn Abi Talib peddling their own private Qurans—none matching Uthman’s exactly (another stark example involves a variant on the Prophet’s relationship to believers).
Why do variant readings demolish Islam’s claims? (and by extension, the core doctrine that the Quran is infallible) Human texts evolve into chaos over time; divine ones don’t tolerate a single comma-shift. Yet here we have cataloged thousands of variants in tomes like Ibn Al-Jazari’s Al-Nashr fi al-Qira’at al-Ashr and Abd al-Latif al-Kitab’s Mu’jam al-Qira’at. These aren’t mutually protecting—they’re a satanic smokescreen, where core meanings twist just enough to fuel sectarian strife, from Sunni-Shia splits to modern Salafi-Wahhabi clashes. Islam’s oral primacy is a myth; it’s why Muslims today recite over 10 authentic versions, each claiming prophetic purity while contradicting the rest.
Variant Readings and Surah Al-Layl: The Smoking Gun of Fraud
Surah Al-Layl (92:1-3) starts with oaths: By the night when it covers, and [by] the day when it appears, and [by] Him who created the male and female. The phrase wa mā khalaqa l-dhakara wa l-unthā (and [by] Him who created the male and female) is ground zero for exposure. Skeptics don’t claim—they prove—this reeks of human meddling.
Historical records burst with variant readings from Muhammad’s own pals, proving no divine dictation occurred. Examples:
– Hafs recitation (standard today, via Asim through Kisa’i): Wa mā khalaqa l-dhakara wa l-unthā—Allah as creator.
– Ibn Kathir: Vowel tweaks like tanween on dhakara, fiddling with grammar.
– Ibn Mas’ud: Boldly dropped mā khalaqa, reciting Wa l-dhakari wa l-unthā—swearing by male and female directly, sans creator mention. In some reports, he outright rejected Uthman’s mushaf!
– Ubayy ibn Ka’b: Stuffed extra words in other surahs; for Al-Layl, elongated khalaqa for dramatic flair.
These weren’t celebrated; they sparked fury. Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal buried them in his Musnad, Al-Tabari awkwardly cross-referenced in Tafsir, but companions like Ibn Mas’ud called Uthman’s version deficient. No prophetic mercy—just power plays. Ubayy even had two extra surahs (Al-Hafd and Al-Khal’), axed by Uthman. If divine, why the burnings? Why the fights? This is satanic division, pitting Muslims against each other from day one.
Specific Examples of Variant Readings in Surah Al-Layl: Proof of Fabrication
Dig into the dirt:
| Reader/Companion | Variant Form | Explanation: Why It Exposes the Fraud |
|——————|——————————-|—————————————|
| Hafs (standard) | Wa mā khalaqa l-dhakara wa l-unthā | Baseline, but dominates only post-Uthman bullying. |
| Ibn Amir | Wa mā khalaqa l-dhakari wal unthā | Grammatical hacks (i’rab) for dialect whims—divine word bending to Arabs? Laughable. |
| Ibn Mas’ud | Wa l-dhakari wa l-unthā | Omits creator attribution—tawhid (God’s oneness) gutted? Ibn Mas’ud called mushaf incomplete! |
| Hamzah | Idgham or madd tweaks | Rhythm games turning poetry into plaything—no fixed divine text here. |
These aren’t enrichments; they’re contradictions eroding tawhid. One version swears by Allah’s creation; another just by sexes. Divine harmony? It’s a cacophony proving Muhammad’s revelations were his fevered inventions, tweaked by followers.
Why Variant Readings Prove Satanic Human Origin, Not Divinity
Apologists’ house of cards collapses: If Quranic, why variant readings at all? Man-made books like the Bible have thousands of variants—but at least they’re honest about evolution. The Quran? Uthman torched evidence to forge unity, yet variants persist, fewer than claimed but damningly diverse. Not mutawatir (mass-transmitted) miracles, but shadh rarities exposing forgery.
Contrast Christianity’s open textual criticism with Islam’s censorship—King Fahd Complex prints variants today, but only after centuries of suppression. The Prophet’s seven ahruf hadith (Bukhari) is a retrofit excuse, as post-Muhammad disputes raged. Human fraud fractures; Allah’s word wouldn’t need 10-14 qari chains or ijazas from Al-Azhar to prop it up.
This system’s a farce: Early Muslims recited differently because there was no single Quran—just oral bazaar haggling. Al-Layl’s binaries (night/day, male/female) mock the imbalance: hidden lies vs. exposed truths.
The Scholarly Legacy of Variant Readings: A Chain of Deception
From Al-Shatibi’s Hirz al-Amani to today’s ijaza-floggers, scholars perpetuate the con. Al-Azhar certifies variants like rubber stamps on snake oil. In Al-Layl, they poetically mirror themes? Nonsense—these twists fuel doubt, mirroring Islam’s core: duality of truth (what’s recited) vs. lie (what’s claimed).
Variant Readings Seal Islam’s Fate as Satanic Fraud
Variant readings aren’t Quranic miracles—they’re the nails in Islam’s coffin. For And the male and female, companions’ squabbles shout human origin: no unity, no preservation, just tribal tinkering. Skeptics nail it: differences prove other than Allah. Unlike the Bible’s honest variants, Islam hides behind authenticity while burning rivals.
Allah’s promise (15:9): We will be its guardian? A lie—1400 years of variants, lost codices (like Aisha’s goat-chewed surahs), and 30+ mushafs pre-Uthman. Dive into real scholarship: Ibn Abi Dawud’s Kitab al-Masahif lists mutilations; even Muslim sources admit naskh (abrogations) as damage control.
Islam’s a satanic fraud: Muhammad’s power grab, dressed in revelation, crumbling under variant readings. Wake up—it’s not faith; it’s the ultimate deception. Reject the darkness; embrace verifiable truth.
(Word count: 1,248)
