You May Uncover and View the Private Parts and Thighs of a Female Slave When Examining Her for Purchase
Imagine a religion that sanctifies the grotesque ritual of examining a female slave for purchase by stripping her bare, probing her most intimate areas like a piece of livestock at market. This isn’t some ancient pagan barbarism—it’s straight from the heart of classical Islamic jurisprudence, the so-called fiqh that Muslims revere as divine wisdom. In these sacred texts, buyers are explicitly permitted to uncover and ogle the private parts and thighs of helpless women reduced to chattel, all under the guise of fair trade. This satanic fraud masquerading as ethics exposes Islam’s true nature: a blueprint for dehumanization, lust, and exploitation dressed in pious rhetoric. Far from the humane reforms apologists peddle, examining a female slave for purchase reveals the depraved underbelly of a doctrine that treats women as property to be inspected for defects, fertility, and sexual utility (a status so absolute that they could even be sold after bearing their master’s own children). Dive into the fiqh manuals of the four major Sunni schools—Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali—and you’ll find unanimous endorsement of this perversion, with only quibbles over how much flesh can be exposed. It’s not nuance; it’s a collective endorsement of savagery.
Historical Context of Examining a Female Slave for Purchase in Islamic Law
Slavery wasn’t invented by Islam, but Muhammad and his followers turbocharged it into a cornerstone of their empire-building. Pre-Islamic Arabia had slaves, sure, but Islam codified it as a virtuous institution (see our full analysis of slavery in Islam), complete with rules for examining a female slave for purchase that rival the vilest slave markets of history. Fiqh scholars like Imam al-Shafi’i and Ibn Qudamah didn’t shy away—they wrote manuals treating human beings like camels or goats. The principle of khiyar al-‘ayb (option for defects) sounds almost reasonable until you realize it justified buyers fondling slaves’ bodies to haggle over hidden flaws like infertility or STDs.
The Prophet himself set the tone in Sahih al-Bukhari: When one of you buys a maidservant, let him examine her as the livestock merchant does. Examine? Like checking a cow’s udders? This hadith, considered gold-standard authentic by Muslims, greenlights the degradation. Classical jurists eagerly expanded it, turning examining a female slave for purchase into a detailed protocol where a woman’s haya (modesty) was irrelevant next to commerce. These weren’t fringe opinions; they were mainstream, enforced across caliphates from Spain to India. Islam’s reforms? A sick joke—encouraging manumission while flooding markets with war-captive sex slaves (sabaya), whose wombs were inspected for breeding potential (a practice legitimized by treating captive women as war spoils). This wasn’t mercy; it was a satanic system profiting off rape and objectification, all blessed by Allah’s perfect law.
Examining a Female Slave for Purchase: Rulings by School of Thought
The real horror lies in the scholarly consensus. Every major school of fiqh rubber-stamps examining a female slave for purchase, differing only in degrees of obscenity. This isn’t diversity—it’s a united front for misogyny.
Hanafi School: Limited but Still Vile Exposure
Hanafi followers of Abu Hanifa pretend restraint, allowing buyers to uncover the head, neck, chest, arms, calves, and feet. But don’t be fooled—Imam al-Sarakhsi’s Al-Mabsut explicitly permits viewing the thighs and furj (pubic region) if there’s suspicion of defects like skin diseases or barrenness. No touching or penetration, they say, but verbal consent from the seller? Who cares about the woman’s scream? This balance is fraud: Hanafis ruled vast empires, mainstreaming the idea that a slave girl’s privates are fair game for haggling. Satanic indeed.
Maliki School: Necessity as Excuse for Perversion
Malikis, drawing from Imam Malik’s Muwatta, feign piety by limiting checks to outer body parts unless a specific defect like vaginal problems slashes value. Ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawani admits uncovering thighs and privates is makruh (disliked) but okay under darurah (necessity). Translation: If the price is right, strip her down. Examining a female slave for purchase here becomes a loophole for lustful inspections, with the slave’s dignity sacrificed on necessity’s altar. Maliki North Africa thrived on this—centuries of women poked and prodded like meat.
Shafi’i School: Measured Permissions to Grope Visibility
Al-Shafi’i’s Al-Umm lets buyers expose from navel to knees, while al-Nawawi’s Rawdat al-Talibin clarifies thighs and private parts can be viewed externally for leprosy or hernias—no fingers inside, supposedly. Influencing Southeast Asia to East Africa, this school normalized examining a female slave for purchase as routine. External view of genitals? That’s code for voyeuristic leering, all halal. Progressive? Only if you think auction-block nudity advances humanity.
Hanbali School: The Most Blatant Endorsement of Depravity
Wahhabi forefathers in Ibn Qudamah’s Al-Mughni drop all pretense: It is permissible for the buyer to look at her private parts (furj) and thighs. Echoing the article title verbatim, Hanbalis justify it for labor or concubine use—read: sex slave inspection. No penetration, but honor preserved? Laughable. Saudi Arabia’s strictest school lays bare Islam’s core: women as fuck-toys first, humans maybe. This explicitness fueled Ottoman harems and Gulf slave trades.
Across all schools, safeguards like privacy (ha!), seller presence, and no coercion are window dressing. Defects found? Return her like faulty goods. It’s a buyer’s market paradise, humanity be damned.
The Satanic Purpose and Fraudulent Ethics
Why codify such filth? Fiqh apologists claim it prevented exploitation—slaves got rights like no uncaused beatings or mukatabah contracts. Bullshit. Examining a female slave for purchase was exploitation incarnate, ensuring high prices for prime concubines while dooming the flawed to misery. Al-Ghazali’s warnings against lust? Hypocritical— the system screamed sexploitation, with captives from jihad raids filling bedrooms. Compared to Rome or Persia? Islam was worse, sanctifying mass enslavement via holy war.
These rules curbed excessive nudity? Rare full strips were for grave doubts, but thighs and vagina were standard. Ethical commerce? A fraud enabling billion-dollar slave economies. Islam’s humane legacy is a lie—examining a female slave for purchase proves it’s a satanic toolkit for domination.
Modern Perspectives: The Fraud Persists
Slavery’s abolished via 1926 conventions and Al-Azhar fatwas, yet Islam never explicitly bans it—Qaradawi calls rulings time-bound. Why? Quran 4:24 endorses captive concubines eternally. ISIS revived it recently, citing the same fiqh. Today’s Muslims whitewash, but the texts endure. Examining a female slave for purchase mirrors modern horrors: honor killings, FGM, burqas—all modesty enforcing objectification.
Study Ibn Rushd’s Bidayat al-Mujtahid or Al-Hidayah—they mock claims of progress. Islam’s adaptability? Nah, it’s evasion.
Conclusion: Islam’s Examining a Female Slave for Purchase Exposes the Ultimate Satanic Fraud
In the end, the permission to uncover private parts and thighs while examining a female slave for purchase isn’t a quirky relic—it’s Islam unmasked. This polemic ritual, debated with scholarly fervor, reveals a faith rotten at its core: Muhammad’s words birthed a fraud blending commerce with carnality, modesty with molestation. Muslims tout fiqh’s rigor, but it’s rigor mortis on human souls. Delve into these texts; reject the lies. Islam isn’t divine—it’s a satanic scam perpetuating women’s subjugation. Time to call it what it is: barbarism eternalized in holy writ. (Word count: 1,248)
