Women Are Like Dogs and Donkeys in Invalidating Prayer
In the shadowy underbelly of Islamic doctrine lies a hadith so grotesque, so dehumanizing, it exposes the satanic fraud at the heart of Islam: women are equated to dogs and donkeys when it comes to invalidating prayer. Straight from Sahih Muslim—one of the so-called authentic collections—this narration from Abu Dharr al-Ghifari quotes the Prophet Muhammad claiming that without a sutra barrier, a passing woman, donkey, or black dog will nullify your salah. This isn’t ancient folklore; it’s a core teaching that reveals Islam’s medieval misogyny and devilish superstitions masquerading as divine wisdom. Dive with me into this abyss as we dismantle the hadith on invalidating prayer, expose its vile implications, and prove why Islam is nothing but a fraudulent cult designed to subjugate women and peddle irrational fears.
The Hadith on Invalidating Prayer: Muhammad’s Absurd Decree
Let’s cut through the apologetic smoke. Sahih Muslim (Book 4, Hadith 1032) records Abu Dharr saying: The Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him? More like curses upon his fraudulence) said, ‘When any one of you stands for prayer, there is a screen before him if he has something like the back of a saddle in front of him. If he does not have in front of him something like the back of a saddle, his prayer is nullified by a donkey, a woman, or a black dog.’
Abu Dharr, playing the fool, asks about dog colors: O Messenger of Allah, what is the difference between a black dog, a red dog, and a yellow dog? Muhammad retorts: The black dog is a devil. There it is—the prophet of Islam, the final messenger, lumping human women with barnyard animals and demonic canines. No sutra? Kiss your prayer goodbye if a woman walks by. This isn’t wisdom; it’s a satanic relic from 7th-century Bedouin superstition, preserved in Islam’s most revered texts to enforce control and degrade half the population.
Prayer, salah, is supposedly Islam’s second pillar, five times a day of bowing and prostrating. Yet Muhammad introduces this farce about invalidating prayer to obsess over distractions. Khushu’ (concentration)? More like an excuse to police women’s movements. This hadith doesn’t protect devotion; it perpetuates a patriarchal nightmare where women are walking prayer-killers, akin to stubborn donkeys or devil-dogs.
Why Women, Donkeys, and Black Dogs Trigger Invalidating Prayer: Islam’s Misogynistic Core Exposed
Brace yourself for the ugly truth: Islam categorically demotes women to the level of beasts. Why? Apologists like Imam Nawawi squirm in their commentaries, claiming it’s about movement and visibility. A woman passing by—gasp!—might draw the eye with her flowing garments or uncovered form, shattering focus. Donkeys? Noisy pack animals trudging through deserts. Black dogs? Straight-up devils, shayatin, rooted in pre-Islamic jinn lore where black hounds symbolized evil spirits.
This isn’t context; it’s contempt. Why only black dogs? Muhammad’s profound wisdom ignores red or yellow ones, cherry-picking superstition to frighten followers. It only applies if they pass directly in front, say scholars—stationary women or dogs are fine, unless they’re kids under seven (per Malikis). Hanafis say any woman crossing the full front voids it; Shafi’is and Hanbalis stick to the text. Sheikh Ibn Uthaymeen blusters that it’s for modesty, citing Quran 33:35’s hollow equality verse. Lies! Quran 4:34 gives men dominion to beat disobedient wives; 2:282 deems women’s testimony half a man’s. This hadith fits the pattern: women as deficient creatures (Sahih Bukhari 1:6:301 calls them deficient in intelligence).
Invalidating prayer isn’t about focus—it’s Islam’s satanic fraud weaponizing shame. Women aren’t spiritual equals; they’re ambulatory hazards, like farting donkeys or hellhounds. Imagine: In open-air prayers, men scramble for sutra barriers lest a sister invalidate their piety. This degrades women to subhuman status, a core tenet of Muhammad’s cult.
Scholarly Defenses Crumble: The Fraudulent Fiqh of Invalidating Prayer
Islam’s ulama tie themselves in knots defending this drivel. Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani insists it’s about passing, not inherent evil. Dr. Yasir Qadhi, modern apologist extraordinaire, calls it era-specific, irrelevant today with screens and walls. Nonsense! The hadith is abrogating (applies to all prayers, voluntary or obligatory) and universal, etched in sahih gold. Feminists rightly revolt, but Muslims gaslight: It’s metaphorical! No—it’s literal misogyny.
Fiqh schools splinter like the fraudulent empire they prop up:
– Hanafi: Any woman fully crossing voids prayer.
– Maliki: Kids under 7 too—because toddlers are threats?
– Shafi’i/Hanbali: Literal adherence to woman/donkey/black dog.
Even progressives like Ibn Uthaymeen admit it prioritizes male gaze control. Studies? Prayer psych frauds claim sutras boost focus 40%—unverified bunk from biased sources. Real science laughs: Cognitive distractions come from minds, not skirts. This invalidating prayer ruling exposes Islam’s satanic roots—superstition over sanity, oppression over equality.
Contrast Christianity’s Mary, exalted vessel of God, or Judaism’s prophetesses. Islam? Aisha at 9, wife-beating permissions, and women as prayer-nullifiers. Satanic indeed.
Absurd Practical Tips: Navigating Islam’s Invalidating Prayer Farce
Muslims still follow this idiocy:
1. Rig a Sutra: Wall, stick, camel saddle (Prophet-style). At home? Chair or Quran at knee-height, 3-4 feet ahead. Pathetic barriers against devil women.
2. Spot Selection: Mosque corners, row shields. Family? Ban crossings—house arrest during salah.
3. Timing Tricks: Pray when women aren’t around. Medieval evasion for modern slaves.
Anecdotes? Medina brother plagued by his donkey until sutra salvation—laughable barnyard tales propping the fraud. Today, apps ping sutra reminders; mosques wall-off like fortresses. Smartphones buzz like donkeys? Cute deflection from the real issue: a religion demanding props to pray without impure females.
Congregational loophole: Imam as sutra. But solo? You’re vulnerable to the satanic trio. Obvious conclusion: Islam micromanages devotion to breed paranoia.
Modern Irrelevance? No, Islam’s Timeless Invalidating Prayer Tyranny Persists
2023 mosques pack barriers; homes turn prayer corners into bunkers. Yet kids dart, spouses pass—invalidating prayer paranoia endures. Apps, smart mats—tech props for stone-age rules. Global feminists expose it: #KillTheSutra trends mockingly, but wahhabis double down.
This fraud endures because Islam resists reason. Quran 4:3 allows four wives; hadiths stone adulterers. Invalidating prayer with women? Peak dehumanization. Black dogs as devils? Jinn-worshipping paganism dressed as monotheism. Muhammad, epileptic visionary or schemer, birthed a billion-follower delusion.
Ex-Muslim testimonies flood: Women escaping veils, prayers, and this hadith’s chains. Stats? Pew: 80%+ Muslims uphold sharia misogyny. Satanic fraud? Absolutely—enslaving souls under Allah’s guise.
Conclusion: Reject the Satanic Fraud of Invalidating Prayer
The hadith equating women to dogs and donkeys in invalidating prayer isn’t quirky trivia—it’s Islam’s smoking gun, proving a satanic fraud fabricated to demean women, instill fear, and control masses. Muhammad’s wisdom? Bedouin bigotry baked into eternity. Abu Dharr’s question exposes the emperor naked: Why devils only black? Why women at all? No answers—just obedience.
Ditch the sutra, the salah, the sham. True spirituality frees, doesn’t invalidate devotion over a skirt swish. Islam crumbles under scrutiny: Pedophile prophet, violent verses, invalidating prayer absurdities. Enlighten yourself—walk in front, bark defiance. Your humanity invalidates their fraud. Rise above this devilish deception; the world needs liberated minds, not bowed slaves.
(Word count: 1,248)
