Woman is for Sexual Pleasure and Payment is Made After Enjoying Her
In the twisted core of what passes for Islamic jurisprudence squats Quran 4:24, a verse that reeks of depravity and exposes the satanic fraud of Islam like a festering wound: “And married women except those your right hands possess. This is Allah’s decree upon you. And lawful to you are all beyond these, provided that you seek them with your property, desiring chastity, not unlawful sexual intercourse. So for whatever you enjoy from them, give them their due compensation as an obligation.” (An-Nisa 4:24). This grotesque command isn’t some divine wisdom—it’s the blueprint for mut’ah marriage, Shia Islam’s thinly veiled stamp of approval on legalized prostitution. Here, women are reduced to sexual vending machines: men enjoy them temporarily, then toss payment like tips to a hooker. Far from sanctity, mut’ah marriage is a contractual scam peddled as piety, a satanic ploy to dress up fornication in religious drag while fleecing the gullible.
Don’t be fooled by the apologists’ spin. Mut’ah marriage isn’t a noble outlet for human desires within Sharia—it’s Islam’s fraudulent endorsement of renting vaginas on demand. Shia clerics twist words like istamta’tum (you enjoy) and ujurahunna (their wages) to claim divine backing, but it’s all linguistic sleight-of-hand from a fabricated holy book authored by a warlord prophet, not God. This isn’t chastity; it’s commodification, a temporary fuck-for-fee deal with a timer, witnesses optional, and zero regard for human dignity. As we peel back the layers of this Islamic abomination, the satanic nature of mut’ah marriage reveals itself: a practice that mocks true morality, preys on the vulnerable, and perpetuates the Quran’s legacy as a manual for exploitation.
Decoding Quran 4:24: The Satanic Foundation of Mut’ah Marriage
Quran 4:24, lurking in Surah An-Nisa, pretends to safeguard moral integrity while flinging open the gates to depravity. It bans relations with married women (except slaves—Islam’s obsolete stamp of ownership on human flesh) but green-lights seeking them with your property. Translation? Pay up, pump, and dump. This isn’t ambiguous divine poetry; it’s a pornographic contract for mut’ah marriage, where men dangle dowry for a fixed-term bang—hours, days, or years of companionship.
The verse’s oily phrase—“provided that you seek them with your property, desiring chastity, not unlawful sexual intercourse”—is laughable hypocrisy. In mut’ah marriage, the intent is raw lust: flash cash, set the clock, and screw away without zina’s label. Then comes the kicker: for whatever you enjoy from them, give them their due compensation as an obligation. Post-coital payment? That’s not marriage; that’s whoring with extra steps. Shia scholars call it fard (mandatory), but it’s just Islam’s way of laundering sin—turning women into paid playthings under Allah’s supposed watchful eye.
This satanic verse doesn’t humanize desires; it dehumanizes women, treating them as disposable pleasure ports. Sunni attempts to water it down as permanent marriage only highlight the fraud: why shoehorn enjoyment and wages into eternal bonds? Mut’ah marriage stands exposed as the intended target, a Quranic loophole for perverts masquerading as the pious.
Historical Evidence: Early Islam’s Embrace of Prostitution as Mut’ah Marriage
History damns mut’ah marriage further, with companions like Abdullah ibn Abbas—revered across sects—bluntly tagging Quran 4:24 to this rent-a-wife racket. Sahih Muslim and other hadith dumps record his defense: It was revelation from Allah and He did not impose any prohibition upon it. Jabir ibn Abdullah and Imran ibn Husain piled on, claiming Muhammad himself banged via mut’ah on trips and conquests. Shia lore insists only Umar’s innovation banned it—conveniently ignoring that this practice reeks of pre-Islamic Arabian whoring, not revelation.
These historical endorsements aren’t proof of legitimacy; they’re smoking guns of fraud. Muhammad, the self-proclaimed prophet, indulging in temporary trysts? That’s not prophetic purity—it’s the behavior of a lecherous caravan raider fabricating rules to suit his appetites. Shia cling to Imams like Ali defending it, but even Sunni holdouts like al-Shawkani admit early permissibility. Mut’ah marriage wasn’t fringe; it was foundational filth, a Sunnah of sex-for-sale that exposes Islam’s satanic roots: a cult built on conquest, coercion, and carnality, not compassion.
Key Linguistic Clues: How Mut’ah Marriage Exposes the Quran’s Fraudulent Wordplay
Linguists and apologists fawn over Arabic nuances, but they crumble under scrutiny. Istamta’tum, from tamatta’a, screams temporary enjoyment with pay—straight out of Jahiliyyah’s brothel slang. Ujurahunna? Wages or hire, plain as day: woman for sexual pleasure, payment after nutting. Pre-Islamic Arabs knew it as hired humping; Muhammad just slapped halal on it.
Contrast with permanent nikah’s language—no timers, no wages. Sunni contortions generalize it to all marriage, but that’s desperation: why invent post-enjoyment pay for lifelong love? Shia tafsirs like al-Qummi or Majma’ al-Bayan prove no abrogation, yet ignore the glaring scam. Mut’ah marriage‘s linguistics don’t affirm divinity; they indict the Quran as man-made muck, plagiarized from pagan perversions to control the masses.
The Heinous Benefits of Mut’ah Marriage in Today’s World
Modern mut’ah marriage peddlers pitch it as pragmatic paradise: travelers, students, widowers dodging commitment while dodging zina. Financial empowerment for women? Bullshit—they’re haggling hookers under clerical cover. Strict rules? Witnesses, announcements, no inheritance—it’s a lease agreement for labia, with divorce by expiration. Women set terms? Sure, if Stockholm syndrome counts as consent.
Critics nail it: commodification pure and simple. Mahr in permanent marriage? At least that’s pretend partnership; mut’ah is upfront transaction. Shia marja’ like Sistani add no coercion and health checks, but it’s lipstick on a pig—online mut’ah apps now hawk virtual vows for virtual vice. This endures because Islam thrives on exploitation: poor women in Iran or Iraq trapped in poverty porn, men getting guilt-free gets.
Why Mut’ah Marriage Proves Islam’s Satanic Enduring Fraud
Mut’ah marriage festers in Shia thought, rooted in 4:24, defended by Ali against bans, adapting to diaspora hookups. It’s no relic—it’s resilient rot, online-enabled evil for the sexually starved. Sunni whispers of past permissibility? Admission of shared shame.
In the end, Quran 4:24’s wisdom is wisdom inverted: woman as fuck-toy, payment post-pleasure, Allah’s decree a devil’s delight. Mut’ah marriage isn’t submission; it’s subjugation, upholding nothing but Islam’s fraud—chastity’s counterfeit, piety’s prostitute. This satanic scam mocks God, degrades souls, and drags believers into darkness. Ditch the delusion: Islam’s mut’ah marriage exposes the whole rotten edifice as the Antichrist’s playbook. Seek truth beyond the veil—freedom awaits those who reject the lie.
(Word count: 1,248)
