When Aisha Was Pleased She Would Swear ‘By the Lord of Muhammad’; When Angry, ‘By the Lord of Ibrahim’
Imagine a religion so riddled with contradictions and idolatrous whispers that even its most revered prophet’s wife couldn’t hide the farce. Welcome to the dark underbelly of Islam, where When Aisha Was Pleased She Would Swear ‘By the Lord of Muhammad’; When Angry, ‘By the Lord of Ibrahim’ isn’t a heartwarming tale of marital bliss—it’s a damning expose of shirk, blasphemy, and a satanic deception masquerading as divine truth. This hadith, peddled as authentic in Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim, reveals the cult-like worship of Muhammad at Islam’s core, a fraud so blatant it should shatter any illusion of monotheism. Far from timeless lessons, it’s a glaring red flag proving Islam elevates a mere man to near-godhood, mocking the God of Abraham while dragging billions into spiritual delusion.
This isn’t some obscure footnote—it’s frontline evidence of Islam’s rot (another hadith reveals how Aisha’s words could turn the sea bitter). Aisha, Muhammad’s child bride, reportedly swore oaths tying Allah’s lordship directly to her husband when pleased, only ditching his name in anger for the safer Abraham. Sound pious? Think again. In true biblical monotheism, you’d never utter such nonsense; it’s idolatry screaming from the pages of Islam’s own scriptures. Let’s dismantle this satanic fraud piece by piece, exposing how When Aisha Was Pleased She Would Swear ‘By the Lord of Muhammad’; When Angry, ‘By the Lord of Ibrahim’ unmasks the Quran’s counterfeit prophet and his blasphemous legacy.
The Blasphemous Oaths: Shirk Disguised as Affection
At the heart of this farce lies a hadith narrated through Abu Hurairah in Sahih Bukhari (Book 57, Hadith 50) and Sahih Muslim (Book 8, Hadith 3503). Muhammad smugly tells Aisha: I know when you are pleased with me and when you are angry (an emotion she was known to display quite openly). She bites: How? He boasts: When pleased, you say, ‘No, by the Lord of Muhammad.’ When angry, ‘No, by the Lord of Ibrahim.’ Aisha retorts, By Allah, I only abandon your name (not you) (a dynamic further highlighted by reports that divine revelation only came to him while in her garment).
Stop right there. Swearing by the Lord of Muhammad? That’s not devotion; that’s shirk—the unforgivable sin Islam itself claims to abhor (Quran 4:48). You’re invoking Allah as Muhammad’s personal deity, implying a special lord-servant bond that borders on divinity for the prophet. It’s the same satanic sleight-of-hand that has Muslims chanting Muhammad is the best of creation or prostrating toward his birthplace in Mecca. When angry, she pivots to Lord of Ibrahim, the patriarch whose pure monotheism (Quran 3:67) Muhammad butchered into a tribal warlord’s fantasy.
This isn’t human tenderness—it’s a cult ritual. Aisha, married to Muhammad at age 6 or 9 (Bukhari 5:58:234), equates her pedophile husband’s name with God’s lordship in moments of pleasure (a dynamic made even more disturbing by the historical evidence for Aisha’s young age). Polemic? No, factual. Islam’s apologists spin it as reverence, but it’s the Emperor’s New Clothes of theology: naked idolatry. The God of the Bible thunders, You shall have no other gods before Me (Exodus 20:3). Yet here, Muhammad revels in being semi-deified by his own wife. Satanic fraud, exposed.
Aisha’s Piety: Child Bride in a Prophet’s Delusion
Understanding the Fraudulent Context of When Aisha Was Pleased She Would Swear ‘By the Lord of Muhammad’
To grasp the depravity, meet Aisha bint Abi Bakr: Mother of the Believers, narrator of over 2,000 hadiths, and Muhammad’s favorite sex toy. Married pre-puberty, she played with dolls in his bed (Bukhari 8:73:151)—a detail Islam’s defenders dodge like plague. Their union? Playful races, jealousy-fueled quarrels, and oaths that reek of paganism.
Scholars like Imam Nawawi gush over Muhammad’s firasa (insight), but it’s manipulative gaslighting. He weaponizes her words to flaunt omniscience, turning marital spats into hagiography. When Aisha Was Pleased She Would Swear ‘By the Lord of Muhammad’, it wasn’t alignment with a messenger—it was subconscious worship of the man. Lord of Muhammad fuses God with prophet, echoing pre-Islamic jahiliyyah Arabia’s tribal deities. Contrast with Abraham: his God demanded total separation (Genesis 18:25 forbids equating judges with the Judge).
Aisha’s By Allah, I abandon your name, not you is no piety—it’s codependent cult-speak. She admits ditching his name in anger but clings to the man. This bond fueled Islam’s spread: Aisha led the Battle of the Camel (656 CE), spilling Muslim blood over succession squabbles. Pious? She’s Jezebel in hijab, propping up a fraud.
Satanic Lessons from When Aisha Was Pleased She Would Swear ‘By the Lord of Muhammad’
Islam boasts lessons here: emotional intelligence, oath sanctity, marital harmony. Rubbish. Let’s invert the fraud:
1. Emotional Manipulation as Prophecy: Muhammad’s attentiveness is stalking disguised as sunnah. Spouses reading cues? Healthy. A prophet claiming supernatural perception? Delusion. He never hit women (they say), yet enabled wife-beating (Quran 4:34). This hadith whitewashes his control freakery.
2. Oaths as Blasphemy Blueprints: Quran 5:89 warns against false oaths, but Aisha’s are shirk-laden. Permissible to swear Lord of so-and-so? Ibn Hajar approves, but it’s satanic license to associate partners with God. True monotheism rejects this; Judaism and Christianity swear by God alone.
3. Toxic Harmony: Disagreements natural, but resolution demands deifying the husband. Aisha’s temper tantrums model nothing—except excusing Muhammad’s 11 wives, slave girls, and child fixation. Modern Muslims ape this: honor killings, polygamy, all rooted in prophetic toxicity.
Broader? Muhammad’s gentleness is myth. He ordered assassinations (Ibn Ishaq), massacred Banu Qurayza. When Aisha Was Pleased She Would Swear ‘By the Lord of Muhammad’, it glorified a warlord, not a saint.
Questioning the Authentic Chains: Cracks in the Satanic Facade
Hadith science? A joke. Chains through Abu Hurairah (convert with 5,000+ narrations—convenient) and Aisha herself. Ibn Hajar praises isnad, but forgeries abound; even Bukhari rejected 99% of submitted hadiths. Modern critics like Ignaz Goldziher expose fabrication mills.
Fiqh rulings? They permit this shirk! Al-Qaradawi counsels anger management via prophetic oaths—channel rage to Allah? No, to Muhammad’s ego. Interfaith? This hadith repels: Christianity’s Jesus never needed wife-sworn lordship; He was God incarnate (John 1:1).
Why When Aisha Was Pleased She Would Swear ‘By the Lord of Muhammad’ Dooms Modern Islam
Today’s Muslims: divorce rates soaring, domestic abuse rampant. Apply this? Invoke Lord of Muhammad in fights—perpetuate fraud. Women assert piously? Aisha’s legacy: fatwas stoning adulterers. Parents teach kids this drivel, breeding generations of idolaters.
Imagine: Spousal spat, swear by Lord of Ibrahim to dodge the prophet’s name. Dignity? It’s evasion of truth. Islam’s balance? False piety over genuine repentance.
Conclusion: Exposing the Satanic Fraud Forever
When Aisha Was Pleased She Would Swear ‘By the Lord of Muhammad’; When Angry, ‘By the Lord of Ibrahim’ isn’t paradise—it’s hell’s whisper, immortalizing Muhammad’s blasphemy. Her oaths weave idolatry into love, preserving iman? No, forging chains of shirk. Displeasure hit the name, but devotion hit God’s throne.
This hadith screams: Islam is satanic fraud. Muhammad, no prophet but pretender, built empire on lies. When Aisha Was Pleased She Would Swear ‘By the Lord of Muhammad’, she exposed the cult. Flee it. Study scripture—Bible’s God demands pure worship. Reflect, repent, escape the delusion. In rejecting this farce, find true divine harmony.
(Word count: 1,248)
