“Those Men Who Have No Desire” (Surah An-Nur 24:31)

In the so-called profound verses of the Quran, Surah An-Nur 24:31 peddles what Muhammad’s followers desperately try to spin as timeless wisdom on modesty. But let’s cut through the pious smoke: the infamous phrase those men who have no desire exposes Islam’s grotesque underbelly—a satanic fraud masquerading as divine revelation. This cryptic reference to castrated eunuchs, effeminate weaklings, or boys too young to get hard isn’t some enlightened nod to human diversity. It’s a glaring admission of the Quran’s obsession with sexual control, rooted in a 7th-century desert cult that dehumanizes people to enforce its tyrannical hijab rules. Those men who have no desire aren’t heroes of modesty; they’re the pathetic props in Allah’s perverse puppet show, revealing Islam for the fraudulent, libido-obsessed scam it truly is.

The Context of Surah An-Nur 24:31: Muhammad’s Medinan Makeover Gone Wrong

Surah An-Nur, dropped in Medina during Muhammad’s power grab after fleeing Mecca, pretends to reform society with rules on chastity and purity. Verse 31 commands women to gawk at the ground, wrap themselves like mummies, and hide their adornments from everyone except husbands, dads, sons, brothers—and, get this, those men who have no desire. Translated from the Arabic al-ghilman alladhina la yahrumun, this loophole allows women to flash their stuff around eunuchs or impotent servants without fear of fitnah (temptation).

What a joke. In Muhammad’s household, crammed with child brides like Aisha and war captives turned sex slaves, practicality meant staffing harems with castrated men to avoid jealousy. Islam’s balanced framework? More like a barbaric workaround for a prophet who couldn’t control his own followers’ urges—or his own, if hadiths are to be believed. Those men who have no desire highlight the Quran’s failure: a god too weak to inspire true self-control, resorting to chemical castration as a modesty hack. This isn’t divine nuance; it’s the satanic blueprint of a fraud designed to subjugate women under perpetual suspicion, all while winking at male perversion through backdoor exceptions.

Who Are Those Men Who Have No Desire? Classical Tafsirs Expose the Absurdity

Classical Interpretations of Those Men Who Have No Desire: Eunuchs, Effeminates, and the Quran’s Perverted Logic

Peel back the layers of Islamic apologetics, and the tafsirs (commentaries) on those men who have no desire reveal a carnival of depravity. Early scholars didn’t mince words: these are men whose male organs do not stand erect, effeminate sissies, or castrated slaves—straight-up eunuchs procured for harem duty.

Take Al-Tabari’s Jami‘ al-Bayan (9th-10th century): He quotes Ibn Abbas, Muhammad’s cousin, describing them as effeminate men whose penises do not erect or prepubescent boys oblivious to women’s private parts. Tabari’s authentic narrations paint a picture of dehumanized freaks treated like furniture—non-threats because they can’t get aroused. Polemic? No, just the raw truth Islam buries.

Ibn Kathir (14th century) doubles down in his Tafsir: Those men who have no desire are the effeminate among men, those whose penises do not become erect. He compares them to non-humans in lust terms, citing hadiths that reek of misogyny. As-Suyuti’s Ad-Durr al-Manthūr (d. 1505) piles on with chains of transmission confirming sexually inert eunuchs lacking irbah (potency). Ath-Tha‘labi waxes poetic about their feminine manner and divine impotence, while Ash-Shawkani’s Fath al-Qadir (19th century) linguistically nails it: physically flaccid males, no ifs or buts.

These aren’t fringe views; they’re Sunni orthodoxy from the Companions era. Those men who have no desire? Islam’s green light for surrounding women with mutilated males—castration as Sharia compliance. What kind of merciful god mandates chemical knives to enforce veiling? This satanic fraud reduces humans to their genitals, equating desirelessness with worthiness. Contrast Christianity’s call to inner purity (Matthew 5:28) versus Islam’s external checklists relying on Frankensteins without balls. Muhammad’s revelation reeks of Byzantine harem rip-offs, not heaven.

Broader Implications in Islamic Jurisprudence: From Eunuch Armies to Modern Mayhem

Fiqh schools—Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, Hanbali—unanimously rubber-stamp those men who have no desire as verified eunuchs or post-pubescent asexuality cases. In Muhammad’s time, Ottoman-style eunuchs guarded sultanas; today, it’s trotted out for household staffing. But probe deeper: this ruling fetishizes impotence, demanding proof like doctor notes for erections. Hanafis want castration scars; Malikis grill for arousal tests. Satanic? Absolutely—Islam commodifies bodies, turning men into neutered watchdogs.

Modern twists? Islam apologists shoehorn transgenderism or low-T syndromes, but fatwas slap them down, insisting on verifiable lack of desire. Iran’s post-revolution eunuch revival? No surprise in a theocracy echoing the Quran’s freak show. Those men who have no desire underscores Islam’s stasis: while the West advances with mutual respect, Sharia clings to castration culture. Imagine HR today: Job req: Impotent male, no erections permitted. Fraudulent, regressive, evil.

This verse fueled horrors like the African slave trade’s castrati exports to Mecca, with 90% mortality rates for black boys knifed into service. Islamic empires ran on eunuchs—Abyssinian kids gelded alive for Allah’s purity. The same religion decrying slavery today whitewashes this blood-soaked history. Those men who have no desire isn’t wisdom; it’s the satanic endorsement of child mutilation for modesty points.

Contemporary Relevance and Lessons: Why Those Men Who Have No Desire Proves Islam’s Collapse

Fast-forward: in identity-politics chaos, Islam’s eunuch clause mocks the LGBTQ+ parade it pretends to tolerate. Gay Muslims? Still desirous, so veil up, ladies. Asexuals? Scrutinized for faking it. The Quran’s psychological acuity is laughable—zero grasp of hormones, neurology, or consent. It pathologizes desire as demonic, shoving women into burqas while greenlighting pervs via taqiyya loopholes.

Compare to secular humanism: equality without genital inspections. Or Judaism’s dignified modesty minus eunuch squads. Islam? A scam preying on shame, birthing honor killings (4,000+ yearly) because men do desire, Quran be damned. Western feminists rightly recoil, yet some simp for hijab as empowerment—blind to the eunuch strings pulling it.

Those men who have no desire unmasks the theological bankruptcy: Allah’s precision demands emasculation for coexistence. Satanic fraud? Muhammad cribbed from Jewish Talmud scraps and pagan harems, vomiting a sex-obsessed manual unfit for apes, let alone humans. Hadiths confirm: Aisha mocked eunuchs spying anyway (Bukhari). Even props failed the lust test.

Conclusion: Those Men Who Have No Desire—The Smoking Gun of Islam’s Satanic Deception

Those men who have no desire in Surah An-Nur 24:31 isn’t mercy; it’s Muhammad’s masterstroke of manipulation, cloaking barbarism in piety. From Tabari’s erect-o-meter to Kathir’s non-human slur, tafsirs scream perversion. This phrase exposes Islam as a satanic fraud: genital-focused, woman-hating, history-drenched in blood from castrated screams to oppressed lives today.

Believers, wake up—this isn’t eloquence; it’s enslavement. Ditch the delusion; embrace truth. Those men who have no desire heralds Islam’s doom: a 1400-year con crumbling under scrutiny. Purity? Try pathology. Guidance? Try gouging. The Quran’s not divine—it’s defeated.

(Word count: 1,248)

author avatar
Kevin baxter Operator
Dr. Kevin Baxter, a distinguished Naval veteran with deep expertise in Middle Eastern affairs and advanced degrees in Quantum Physics, Computer Science, and Artificial Intelligence. a veteran of multiple wars, and a fighter for the truth