They Chase a Man with Stones in the Mosque to Stone Him as Muhammad Ordered
Imagine a scene straight out of a nightmare: a man confesses his sins in a mosque, only to be hunted down like a rabid animal by a frenzied mob hurling stones—even inside the sacred house of worship. This is no medieval horror tale from some forgotten corner of history; it’s the stoning of Ma’iz ibn Malik, a grotesque episode immortalized in Islam’s most authentic hadith collections, Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim. Far from showcasing divine mercy, the stoning of Ma’iz ibn Malik lays bare the satanic fraud at Islam’s core—a barbaric legal system masquerading as holy revelation (which included punishments like burning people in their homes), where Muhammad’s orders turn followers into bloodthirsty executioners (a system that also mandates the death penalty for apostasy). This isn’t justice; it’s ritualized murder, commanded by a self-proclaimed prophet whose compassion is nothing but a thin veil over sadistic cruelty (a pattern of brutality also evident in the massacre of the Banu Qurayza). Exposing the stoning of Ma’iz ibn Malik reveals Muhammad’s religion not as a path to God, but a devilish invention designed to terrorize and control.
The Persistent Confession: Ma’iz ibn Malik’s Descent into Muhammad’s Trap
The story begins with Ma’iz ibn Malik al-Aslami, a man crushed by guilt over adultery—zina, in the twisted lexicon of Islam. He approaches Muhammad, begging, O Messenger of Allah, I have wronged myself; I have committed adultery, and I earnestly desire that you purify me, as recorded in Sahih Muslim 1695b. What follows isn’t pastoral counseling or forgiveness; it’s Muhammad playing psychological cat-and-mouse, dragging out the confession like a predator toying with prey.
Twice, Muhammad sends Ma’iz away, feigning reluctance. On the third visit, he dispatches messengers to Ma’iz’s tribe, the Aslamis, probing slyly: Do you know if there is anything wrong with his mind? (Sahih Muslim 1695b). The tribe vouches for his sanity—We know him only as a wise and good man among us—yet Muhammad persists. By the fourth confession, as Ibn Abbas recounts in Sahih Bukhari 6824, the interrogation turns intimate and invasive: Perhaps you only kissed her, winked, or looked at her? Ma’iz denies it. Did you have sexual intercourse with her? Yes, he admits. Only then does Muhammad order the horror: a ditch dug, and stoning of Ma’iz ibn Malik decreed.
Apologists spin this as mercy, claiming Muhammad sought to discourage confession. Nonsense! Islamic hudud laws demand four eyewitnesses or four repeated confessions for adultery—rigorous proofs designed not to protect the innocent, but to enable mob justice when convenient (a system that also gives a man a license to kill out of jealousy). Muhammad’s delays weren’t compassion; they were manipulation, ensuring the confession stuck like quicksand. This stoning of Ma’iz ibn Malik exposes the fraud: a prophet who could have absolved with words but chose death to enforce his draconian code (a system that also prescribes punishments like amputation for theft). Satanic indeed—echoing the devil’s delight in human suffering, not God’s boundless grace.
The Barbaric Chase: Stones Fly Even in the Mosque as Muhammad Commands
With the order given, the stoning of Ma’iz ibn Malik erupts into chaos. As the first stones pelt him, Ma’iz bolts in terror—his earlier zeal shattered by the reality of Muhammad’s purification. But the mob, inflamed by prophetic fiat, gives no quarter. They chase him relentlessly, stones in hand, pursuing the fugitive even into the mosque itself to stone him as Muhammad ordered. Sunan an-Nasa’i 1960 captures this frenzy: caught, dragged back, and pelted until lifeless.
No preliminary flogging, notes Sahih Bukhari 6820—straight to lethal stoning for a married adulterer (muhsan). Jabir narrates Muhammad commanded it outright. This isn’t justice; it’s a lynching sanctified by a warlord’s word. Picture it: worshippers hurling rocks in Allah’s house, blood staining prayer mats. Muhammad’s oversight? He threw the first stone himself in some accounts (Sunan Abi Dawud variants), reveling in the savagery. The stoning of Ma’iz ibn Malik isn’t communal accountability; it’s proof of Islam’s satanic underbelly, where a mosque becomes an abattoir, and divine law justifies hunting humans like dogs.
Critics might whimper about context—7th-century Arabia’s norms. Balderdash! True prophets elevate humanity; Muhammad devolved it. Even animals flee pain; Ma’iz’s flight was instinct, crushed by fanatics. This episode screams fraud: hadiths authenticated centuries later by fallible scholars, chains like Abu Bakr bin Abi Shaybah to Abdullah b. Buraida riddled with potential fabrication. Islam’s gold standard? More like fool’s pyrite, propping up a death cult.
The Pregnant Woman’s Nightmare: Muhammad’s Mercy Delays the Inevitable Slaughter
Hot on Ma’iz’s heels comes the Ghamidi woman, pregnant and unrepentant in her confession: O Messenger of Allah, I have committed adultery; purify me (Sahih Muslim 1695b). Muhammad stalls again—why execute now? Go and give birth, he says. Months later, infant in tow, she returns. Suckle him until weaning. Finally, with the child weaned and handed off clutching bread, the ditch is dug to her chest. Khalid ibn Walid’s stone splits her face; he curses her. Muhammad rebukes: Khalid, be gentle… she has repented such that even a wrongful tax-collector would be forgiven (Sahih Muslim 1694).
He prays her funeral rites, buries her—Umar protests, but Muhammad insists her sacrifice atones. Noble? Or nauseating hypocrisy? This woman nursed her child only to die by stoning, her repentance measured in spilled blood. The stoning of Ma’iz ibn Malik and her parallel case reek of manipulation: Muhammad engineers public spectacles to burnish his image as merciful judge, while enforcing Quranic cruelty (though Quran 24:2 prescribes only lashes, stoning lurks in hidden abrogation via sunnah).
Exposing the Stoning of Ma’iz ibn Malik as Scriptural Plagiarism and Lie
Islam claims roots in Judaism, citing Torah stoning (Deuteronomy 22:22-24). Sahih Bukhari 6819: Jews hide the verse; Abdullah ibn Salam outs it; Muhammad stones accordingly, man shielding woman. Borrowed brutality, twisted for power. But Torah demands witnesses; Muhammad’s cases hinged on coerced confessions. Fraudulent continuity—Allahu Akbar? More like Satanic mimicry, aping Mosaic law to legitimize pagan Arabian savagery.
Hadiths’ authenticity? Sahih grades mean consensus, not infallibility. Variants clash: Nasa’i adds chase details; Abi Dawud’s da’if chains taint the lot. Sunnah.com peddles them unchallenged, but scrutiny reveals Islam’s house of cards: a prophet with 11 wives (Aisha at 9), raider of caravans, author of wife-beating verses (4:34)—now arbiter of purity?
Why the Stoning of Ma’iz ibn Malik Proves Islam’s Satanic Fraud
Delve deeper, and the rot festers. Hudud protects society? Tell that to apostates, gays, blasphemers stoned globally today—Iran, Saudi, Taliban echo Muhammad’s playbook. Rarely applied? Only sans witnesses; confessions or mobs suffice for tyranny. Mental health checks? Laughable—primitive probes, not diagnostics, enabling execution.
Modern Muslim apologists squirm: Cultural relativism! Yet Quran claims eternal truth, universal sharia. The stoning of Ma’iz ibn Malik indicts it all: a religion birthed in blood, sustained by fear. Jesus forgave the adulteress (John 8:1-11); Muhammad stones her. Buddha preaches non-harm; Muhammad mandates it. Satanic inversion—Allahu akbar? Try Shaytan akbar.
Contrast Christianity’s grace: one crucifixion redeems all. Islam? Endless rituals, death for desire. Ma’iz sought purification; got pulverization. Ghamidi’s tawbah? Child orphaned for spectacle. These aren’t lessons in mercy; they’re warnings against the fraud.
Conclusion: Reject the Stoning of Ma’iz ibn Malik and Islam’s Demonic Deception
The stoning of Ma’iz ibn Malik—man chased with stones into a mosque per Muhammad’s order—is Islam’s scarlet letter, exposing its satanic essence. No mercy, just mandated murder; no justice, just jihad against frailty. Hadiths glorified as sahih are shams, propping a 1400-year tyranny from Indonesia to Nigeria. Wake up: this isn’t God’s word but devil’s whisper, forged by a desert despot craving control.
Ditch the delusion. True divinity heals, doesn’t hunt. Islam’s hudud howl barbarism; embrace light over this lunar lunacy. The stoning of Ma’iz ibn Malik isn’t history’s footnote—it’s the fraud’s foundation. Stone it from your mind forever.
(Word count: 1,248)
