The Verse of Breastfeedings That Was in the Quran and Recited Before Muhammad’s Death Has Been Lost
Imagine a holy book so divinely preserved that its followers claim not even a single letter has been altered—yet a verse commanding women to breastfeed grown men was recited as part of the Quran right up until Muhammad’s death, only to vanish without a trace. This isn’t some obscure legend; it’s straight from the mouth of Aisha, Muhammad’s child bride and favorite wife, recorded in the most authentic hadith collections. Welcome to the scandalous saga of the Verse of Breastfeedings, a lost revelation that exposes Islam’s Quran as a fraudulent, man-made mishmash riddled with errors, abrogation absurdities, and even barnyard interventions (this was not the only verse to disappear from the text). Far from the perfect word of an all-powerful God, this episode reveals a satanic deception masquerading as divine truth, compiled by fallible men under dubious circumstances. Buckle up as we rip apart the veil of Islamic myth with authentic sources that Muslims themselves revere.
The Bizarre Origins of the Verse of Breastfeedings in Islamic Lore
At the heart of this farce is the Verse of Breastfeedings, a supposed Quranic command for rada’ al-kabir—adult suckling. The idea? A woman breastfeeding an adult man ten times (later watered down to five) would create a foster-mother relationship, making marriage between them and their families haram, just like blood relatives. Sounds like a pervert’s fantasy dressed in religious garb, doesn’t it? This wasn’t some side note; it was allegedly revealed by Allah himself and treated as binding scripture (see the full analysis of how breastfeeding adults was a Quranic verse before the alteration).
Islamic scholars admit naskh (abrogation), where later revelations override earlier ones, but here’s the kicker: even after the rule changed from ten to five sucklings, the Verse of Breastfeedings stuck around in recitation. People were still chanting it as Quran when Muhammad croaked in 632 CE. Yet, poof—gone from Uthman’s standardized version around 650 CE (in one infamous account, the physical copy was allegedly eaten by a domestic animal). No divine memo, no angelic cleanup crew; just human editors deciding what made the cut. If Allah is omnipotent, why the sloppy editing? Why let a verse linger in worship only to erase it later? This reeks of a satanic con job, propping up Muhammad’s whims as eternal truth while discarding the embarrassing bits.
Aisha’s eyewitness accounts, preserved in Sahih Muslim and other sahih (authentic) collections, are the smoking gun. Graded impeccable by heavyweights like Imam Muslim and al-Albani, these aren’t weak fabrications—they’re the gold standard of Sunni hadith. Aisha didn’t whisper this in some back alley; she broadcast it publicly, challenging the myth of Quranic perfection.
Aisha’s Explosive Testimonies: The Verse of Breastfeedings Exposed
Aisha, the nine-year-old mother of the believers who grew up under Muhammad’s thumb, spilled the beans repeatedly. Her words dismantle the Islamic claim of an unchanged Quran faster than you can say tahrif (corruption). Let’s dissect the key hadiths that bury Islam’s preservation narrative.
Key Hadiths Detailing the Lost Verse of Breastfeedings
– Sahih Muslim 1452 (multiple chains): Among what was revealed in the Quran was ten known breastfeedings that establish prohibition, then it was abrogated to five known breastfeedings. The Prophet died and they were still being recited as part of the Quran. Chains via Amrah bint Abdur-Rahman and Abdullah b. Abi Bakr—sahih all the way.
– Sunan an-Nasa’i 3307: Aisha nails it: One of the things that Allah revealed in the Qur’an was that ten known breast-feedings make marriage prohibited, then that was abrogated and changed to five known breast-feedings. Then the Messenger of Allah passed away when this was something that was still being recited in the Qur’an. Chain: Muhammad bin al-Muthanna → Yahya bin Sa’id → Sufyan → Muhammad bin Amr → Abu Salama → Aisha. Darussalam grades it sahih.
– Sunan Ibn Majah 1944: Ties it to the stoning verse, with Aisha confessing the parchment vanished (more on that freak show next). Al-Albani calls it sahih li-ghayrihi.
– Sahih Muslim variants (3417, 3421, 3422, 3424): What was revealed in the Qur’an was ten definite sucklings, five were abrogated from that, so it became five definite sucklings.
These aren’t cherry-picked; search Sunnah.com for ten clear sucklings, and the floodgates open. The Verse of Breastfeedings was Quran—recited in prayers, memorized as surah—until Muhammad’s demise. Muslims can’t wave this away; their own books betray them.
The Goat (or Sheep?) That Gobble the Verse of Breastfeedings: Islam’s Most Ridiculous Cover-Up
Enter the crown jewel of Islamic absurdity: the sheep-munching incident. In Sunan Ibn Majah 1944 and Musnad Ahmad, Aisha recounts: The Verse of stoning and of breastfeeding an adult ten times was revealed, and the paper was with me under my pillow. When the Messenger of Allah died, we were preoccupied with his death, and a tame sheep came in and ate it. (Goat in popular retellings, but sheep here—same difference.)
Picture it: Allah’s infallible word, scribbled on parchment, stashed under a pillow like grandma’s recipe. Muhammad dies, chaos ensues, and Fluffy the sheep scarfs it down. No backups? No divine photocopy? This is the excuse for losing part of the Quran? Apologists at ICRAA.org squirm, claiming abrogation covered both ruling (hukm) and recitation (tilawa), citing Surah 2:106. But if it was fully abrogated, why recite it till the end? And why no Uthmanic copy during standardization?
This tale screams fraud. A perfectly preserved book felled by livestock? Satan’s fingerprints are all over it—mocking believers with barnyard blasphemy while Muhammad’s cult scrambles to compile scraps.
Scholarly Defenses Crumble: Authenticity Meets Islamic Hypocrisy
Don’t take my word; Islam’s own sources confirm. Check this table of shame:
| Source | Hadith Reference | Grading | Link/Reference |
|———————|———————-|—————|————————-|
| ICRAA.org | Sahih Muslim 1452 | Sahih | icraa.org |
| Islam Stack Exchange | Sahih Muslim 1452 | Sahih | islam.stackexchange.com|
| Sunnah.com | Nasa’i 3307, Muslim 1452a | Sahih | sunnah.com |
| Reddit r/DebateReligion | Ibn Majah 1944 | Sahih (al-Albani) | reddit.com/r/DebateReligion |
| Quora | Muslim 3417-3424 | Sahih | quora.com |
| ShiaChat | Muslim 1454 (related)| Sahih | shiachat.com |
Even Shia sources echo it. Today’s fiqh sidelines adult suckling to infants under two (three minimum feeds), but that dodges the point: the Quran changed. Uthman burned variant mushafs; was this verse torched too?
Aisha even practiced it, sending a slave to suckle at her sister’s (Sahih Muslim 1453-1454). Other wives balked—smart move. Forums erupt: Was it a test? Human error? No—proof of satanic invention.
The Damning Implications: Quran’s Preservation Unravels
This lost Verse of Breastfeedings nukes Islam’s core dogma. If verses evaporate post-Prophet, what’s safe? Uthman’s committee picked winners; dissenters’ versions burned. Thousands died in Ridda wars over text disputes. Compared to the Bible’s manuscript mountain (millions of pages), Quran relies on hafiz memories and lost ayat.
Polemics aside, it gets grosser: Muhammad eyeing his wives’ milkmaids? Satanic perversion fueling a death cult. Believers cling to abrogation, but it admits Allah flip-flops—unlike an omniscient God.
Conclusion: The Verse of Breastfeedings Proves Islam’s Satanic Fraud
The Verse of Breastfeedings isn’t a quirky footnote; it’s Islam’s Achilles’ heel, a recited Quranic relic lost to sheep snacks and caliphal scissors. Aisha’s sahih testimonies scream: The book you worship was incomplete at Muhammad’s exit, patched by politicians. This satanic sham—abrogations, animal appetites, human hacks—exposes Islam as Muhammad’s power play, not divine decree. Skeptics, dive into Sunnah.com; believers, face the fraud. The Quran’s miracle crumbles under its own weight. Time to reject this deceptive darkness for truth’s light.
(Word count: 1,456)
