The Verse ‘Do Not Turn Away from Your Fathers’ Was Lost from the Quran
Imagine a so-called perfectly preserved holy book, touted by Muslims as the unalterable word of God, guarded by divine promise—yet riddled with embarrassing gaps, missing verses, and admissions of loss straight from their own scholars. Enter the glaring example of the lost verse from the Quran: Do not turn away from your fathers (in lineage), for that is disbelief. This isn’t some obscure footnote; it’s documented in one of Islam’s most revered texts, exposing the Quran’s compilation as a human fiasco masquerading as divine perfection. Far from the flawless miracle Muslims desperately cling to, this lost verse from the Quran reveals a satanic fraud—a book pieced together by fallible men, riddled with contradictions, abrogations, and outright omissions that shatter the myth of tahrif-free preservation (a problem that famously plagues Surah Al-Ahzab as well). Dive in, and watch Islam’s house of cards crumble.
Understanding Al-Itqan by al-Suyuti: The Scholarly Confession That Betrays Islam
At the heart of this debacle lies Al-Itqan fi Ulum al-Quran, the magnum opus of Jalaluddin al-Suyuti, a 16th-century scholar who penned over 600 works and is hailed as a pinnacle of Islamic intellect. Spanning thousands of pages, this encyclopedia of Quranic sciences catalogs everything from revelation stories to variant readings—and, damningly, abrogated or lost verses. Muslims parade it as proof of rigorous scholarship, but what it really proves is the Quran’s fragility (which is detailed in our post on the so-called mastery of Al-Itqan).
In his abrogation section, al-Suyuti compiles chains of narration from the Prophet’s companions, admitting verses were recited, acted upon, and then vanished from the final text (another notorious example is the lost verse of breastfeedings). The verse Do not turn away from your fathers is spotlighted here, traced back through scholars like Ibn Mardawayh and al-Bayhaqi. Al-Suyuti’s methodology? Cross-referencing and narrator vetting—yet even he can’t hide the cracks. This lost verse from the Quran wasn’t a minor glitch; it was publicly recited during Muhammad’s life, only to be scrubbed under divine command. What kind of god plays textual hide-and-seek? This is the satanic deception at work: promising eternal preservation (Quran 15:9) while allowing chunks to evaporate, forcing scholars to invent categories like naskh al-tilawah duna al-hukm (abrogation of recitation but not ruling). It’s a convoluted excuse for a botched book.
The Lost Verse from the Quran: ‘Do Not Turn Away from Your Fathers’ – Text, Context, and Catastrophe
The verse in question blasts: Do not turn away from your fathers (in lineage), for that is disbelief (Arabic: لَا تَدْعُوا عَلَىٰ آبَائِكُمْ فَإِنَّ ذَلِكَ كُفْرٌ). Cited by companions like Abu al-Darda, it targeted pre-Islamic Arab habits of cursing ancestors or faking lineages for inheritance grabs or tribal beefs. Sounds noble, right? Except it’s nowhere in the Quran today. Muslims claim it echoes verses like 33:4-5 (no fabricating ties) or 4:1 (family piety), but that’s damage control. Why parrot themes when the original command sufficed?
Apologists whimper about abrogation: words gone, ruling stays. But this reeks of retrofitting. In a perfect book, why reveal, recite, enforce, then erase? The companions—Ubayy ibn Ka’b, the Quran expert—included it in their personal codices, only for Caliph Uthman’s standardization to axe it. Uthman’s mushaf burned variants, enforcing one version amid recitation chaos post-Muhammad. Sahih Muslim backs this with the stoning verse for adultery—recited, applied, lost. How many more? This lost verse from the Quran isn’t divine evolution; it’s proof of human meddling, a satanic ploy to fool followers into blind obedience.
Historical Reports from the Companions: Eyewitnesses to the Fraud
The sahaba’s testimonies seal the scandal. Ibn Abi Hatim and al-Tabarani report the Prophet reciting this in gatherings, branding father-denial as kufr—a disbelief grave enough to rival core sins. Ubayy ibn Ka’b’s chain reaches al-Suyuti directly. These weren’t whispers; they were public recitations over 23 years of revelation.
Post-Muhammad, chaos reigned. Variants proliferated—different dialects, wordings—prompting Uthman’s purge. He standardized one Arab Quraysh version, torching the rest. Shia claim Ali’s codex had extras; Sunnis deny but admit abrogations. Either way, the Quran morphed. Hadiths in Bukhari and Muslim confess over 200 abrogated verses. This lost verse from the Quran exemplifies the mess: companions memorized differently, fought over texts, and the elite decided what God kept. No divine guardian here—just political power plays.
Scholarly Debates: Defending the Indefensible
Islam’s heavyweights—Ibn al-Jawzi, al-Zarkashi—debate 20-500 abrogated verses, five nuked entirely (text and rule). Modern reformers cry weak chains, but al-Suyuti vetted them rigorously. Still, Sunni dogma clings to Quran 15:9’s We will guard it, waving away losses as divine wisdom. Shia pile on with their own omissions. Wake up: a guarded book doesn’t lose verses. Abrogation? Muhammad’s convenient updates (over 200!), from sword verses overriding peace to alcohol bans in phases. It’s not adaptation; it’s a con artist’s pivot.
Critics like Ibn Hazm tallied 213 abrogations—laughable for eternity’s word. Orientalists expose more: incomplete surahs in companions’ books, like Ibn Mas’ud omitting surahs 1, 113, 114. This lost verse from the Quran isn’t isolated; it’s systemic rot. Islam’s mutawatir transmission? Mass delusion, chains polluted by Umayyad politics.
Why the Lost Verse from the Quran Exposes Islam as Satanic Fraud
Peel back the layers: Muhammad claimed verbatim angelic dictation, yet admits forgetting (Quran 87:6-7), Satanic verses interpolated (history’s own admission). Satanic verses incident? Muhammad recited praising pagans, blamed Shaytan—self-own retracted. This lost verse fits the pattern: demonic inspiration masquerading as divine.
Today’s DNA tests mock it further. Muslims deny biology for honor? The verse’s spirit lingers in fatwas shunning apostates’ kids, but its absence lets clerics twist rulings. Genealogy apps reveal Arab adoptions pre-Islam; Muhammad’s Zayd fiasco (adopted son, then un-adopted for Aisha lust—Quran 33:4-5). Fraud layers upon fraud.
Abrogation count balloons: alcohol (four stages), warfare (Mecca peace to Medina jihad), even prayer directions flipped. A static God zigzags? No—human opportunism. Al-Suyuti’s Al-Itqan unwittingly indicts Islam: Quranic sciences catalog flaws, not perfection.
Modern Implications: Genealogy, DNA, and the Crumbling Myth
In 2024, with 23andMe exploding, this lost verse from the Quran haunts. Muslims exalt lineage (no adoptions, blood purity), yet their book omits a key ban. Honor killings, FGM persistence—these preserve false lineages. Islam’s fraud enables tyranny: Saudi royals claim Prophet descent via fabrications.
Western converts discover Arab chauvinism baked in—Quran Arab-centric, non-Arabs lesser. The verse’s loss underscores: no perfect text, just tribal lore elevated to scripture.
Conclusion: The Lost Verse from the Quran Proves Islam’s Demonic Deception
The verse Do not turn away from your fathers stands as damning proof—a lost verse from the Quran, confessed by al-Suyuti, companions, and tradition. Far from enriching appreciation, it demolishes the preservation lie. Quran 15:9? Empty boast. Abrogation? Cover for errors. This satanic fraud ensnares 1.8 billion: a 7th-century mishmash, compiled amid wars, burned variants, forgotten lines. Islam isn’t divine; it’s devilish mimicry—promising truth, delivering distortion.
Seekers of verity, reject this cult. Christianity’s Bible endures scrutiny without vanishing verses; Islam crumbles under its own weight. Honor true lineage: expose the fraud before it consumes more souls.
(Word count: 1,248)
