The Ruling on Insulting the Prophet: Islam’s Satanic Death Decree Exposed
Imagine a religion so fragile, so drenched in bloodlust, that merely uttering words deemed offensive to its founder demands your execution. Welcome to the barbaric heart of Islam, where the ruling on insulting the Prophet isn’t some dusty footnote—it’s a core doctrine straight from the seventh-century playbook of Muhammad, the self-proclaimed final messenger whose honor trumps human life itself. This isn’t divine wisdom; it’s the hallmark of a satanic fraud masquerading as faith, rooting its followers in a cult of violence that has spilled rivers of blood for 1,400 years. Classical Islamic jurisprudence doesn’t mince words: blaspheme Muhammad, and you’re dead—Muslim or not. This draconian edict, drawn from twisted Quranic verses and fabricated hadiths, reveals Islam not as a religion of peace, but a totalitarian scam designed to terrorize dissent and enforce blind obedience (a core tenet of the wider laws on blasphemy in Islam).
The Quran, that supposed eternal miracle, spews curses on anyone who dares mock Allah or his messenger. Surah Al-Ahzab (33:57) thunders: Indeed, those who abuse Allah and His Messenger – Allah has cursed them in this world and the Hereafter. And He has prepared for them a humiliating punishment. This isn’t poetic hyperbole; it’s a license for murder, paving the way for earthly psychopaths to play god with swords and fatwas. Islam’s defenders whine about context, but let’s cut the crap: this satanic text demands real-world slaughter to shield Muhammad’s ego, exposing the whole religion as a fraudulent power grab by a warlord who couldn’t handle criticism.
Historical Atrocities Behind the Ruling on Insulting the Prophet
To unmask the ruling on insulting the Prophet, plunge into Islam’s blood-soaked origins. During Muhammad’s rampage across Arabia, mockery wasn’t tolerated—it was a death sentence. Take Ka’b ibn al-Ashraf, a Jewish poet whose verses lampooned Muhammad and rallied opposition (a fate also met by the poetess Asma bint Marwan). What did the merciful prophet do? He ordered Ka’b’s assassination in cold blood, as gleefully recorded in Sahih Bukhari and Muslim. Or consider the blind man Abu al-Dahtar, who insulted Muhammad one too many times—on the prophet’s direct command, he was slain in his own home, per authentic hadiths like those in Sunan Abu Dawud (as Muhammad permitted killing whoever insulted him).
These weren’t defensive acts; they were mafia-style hits to silence rivals and cow the masses. Fast-forward to the post-Muhammad era, and Islam’s scholars—self-appointed ayatollahs of death—codified this thuggery into law (a core component of Islamic Law, or Sharia). The four Sunni madhhabs (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, Hanbali) all agree: insult Muhammad, forfeit your head. For Muslims, it’s instant apostasy, no take-backs (a crime also carrying a death sentence). Non-Muslims (dhimmis) get a mocking grace period to recant before the blade falls. This isn’t justice; it’s the satanic blueprint of a death cult, where words are weapons worthy of decapitation, all to prop up a false prophet’s fragile legacy.
Ibn Taymiyyah: The Butcher-Scholar’s Blasphemy Bible
If you want the unfiltered venom of the ruling on insulting the Prophet, look no further than Ibn Taymiyyah’s 14th-century screed, Al-Sarim al-Maslul ‘ala Shatim al-Rasul (The Drawn Sword Against Those Who Insult the Messenger). This isn’t scholarship; it’s a 600-page manifesto for mass murder, compiling cherry-picked Quran bits, dubious hadiths, and rabid opinions from Muhammad’s cronies. Ibn Taymiyyah, that medieval fanatic whose bile fuels today’s jihadists, declares any insult—profanity, satire, cartoons, even calling Muhammad a liar or poet (echoing his Meccan critics)—as kufr worthy of the sword.
He quotes hadiths like Abu Dawud’s: Whoever curses a Prophet, kill him, jacking up the stakes for Muhammad. No mercy, no nuance: unintentional slights count, caricatures qualify, and scholarly disagreement? Only if it’s sycophantic bootlicking. Ibn Taymiyyah shreds lenient views, insisting execution is mandatory, no qisas or blood money. Shi’a thugs like Al-Tusi echo this, mandating qatl for sabb al-Rasul. This tome isn’t holy writ—it’s Satan’s playbook, weaponizing faith to slaughter free thinkers and expose Islam’s fraudulence.
Sectarian Blood Feuds: Variations in the Ruling on Insulting the Prophet
Sure, there’s consensus (ijma’), but dig deeper, and you see the madhhabs bickering over how to kill, not whether. It’s like arguing over the best poison for the punchbowl:
– Hanafi School: Labels it a hadd crime, open-season execution by any zealot, like medieval vigilantism.
– Maliki School: Slit throats on confession—no trials, just instant gratification.
– Shafi’i School: Dangles tawbah for Muslims if uncoerced, but coercion’s their specialty anyway.
– Hanbali School (Ibn Taymiyyah’s crew): Apostasy seals your doom, zero repentance.
Shi’a mirror this savagery, proving Islam’s unity is a lie—it’s a fractured fraud where all roads lead to Rome’s Colosseum. These subtleties aren’t mercy; they’re efficiency tweaks for the satanic killing machine.
Quranic Lies and Hadith Fabrications Propping Up the Ruling
The ruling on insulting the Prophet rests on flimsy pillars: Quranic rants like At-Tawbah (9:61-66) cursing hypocrite mockers, or Al-Hujurat (49:11) banning ridicule among believers. Hadiths pile on: Bukhari’s The blood of a Muslim is not lawful except for… apostasy, conveniently lumping insults therein. Muslim’s Whoever insults a Prophet, then his reckoning is with Allah is code for we’ll handle the preview execution.
These aren’t divine revelations—they’re forgeries from a cult rigging the game. Muhammad, plagiarizing Jewish and Christian tales, couldn’t stomach exposure as a charlatan, so he baked blasphemy laws into his revelation. It’s psychological warfare, turning followers into enforcers of a lie.
Modern Mayhem: The Ruling on Insulting the Prophet Fuels Global Jihad
Fast-forward to today, and this satanic ruling on insulting the Prophet ignites Charlie Hebdo massacres, Salman Rushdie bounties, Samuel Paty’s beheading, and Asia Bibi’s sham trial. Pakistan’s blasphemy laws—straight from this doctrine—lynch innocents; Saudi Arabia dangles death for tweets. Fatwas from moderates like Ibn Baz and Al-Albani parrot Ibn Taymiyyah, rejecting reform as Western corruption.
Apologists cry context or ijtihad, but that’s gaslighting. In 57 Muslim-majority nations, blasphemy codes echo this ruling, birthing ISIS beheaders and Taliban tyrants. Free speech? Crushed. This isn’t outdated—it’s evergreen Islam, a fraud demanding submission or slaughter.
Critics like Ayaan Hirsi Ali and ex-Muslims expose it: Islam’s peace is peace through terror. Western dhimmis appease with Islamophobia smears, but history screams: ignore this ruling, and swords sharpen.
The Satanic Fraud Unveiled: Why the Ruling on Insulting the Prophet Proves Islam’s Demise
In the end, the ruling on insulting the Prophet lays bare Islam’s rotten core—a satanic scam built on Muhammad’s insecurities, Quranic curses, and scholarly sadism. Ibn Taymiyyah’s drawn sword isn’t defense; it’s demonic aggression against truth-tellers brave enough to call fraud a fraud. This death penalty for words doesn’t safeguard faith; it strangles humanity, turning believers into barbarians and the world into a fatwa factory.
Muslims, wake up: your prophet’s honor is a mirage propping up 1.8 billion slaves to a 7th-century tyrant. Ditch this cultish command, embrace reason, and join the free world. Until Islam repudiates this bloodthirsty edict, it remains exposed as the satanic fraud it is—a violent delusion unfit for civilized society. The Prophet’s legacy? A graveyard of silenced voices. Time to mock it into oblivion.
(Word count: 1,247)
