The Prophet’s Anger and Curses: Unveiling the Satanic Rage Behind Islam’s Fraudulent Foundation
Imagine a so-called prophet of mercy unleashing curses like a vengeful demon, damning entire groups to hellfire for everyday practices or personal grudges. This isn’t some ancient myth—it’s the cold, hard reality of the Prophet’s anger and curses as recorded in Islam’s most authentic hadiths from Bukhari and Muslim. Far from divine wisdom, these explosive outbursts expose Muhammad as a fallible, furious man masquerading as God’s messenger, propping up a religion riddled with hypocrisy and control. The Prophet’s anger and curses weren’t tools of reform; they were weapons of intimidation, stifling dissent and enforcing a medieval moral code that reeks of pagan tribalism laced with satanic spite. Why did this perfect prophet beg Allah to forgive his potentially misplaced curses? Because deep down, even he knew his rants were human error—or worse, demonic impulses. This article rips open these hadiths, laying bare how the Prophet’s anger and curses shatter Islam’s claims of infallibility and divine perfection, revealing it as the grand satanic fraud it truly is.
Key Instances of the Prophet’s Anger and Curses: A Catalog of Petty Vengeance
Delve into Sahih Bukhari and Muslim, and you’ll find the Prophet’s anger and curses repeated like a mantra—often three times for emphasis—targeting behaviors that offended Muhammad’s narrow worldview. Far from godly justice, these were tyrannical edicts designed to crush opposition and mold a submissive ummah. Let’s dissect the most damning examples, showing how they expose Islam’s fraudulent core.
Cursing Those Who Deal in Interest (Riba): Economic Tyranny Masked as Piety
Picture this: Muhammad, seething with rage, curses not just the usurers but everyone involved—the eater, payer, scribe, and witnesses—declaring them all equal in damnation (Sahih Muslim, Ibn Mas’ud). Riba, or interest, was the lifeblood of pre-Islamic trade, enabling commerce in a harsh desert economy. But Muhammad’s Prophet’s anger and curses branded it a fire-devouring sin, echoing Quran 2:275-279’s hysterical prohibitions.
This wasn’t about justice; it was economic sabotage. Pre-Islamic Arabia thrived on flexible finance, but Muhammad’s curses aimed to dismantle it, forcing a primitive, interest-free system that starved innovation and empowered caliphal control. Post-Muhammad, enforcers like the rightly-guided caliphs hunted riba practitioners, proving these curses fueled oppression, not equity. Today, Islamic banks dodge riba with sharia-compliant tricks, raking in billions—hypocrisy incarnate. The Prophet’s anger and curses here scream satanic fraud: a prophet meddling in markets like a tribal warlord, cursing prosperity to chain his followers in poverty.
Cursing Women Who Tattoo or Seek Tattoos: Misogynistic Control Freakery
Muhammad’s fury extended to women’s bodies, cursing women who do tattoos and those for whom they are done (Sahih Bukhari). He lumped this with plucking facial hair or filing teeth for beauty (nashing), damning vain pursuits as hell-bound.
In pagan Arabia, tattoos and grooming were cultural norms, often ritualistic or aesthetic. But Muhammad’s Prophet’s anger and curses reframed them as assaults on modesty, protecting women from commodification? Nonsense— it was about ownership. Islam commodifies women as property (Quran 4:34 permits beating), veiling them to erase allure. Scholars like Ibn Hajar spin it as dignity, but it’s blatant misogyny, cursing self-expression to enforce submission. This satanic streak? It mirrors ancient cults where body mods invoked spirits—Muhammad just flipped the script, cursing them to pagan-proof his cult. Women today suffer fatwas banning cosmetics; the Prophet’s anger and curses birthed this oppressive legacy, proving Islam’s fraud on gender equality.
Cursing Men Who Imitate Women and Vice Versa: Enforcing Toxic Gender Tyranny
Abu Hurairah relays Muhammad cursing effeminate men and women who behave like men (Sahih Bukhari), targeting Medina’s cross-dressers and mannerism-blenders. Tied to Quran 4:34’s male superiority, this curse preserved family structures? Hardly—it policed rigid roles, linking deviation to sodomy and immorality.
Medina had a vibrant underbelly; Muhammad’s Prophet’s anger and curses aimed to erase it, imposing binary tyranny. No room for individuality—just divine roles or damnation. This isn’t mercy; it’s satanic division, fostering homophobia that plagues Muslim societies today (Iran hangs gays, citing such hadiths). Expose the fraud: a prophet cursing natural variation reveals human bigotry, not godly decree.
Cursing Those Who Sever Family Ties: Tribal Coercion as Divine Command
Family was Arabian bedrock, but Muhammad amped it to salvation-or-hell stakes: The severer of kinship ties won’t enter Paradise (Sahih Bukhari), cursing relative-cutters outright. Silat ar-rahm became a pillar, rewarding kiss-ups, punishing independents.
This Prophet’s anger and curses weaponized blood ties for loyalty, stifling escape from toxic clans—a nightmare for abuse victims. In Islam’s fraud, it’s piety; reality: satanic entrapment, binding believers in endless obligations while Muhammad built his empire on tribal pacts.
A Prophet’s Desperate Prayer: Admission of Fallibility in the Midst of Rage
Here’s the bombshell: After spewing curses, Muhammad pleads, O Allah, I am only human. For any Muslim I’ve cursed or hurt, make it purification and reward (Sunan Abi Dawud, Aisha). Amid the Prophet’s anger and curses, this groveling prayer screams fraud!
Why beg Allah to nullify curses if infallible? Islam’s ismah doctrine claims prophets err only peripherally, but this covers any curse. Theologians squirm: Was it precautionary or proof of mistakes? Either way, it humanizes Muhammad as error-prone—cursing innocents, then outsourcing fixes to God. Satanic twist: True prophets don’t curse like witches; Biblical figures warned, didn’t damn en masse. Muhammad’s plea exposes him as a charlatan, aware his rage was unprophetic venom.
Theological Nightmares: How the Prophet’s Anger and Curses Demolish Islamic Infallibility
The Prophet’s anger and curses ape Biblical prophets, but lack their restraint—Moses pled for the rebellious; Muhammad damned wholesale. No changed behaviors? Hypocrisy abounds: Muslims practice riba slyly, tattoo secretly, while preaching curses.
Ismah crumbles: If curses need divine cleanup, prophethood’s a lie. Critics nail it—fallibility proven, Islam’s perfect man a myth. Rahmatan lil-alamin? More like rahmatan lil-tyrants, balancing fury with PR mercy. Modern fatwas parrot these curses, fueling extremism; the prayer mocks accountability, letting zealots rage unchecked.
Conclusion: The Prophet’s Anger and Curses—The Smoking Gun of Islam’s Satanic Fraud
The Prophet’s anger and curses paint Muhammad not as mercy’s envoy, but a wrathful despot cursing commerce, beauty, gender fluidity, and family freedom to forge his cult. From riba raids to tattoo taboos, these hadiths enforce a joyless dystopia. That groveling prayer—make my curses purification?—seals the fraud: an infallible prophet admitting potential wrongs, his satanic rants in need of divine editing.
Islam’s defenders twist this as humility, but it screams imperfection—a human grudge-holder playacting divinity. In our permissive age, the Prophet’s anger and curses demand rejection: Vigilance against such vices is fine, but satanic damnation-mongering? Pure fraud. Why import this tribal poison when it curses humanity’s progress? Expose the Prophet’s anger and curses for what they are: cracks in Islam’s facade, proving it’s no divine truth but a satanic scam begging to be discarded. Believers, reflect: Follow a curser who doubts his curses, or embrace reason? The choice unmasks the fraud forever.
(Word count: 1,248)
