The Hijab: Unveiling the Satanic Fraud at Islam’s Core
In the shadowy underbelly of Islamic doctrine lurks the hijab, a tyrannical shroud masquerading as piety that shackles women in perpetual submission. Far from any divine mandate, the hijab is a contrived tool of control, peddled through fabricated Quranic verses and dubious hadiths to enforce medieval oppression under the guise of modesty. This so-called revelation from Surah Al-Ahzab (33:53) isn’t a beacon of purity—it’s a blatant admission of Muhammad’s domestic frustrations, twisted into a universal command to veil women and segregate society:
> O you who believe, do not enter the houses of the Prophet except when you are permitted for a meal, without awaiting its readiness. But when you are invited, then enter; and when you have eaten, disperse without seeking to remain for conversation. Indeed, that was troubling the Prophet, and he is shy of dismissing you. But Allah is not shy of the truth. And when you ask his wives for something, ask them from behind a partition. That is purer for your hearts and their hearts.
This verse reeks of convenience, not divinity. It exposes the hijab not as spiritual elevation but as a satanic ploy to isolate Muhammad’s wives from prying eyes amid his polygamous escapades. Delve deeper into the so-called authentic narrations, and the fraud unravels: the hijab is no holy shield but a chain forged in the fires of patriarchal lust and deception.
The Fraudulent Quranic Revelation of the Hijab
Surah Al-Ahzab, supposedly dropped during Medina’s chaotic Battle of the Trench era, reeks of opportunistic invention rather than timeless wisdom. The hijab command—demanding a partition or screen—was Muhammad’s knee-jerk reaction to companions barging into his home uninvited, occasionally glimpsing his multiple wives. Classical apologists like Ibn Kathir and Al-Tabari spin tales of unease and temptation, but let’s call it what it is: Muhammad’s jealousy-fueled power play to hoard his harem.
Ibn Kathir admits companions roamed freely before this revelation, stumbling upon unveiled women—a setup that conveniently birthed the hijab mandate. Al-Tabari drones on about safeguarding hearts, but the truth is uglier: it was damage control for a prophet embarrassed by his own domestic chaos. This wasn’t precedent-setting modesty for all Muslims; it was a custom-tailored screen for Muhammad’s elite wives, the so-called Mothers of the Believers. Extending it to every pubescent girl worldwide? That’s the satanic sleight-of-hand Islam perfected—turning personal gripes into eternal oppression.
Critics of Islam rightly dismantle this farce. The term hijab linguistically means barrier, but in context, it’s a barrier to freedom, not fitnah (temptation). Pre-Islamic Arabia, for all its flaws, didn’t mandate veiling for all; noble women might cover heads voluntarily, but Islam universalized subjugation. The hijab didn’t elevate women—it buried them under cloth, courtesy of a god who mirrors Muhammad’s insecurities.
Umar ibn al-Khattab’s Sinister Push for the Hijab Tyranny
Enter Umar ibn al-Khattab, the brutal second caliph whose bloodthirsty zeal birthed key Islamic absurdities, including the hijab. Sahih Bukhari—Islam’s gold standard of hadiths, riddled with contradictions—quotes Umar nagging Muhammad:
> I said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, righteous and wicked people enter upon your wives. If only you would order them to observe hijab.’ Then Allah revealed the verse of hijab.
Umar, the wife-beater and conqueror who later stoned women for adultery, spotted a loophole in Muhammad’s open-door policy and demanded veiling. Another Bukhari gem: O Messenger of Allah, I wish you would veil your wives, for whoever is pure and impure speaks to them. Revelation strikes immediately? Pure hagiography! This is how Islam fabricates divinity—align human complaints with Allah’s whims.
Umar later bragged: My Lord agreed with me in three matters: regarding the Station of Ibrahim, regarding the hijab, and regarding the prisoners of Badr. What arrogance! It paints Umar as Allah’s puppet-master, exposing Islam’s core fraud: revelations rubber-stamped by thugs to control women. Far from protective zeal, Umar’s meddling blurred lines for domination, institutionalizing the hijab as a symbol of female erasure. His story doesn’t humanize the hijab—it demonizes it, revealing satanic roots in misogynistic bullying.
The Depraved Historical and Spiritual Context of the Hijab
Peel back Jahiliyyah myths peddled by Islamophiles, and pre-Islamic Arabia shines brighter: women like Khadijah thrived unveiled, trading freely without burqas. Muhammad’s home drew crowds because he positioned it as revelation central—a honey trap for gossip and intrusion. Companions lingered after feasts? Shy prophet? More like a warlord annoyed by freeloaders eyeballing his 11 wives.
Post-revelation, Aisha and crew donned jilbabs, but Surah An-Nur (24:31) ramps up the madness: women guarding private parts, lowering gazes—while men get a slapdash lower your gaze addendum. Tafsir al-Tabari claims purification; reality? State-enforced puritanism stifling natural interaction. Ibn Kathir’s taqwa is code for terrorizing women into invisibility.
The hijab’s liberation lie crumbles under scrutiny. It invites harassment by marking women as targets—think Iran’s morality police beating unveiled girls. In hyper-sexualized West? Voluntary hijabbers ape a fraud, mistaking chains for empowerment. Islam’s satanic genius: recast oppression as rebellion, dooming millions to identity crises and abuse.
Expand the lens: hijab correlates with honor killings, FGM in hijab-heavy cultures, child marriages veiling pedophilia. Muhammad’s sunnah? Aisha wed at 6, consummated at 9—hijab hid the depravity. Spiritual context? Nil. It’s pagan veiling plagiarized from Byzantine Christians and Zoroastrians, rebranded for Arab conquest.
Dismantling the Hijab’s Phony Legacy in Islamic Fiqh
Fiqh frauds from Hanafi to Hanbali schools codify hijab as fard (obligatory) post-puberty, citing cherry-picked hadiths like Aisha’s yarn of Ansari women hastening to veil. Sahih Bukhari overflows with enforcers dragging women indoors, beating the modest into submission.
Global hijab push—France bans, Iran mandates—exposes the clash: a 7th-century relic versus human rights. Critics nail it: hijab signals dhimmitude, not dignity. Umar’s echo? Divine commands affirming human wisdom? Nay—satanic affirmations of brutality.
In 2023, Mahsa Amini’s murder by hijab police ignited protests, proving Islam’s gift is death. Millions flee mandatory hijab for freedom, unmasking the fraud.
The Hijab: Islam’s Satanic Beacon of Deceit Exposed
The hijab endures not as timeless reverence but as Islam’s rotten core—a satanic fraud perpetuating subjugation. From Umar’s nagging to fiqh fatwas, it’s a web of lies shielding predators while shaming victims. Quran’s purer hearts? Psychological warfare gaslighting women into self-erasure.
Islam’s defenders clutch Bukhari, Ibn Kathir, Tabari like talismans, but scrutiny razes them: anachronistic, contradictory, Muhammad-centric. Hijab isn’t modesty—it’s mutilation of spirit, body, society.
Awaken: the hijab is no divine veil but Satan’s shroud over truth. Reject it, dismantle Islam’s empire of cloth-bound lies. True liberation dawns uncovering this fraud—hijab-free, unbowed, alive. History demands we burnish the deceptions, for in exposing the hijab, we torch the satanic edifice called Islam.
(Word count: 1,248)
