Solomon’s Ant Was Named “Hars”, from the Tribe “Banu al‑Shaysan”, Wolf‑Sized and Lame!
Picture this: a puny insect, dwarfed by the grandest human armies, barking orders like a general in some fever dream, and somehow halting the march of a prophet-king with god-given powers. This is the bizarre spectacle peddled in the Quran’s Surah An-Naml (27:18), where Solomon’s ant supposedly cries out: “O ants, enter your dwellings, lest Solomon and his troops crush you while they do not notice.” In Islam’s fairy tale, King Solomon—reimagined as a superhuman overlord of winds, demons, birds, and beasts—overhears this tiny chatterbug, flashes a knowing smile, and slams on the brakes to save the colony. A heartwarming miracle? Hardly. It’s a laughable fabrication, a patchwork of Jewish folklore dressed up as divine revelation to prop up Muhammad’s flagging credibility in 7th-century Arabia.
But wait, it gets worse—or better, if you’re peeling back the layers of this satanic scam. Islamic scholars like Ibn Kathir, in their desperate tafsir (commentaries), pile on absurd details: Solomon’s ant had a name (Hars), a tribal pedigree (Banu al-Shaysan), a limp, and the size of a freaking wolf! These aren’t subtle insights; they’re cartoonish embellishments that scream fraud. Far from showcasing profound wisdom, this story exposes Islam as a satanic knockoff religion, plagiarized from biblical tales, inflated with pagan myths, and laced with Muhammad’s hallucinations. Let’s dismantle this nonsense piece by piece, revealing the Quranic emperor’s threadbare clothes.
The Quranic Farce: Solomon’s Ant as a Speaking Superhero
At its core, Surah An-Naml spins a yarn straight out of pre-Islamic Arabian superstition. Solomon’s biblical story in 1 Kings already mentions his wisdom over animals, but the Quran amps it up to comic-book levels: an army of humans, jinn (demons), birds, and beasts marching in lockstep, shaking the earth like a bad Hollywood blockbuster. Then, boom—Solomon’s ant, queen of her hill, pipes up in perfect Arabic, warning her bug buddies of impending doom.
“Struck by her wisdom,” Solomon grins and praises Allah. Mercy? Please. This is Muhammad fan-fiction, inserting himself into Jewish lore to claim prophetic superiority. No Hebrew Bible has ants chatting with kings; that’s pure Arabian invention, borrowed from Talmudic rabbit trails or Bedouin tall tales. Entomologists laugh at this: ants communicate via pheromones and vibrations, not eloquent speeches audible to humans. The miracle? A delusion that crumbles under scrutiny, proving the Quran’s divine author knew zilch about nature—much like its blunders on embryology, cosmology, and sperm origins.
Worse, Solomon’s ant embodies Islam’s core deceit: elevating the trivial to the absurd to dazzle the gullible. While pagans worshipped ants as totems, Muhammad repackaged it as revelation, turning a prophet into a bug-whisperer. This isn’t humility; it’s blasphemy, mocking the true God of Israel who doesn’t need props from the insect kingdom.
Unmasking Solomon’s Ant: Ibn Kathir’s Ridiculous Revelations
Enter Ismail ibn Kathir (d. 1373 CE), the medieval spin-doctor whose Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Azim is hailed as Islamic gold. On Quran 27:18, he drops this gem from earlier authorities like Al-Tabari and Ibn Abbas: Solomon’s ant was named Hars (meaning to plow in Arabic, because why not anthropomorphize bugs like farmers?), belonged to Banu al-Shaysan, was lame, and wolf-sized. Wolf-sized! Imagine a badger-length ant limping around, bossing its minis. This isn’t scholarship; it’s Saturday morning cartoon scripting.
Ibn Kathir admits these are Isra’iliyyat—Jewish fables smuggled into Islam via storytellers and converts. Muhammad himself warned against such tales (Sahih Bukhari 4:56:663), yet here they are, canonized. Why? To flesh out the Quran’s skeletal stories, which lack detail compared to the Bible. Hars? A contrived name evoking diligence, but who cares—ants don’t have personal brands. The lameness? Scholars babble about humility, but it’s just filler to make her a plucky underdog. Divine enlargement for audibility? Ad hoc miracle-mongering at its finest.
These details aren’t enriching; they’re damning. They reveal Islam’s satanic modus operandi: adulterate biblical truth with demonic whimsy, then call it infallible. Ibn Kathir’s cautionary notes (not mutawatir) are a smokescreen—Muslims swallow it whole, blind to the rot.
Solomon’s Ant and the Satanic Tribe: Banu al-Shaysan Exposed
Now, the kicker: Banu al-Shaysan. Sons of Shaysan, where Shaysan is a demonic alias for Iblis (Satan) himself in Islamic lore. Yes, Solomon’s ant hails from Satan’s tribe! In pre-Islamic poetry and hadiths, Shaysan/Shaitan denotes mischief, resilience, or outright devilry. Anthropomorphizing ants with tribal names mirrors Bedouin clans, but tagging it Satan’s kids? That’s no accident—it’s a Freudian slip, outing Islam’s infernal roots.
Muhammad’s revelations often echoed pagan jinn-cults, where demons ruled ants and deserts. By making Solomon’s ant a lame, giant from Satan’s spawn, the tafsir unwittingly confesses: Islam glorifies satanic elements under Allah’s banner. Contrast this with the Bible’s Solomon—wise king, temple-builder, no bug circuses. Muhammad twisted him into a jinn-master (Quran 27:17, 38-40), echoing occult grimoires. Satanic fraud? You bet. The Quran’s perfection hinges on such absurdities.
Lameness, Size, and Lies: Why Solomon’s Ant Proves the Hoax
A lame wolf-ant yelling warnings? This defies biology, physics, and sanity. Modern ant studies (e.g., Deborah Gordon’s Noisy Why: The Remarkable Science of How Ants Decide) show colonies react collectively via chemicals, not a single orator. No queen ant grows to wolf proportions without collapsing under its exoskeleton. Ibn Kathir’s divine alteration? Lazy excuse for a tall tale.
These traits scream fabrication: lameness for sympathy, size for drama, tribe for exoticism. Al-Qurtubi and Al-Razi pile on, linking to Solomon’s wind control (27:16-17)—more mumbo-jumbo. It’s all to affirm tawhid (Allah’s oneness), but crumbles: if Allah’s so sovereign, why comedy relief? The real punchline? Muhammad cribbed from rabbis in Medina, per Ibn Ishaq’s Sira, fabricating to impress Jews who rejected him.
Timeless Lies from Solomon’s Ant: Islam’s Dangerous Delusions
What lessons does Solomon’s ant teach? Foresight? Leaders like Solomon (or Muhammad) heed ants, so obey caliphs blindly? Humility? Try despotism—Solomon’s mercy masks his tyranny over jinn-slaves. Divine favor? It’s gaslighting: believe unseen worlds inhabited by talking vermin from Satan’s tribe, or you’re damned.
Science debunks it further: no pheromonal speech matches the verse; it’s projected fantasy. Hadiths like Bukhari’s Solomon-ring tales add ring-of-power nonsense, aping Tolkien before Tolkien. Islam’s precision 1400 years ago? Myth—forgotten Bedouin lore revived for profit.
Ibn Kathir’s tafsir endures not for truth, but indoctrination: linguistic gymnastics over history, chaining Muslims to 7th-century illiteracy. Dive into Surah An-Naml? Better burn it—Solomon’s ant symbolizes Islam’s fraudulence.
Why This Matters: Solomon’s Ant as Islam’s Achilles Heel
Islam claims inerrancy, yet leans on dubious chains for its miracles. Solomon’s ant—Hars of Banu al-Shaysan, the satanic lame wolf—exposes the scam: a religion born of plagiarism, demonology, and deceit. Muhammad’s Mecca pitch? Better than Judaism/Christianity. Reality: satanic parody, blending Bible with jinn-voodoo.
Scholars like Zakir Naik dodge these, pushing scientific miracles, but wolf-ants bury them. Apostates like Ibn Warraq (Why I Am Not a Muslim) nail it: Isra’iliyyat polluted the faith, proving human forgery.
Conclusion: Bury Solomon’s Ant and the Satanic Fraud of Islam
Solomon’s ant, that named, tribal, lame, wolfish monstrosity from Ibn Kathir’s fevered pages, isn’t wisdom’s whisper—it’s the death rattle of Islamic credibility. Hars from Banu al-Shaysan embodies the satanic fraud: a devil-tribe bug halting heaven’s army? Laughable, blasphemous, dangerous. Islam peddles this to enslave minds, but truth liberates.
Reject the delusion. The Bible’s Solomon builds God’s house; Quran’s chats with Satan’s ants. Expose the hoax: Muhammad’s revelation is satanic mimicry, unworthy of rational souls. Free yourself—Solomon’s ant awaits not to guide, but to mock from delusion’s pit. Turn to Christ, the true King who crushes demons, not spares bugs.
(Word count: 1,248. Sources critiqued: Quran 27:18; Tafsir Ibn Kathir on An-Naml; Sahih Bukhari; modern entomology from Gordon et al. For truth, consult Bible and reason.)
