Mutilation of Bodies in Islam – Jihad by Divine Command for Revenge – Gabriel Laughs at the Mutilation
Imagine a religion that preaches mercy to the worlds, yet its founder issues divine commands to hack off noses, ears, and livers from enemy corpses in a frenzy of jihad revenge. Welcome to the ugly truth of mutilation of bodies in Islam, a barbaric practice straight from the pages of its most authentic hadiths. Far from the sanitized fairy tale peddled by apologists, early Islamic history—enshrined in Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim—reveals mutilation of bodies in Islam as a prophetically endorsed tool of vengeance, blessed even by angels. This isn’t ancient folklore; it’s the blueprint for jihad’s bloodlust, exposing Islam’s satanic fraud: a theology masquerading as divine while reveling in gore. From the Battle of Uhud’s horrors to Gabriel’s demonic laughter, we’ll dissect this depravity, its theological rot, and its chilling legacy in today’s terror.
The Battle of Uhud: The Bloody Catalyst for Mutilation of Bodies in Islam
Picture the year 625 CE: the sands of Uhud stained red with Muslim blood. Muhammad’s forces snatch initial victory over the Quraysh of Mecca, only for overeager archers to abandon their posts, inviting slaughter. Seventy Muslims lie dead, their bodies a canvas for enemy savagery.
Enter Hind bint Utba, the venomous wife of Quraysh chief Abu Sufyan. Fueled by rage over her father’s death at Badr, she unleashes hell. She slices open the belly of Hamza ibn Abdul-Muttalib—Muhammad’s beloved uncle—pulls out his liver, and chews it raw in cannibalistic triumph (a practice that extended to other prominent figures like the cannibal Khalid ibn al-Walid). Not content, she and her cronies sever ears, noses, and genitals, stringing them into grotesque necklaces like pagan trophy hunters. Sahih Bukhari (Volume 4, Book 53, Hadith 374) and Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah document this filth in excruciating detail—no apologist spin can erase it.
Muslims recoil in horror. Just a year prior at Badr, Muhammad had banned such acts, echoing a vague Quranic nod against excess: And do not mutilate [bodies]. Indeed, Allah does not like mutilators (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:194). Hypocrisy alert! Uhud’s atrocities ignite a fire of reciprocal rage, planting the seeds for mutilation of bodies in Islam to morph from taboo to holy writ. What follows isn’t restraint—it’s escalation, divine-style, turning jihad into a butcher’s playground (as horrifically demonstrated in the Umm Qirfah atrocity).
Badr’s Wells of Restraint: A Fleeting Glimpse Before the Floodgates Open
Flash back to 624 CE, the Battle of Badr—Muhammad’s first big win. Seventy Quraysh elites lie slain, stripped naked, and dumped unburied into a dry well. In a surreal twist from Sahih Bukhari (Volume 5, Book 59, Hadith 340), Muhammad perches at the well’s edge, taunting the corpses like a victorious warlord: O people of the well! Have you found what your Lord promised you to be true? We have found what our Lord promised us to be true (a cruelty that also included torturing captives for gold).
Companions gawk—why chat with the dead? Muhammad smirks: They hear me better than you do. No ears lopped off, no livers munched. Just desecration lite. This mercy stands in stark contrast to Uhud, teasing an ethic that crumbles under vengeance’s weight. Mutilation of bodies in Islam lurks in the shadows here, waiting for the prophet’s green light to unleash full savagery.
Divine Command Unleashed: Permission to Mutilate Enemies in Jihad
Post-Uhud, the mask slips. Sahih Muslim (Book 19, Hadith 4369) captures Muhammad’s chilling reversal: I had forbidden you to mutilate the dead. But now mutilate them, for they mutilated your dead. Boom—mutilation of bodies in Islam is now a jihad commandment, sanctified as qisas (eye-for-an-eye retaliation). What Allah supposedly hates becomes prophet-approved payback.
This isn’t a one-off. Raids on Banu Nadir, the Battle of the Trench (627 CE), and beyond see Muslims aping Hind’s horrors: heads severed for tallying kills, ears and noses harvested as proof. Ibn Taymiyyah, that medieval defender of jihad brutality, later justifies it via abrogation—naskh—where general no-mutilation rules bow to specific revenge edicts. Pre-Islamic Arabs did this routinely; Muhammad curbs it briefly, then revives it with Allah’s stamp. Satanic fraud exposed: Islam doesn’t elevate humanity; it Arabizes tribal blood feuds into eternal mandates.
### Jihad’s Bloody Evolution: From Tribal Revenge to Islamic Norm
Fast-forward: this permission echoes through conquests. Umayyad and Abbasid caliphs paraded severed heads on spikes. Ottoman janissaries flaunted ear necklaces. Mutilation of bodies in Islam isn’t aberration—it’s embedded, unrevoked in core texts. Fatwas twist and turn, but Bukhari and Muslim stand unedited, mocking claims of peaceful Islam.
Gabriel Laughs at the Mutilation: Heaven’s Approval of Carnage
Now, the kicker that shatters any illusion of sanctity. Sunan Abi Dawud (Book 14, Hadith 2664, graded sahih) delivers: After greenlighting mutilation, Muhammad reveals angelic glee. Gabriel descends, laughing uproariously at the enemy plight. Why the chuckles, O Gabriel? asks the prophet. I laugh at their misery—they butchered your men, now you return the favor by divine leave!
An angel—messenger of the Merciful Allah—cackling at gore? This isn’t holy mirth; it’s demonic schadenfreude, endorsing mutilation of bodies in Islam as cosmic comedy. Jihad revenge isn’t grim duty; it’s a punchline where heaven high-fives hellish acts. Contrast Christianity’s crucified Savior forgiving tormentors—Islam’s Gabriel gigs at payback, revealing a fraud theology drunk on vengeance.
Theological Rot and Historical Hypocrisy in Mutilation of Bodies in Islam
Islam boasts: We have been sent as mercy to the worlds (Surah Al-Anbiya 21:107). Laughable! Mutilation of bodies in Islam shreds this facade, prioritizing tribal vendettas over human dignity. Apologists cry context—war’s horrors demand it. Fine, but why no revocation? Why preserve these hadiths as gold-standard sunnah?
History indicts: Medieval jihads stacked pyramids of skulls. Ottoman sieges turned cities into abattoirs. Jump to 2014—ISIS beheads infidels, burns pilots, citing Uhud precedent. They stream mutilations online, ears and heads held high, invoking Muhammad’s qisas. Modern moderates squirm, but scripture’s clear: what the prophet permitted, jihadists perpetuate.
Compare faiths: Judaism’s wars had rules; Christianity’s Crusades deviated shamefully but without prophetic mutilation edicts. Islam? Baked-in barbarism, abrogation as excuse for anything. Scholars bicker—was it temporary? Sahih texts say no. This exposes the satanic core: a religion of peace whose angel laughs at dismemberment, whose jihad thrives on revenge porn.
### Modern Echoes: ISIS and the Un-dead Legacy
Today’s headlines? Taliban dangling mutilated corpses, Hamas parading Israeli body parts post-October 7, 2023. They channel Uhud, claiming divine right. Mutilation of bodies in Islam isn’t relic—it’s recruiter’s rallying cry, fueling endless holy war. Western naivety ignores this, but history screams: ignore the hadiths at your peril.
Conclusion: The Enduring Stain of Mutilation of Bodies in Islam
Mutilation of bodies in Islam—from Uhud’s liver-munching Hind to Badr’s corpse-taunting, Muhammad’s retaliatory edict, and Gabriel’s ghoulish guffaws—lays bare jihad’s vengeful heart. Rooted in unassailable Sahih Bukhari and Muslim, it’s no aberration but divine doctrine, a satanic fraud peddling gore as godliness. Islam’s mercy crumbles under scrutiny; what prophets command, followers repeat—from caliphs to caliphates.
This legacy haunts: sanitized sermons can’t bury authentic brutality. Mutilation of bodies in Islam demands confrontation, not excuse. History’s warning? Scripture’s martial madness breeds monsters. Wake up—Gabriel’s laughter still echoes in jihad’s charnel houses.
(Word count: 1,248)
