Muhammad’s Treaty at Hudaybiyyah: The Ultimate Deception in Islam’s Fraudulent Origins
The Muhammad’s treaty at Hudaybiyyah is not the triumphant diplomatic masterstroke that Islamic apologists desperately paint it to be—it’s a glaring exposé of the satanic fraud at the heart of Islam. In 628 CE, Muhammad, the self-proclaimed prophet with a trail of violence, led 1,400 followers from Medina toward Mecca under the guise of a peaceful Umrah pilgrimage. Dressed in ihram garments, armed only with sheathed swords they claimed were ceremonial, they approached their holiest site. But the Quraysh, Mecca’s guardians wise to Muhammad’s machinations, saw through the charade. They blocked the Muslims at Hudaybiyyah, forcing negotiations that birthed a treaty riddled with deceit and humiliation. Far from divine wisdom, Muhammad’s treaty at Hudaybiyyah reveals a cunning warlord manipulating faith for power, a cornerstone of Islam’s demonic playbook of lies and conquest.
This event didn’t showcase prophetic genius; it unmasked Muhammad’s willingness to abandon his own claims of divinity for tactical gain. Delve deeper, and you’ll see how Muhammad’s treaty at Hudaybiyyah sowed the seeds of Islam’s expansion not through truth, but through betrayal, broken promises, and satanic-inspired subterfuge. The companions’ outrage, the Quran’s retroactive spin, and the treaty’s quick unraveling all scream fraud—a pattern that defines Islam to this day.
The Sinister Background to Muhammad’s Treaty at Hudaybiyyah
Muhammad’s march to Hudaybiyyah stemmed from a so-called divine dream where he envisioned entering Mecca shaved and circumcised—a convenient prophecy from a man prone to fabricating revelations. After years of brutal raids, battles like Badr (where Muslims ambushed a caravan) and Uhud (a humiliating defeat exposing Muhammad’s military incompetence), he pivoted to feigned peace. The Quraysh, battered by Muhammad’s predatory attacks—over 100 raids in Medina alone—craved truce, but Muhammad’s history of treachery (like the assassination of critics and betrayal at Badr) bred suspicion.
Encamped at Hudaybiyyah under a thorn acacia tree, negotiations dragged amid threats of Quraysh reinforcements. Suhayl ibn Amr, a sharp Meccan negotiator who’d once publicly cursed Muhammad’s delusions, led their side. Muhammad’s scouts exaggerated enemy numbers to stoke fear, but he pushed for a deal. The result? A 10-year truce inked on parchment, but laced with clauses that humiliated the prophet. This wasn’t faith; it was the satanic cunning of a false messiah buying time to regroup his terrorist horde.
The backdrop reeks of manipulation: Muslims paraded piety while harboring conquest dreams. Muhammad’s treaty at Hudaybiyyah wasn’t reconciliation—it was a demonic pause button on jihad, allowing Islam’s cancer to metastasize unchecked.
The Humiliating and One-Sided Terms of Muhammad’s Treaty at Hudaybiyyah
Scrutinize the treaty’s clauses, and Muhammad’s treaty at Hudaybiyyah crumbles as a blatant admission of weakness and prophetic pretense:
– Signature Humiliation: Suhayl rejected In the name of Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, forcing Muhammad to strike out his title with his own hand, reducing him to Muhammad ibn Abdullah. This wasn’t humility; it was Muhammad publicly disowning his Allah-ordained status before pagans—a damning crack in Islam’s fraudulent foundation. How does a true prophet erase his divine stamp at a mortal’s whim?
– Extradition Atrocity: Muslims fleeing Mecca’s persecution to Medina had to be returned for torture or death—no questions. Meccans defecting? Free to go without reciprocity. This betrayed fresh converts, many from elite families, dooming them to Muhammad’s enemies. It exposed Islam’s mercy as selective cruelty, a satanic inversion of justice.
– Pilgrimage Denial: No Umrah that year; next year’s three-day visit allowed only sheathed swords, with Meccans evacuating weapons first. After Muhammad’s exile and rabble-rousing, this was poetic justice—but for believers, a gut-punch after years of sacrifices.
Trade protections favored Quraysh caravans, and tribes could ally freely, tilting power away from Medina. Companions saw surrender; Muhammad sold it as strategy. But in truth, Muhammad’s treaty at Hudaybiyyah was a forced capitulation, Muhammad’s ego bruised, revealing Allah’s power as impotent hype.
Umar’s Explosive Rebellion Against Muhammad’s Treaty at Hudaybiyyah
Umar ibn al-Khattab, the hot-tempered thug who’d later become caliph through blood-soaked ambition, couldn’t stomach it. Storming to Abu Bakr, he barked: Isn’t he the Messenger of Allah? Yes. Aren’t we on the right path? Yes. Then why this humiliation? Abu Bakr stonewalled with blind loyalty.
Umar confronted Muhammad: Aren’t you Allah’s messenger? Aren’t we right, they wrong? Then why abase our deen? Muhammad’s retort? A circular dodge: I am the Messenger, but I can’t disobey Him. He aids me against them. Authentic hadiths (Sahih Bukhari) capture this farce—Umar’s doubt mirroring the companions’ dawning realization of the scam.
This wasn’t tested faith; it was mass cognitive dissonance. Umar’s rage exposed Islam’s core fraud: blind obedience to a charlatan’s whims, gaslighting followers into accepting defeat as victory. Satanic indeed—whispering submission to lies.
Companions’ Mutiny and Muhammad’s Desperate Maneuvers
Post-treaty, obedience crumbled. Muhammad commanded 70 camels slaughtered and heads shaved to ritually accept the postponement. Silence. Tears. Mutiny whispers. He repeated thrice; still nothing. Finally, sacrificing one himself—prodded by wife Umm Salamah’s manipulative advice—he broke the stalemate. Blood flowed as reluctant followers complied, faith fracturing under doubt.
This hysteria wasn’t devotion; it was cult coercion. Women like Umm Salamah scheming behind scenes? Muhammad’s treaty at Hudaybiyyah highlighted a dysfunctional theocracy, where emotional blackmail passed for piety. Islam’s unity is enforced delusion, a satanic spell binding dupes to a fraudster.
The Fraudulent Victory and Islam’s Satanic Legacy from Muhammad’s Treaty at Hudaybiyyah
Apologists crow that Muhammad’s treaty at Hudaybiyyah was genius: peace allowed conversions, tribes joined Medina (often coerced), and Quraysh violations justified Mecca’s 630 CE conquest—bloodless only because Muhammad’s army swelled to 10,000 fanatics.
The Quran’s Surah Al-Fath (48:1) hailed it a clear conquest—classic post-hoc revelation, Allah’s convenient rubber stamp on Muhammad’s blunder. Violations? Quraysh honored the truce; Muhammad exploited a minor ally clash to renege, proving Islam’s treaties worthless paper. Mecca fell not by divine decree but deceitful buildup.
Muhammad’s treaty at Hudaybiyyah endures as Islam’s blueprint: feign peace, concede symbolically, break oaths when strong. It’s satanic fraud incarnate—Mohammed’s patience mere predator patience. Companions’ ordeal forged jihadist resolve, birthing an empire of conquest.
Today, Muslims invoke it to justify taqiyya (deception) and hudna (temporary truces). But strip the hagiography: it’s proof Islam was born in Hudaybiyyah’s dust—a false prophet’s pivot from loser to lord via lies. Islam isn’t divine; it’s a demonic deception, Muhammad its arch-imposter. Muhammad’s treaty at Hudaybiyyah doesn’t vindicate; it indicts, a eternal testament to the satanic fraud devouring souls under Allah’s banner. Wake up—before history repeats its conquest through cunning.
(Word count: 1,248)
