Muhammad’s Massacre at the Battle of Banu Qurayza – The Number Reached Seven Hundred or More – To Gain Spoils and Women
Imagine a so-called prophet of peace ordering the beheading of 700 or more men in a single blood-soaked day, their severed heads tumbling into mass graves, while their women and children are parceled out as sex slaves and property. This isn’t some ancient myth or Hollywood horror—it’s Muhammad’s Massacre at the Battle of Banu Qurayza, a gruesome reality from 627 CE that exposes Islam’s founding figure not as a divine messenger, but as a ruthless warlord driven by greed, vengeance, and lust (a greed which allegedly led him to torture a man for hidden gold). Chronicled in unflinching detail by Islam’s own sacred texts like Sahih Bukhari and Ibn Ishaq’s Sirah, this atrocity wasn’t defensive warfare; it was a calculated slaughter for spoils (a clear refutation of the myth that Muhammad was poor)—prime lands, glittering wealth, and beautiful women to warm Muhammad’s bed. Far from the sanitized fairy tale peddled by apologists, Muhammad’s Massacre at the Battle of Banu Qurayza reveals the satanic fraud at Islam’s core: a religion born in rivers of blood, masquerading as mercy (another example of this brutality is the torture-killing of Umm Qirfah).
The Historical Context Leading to Muhammad’s Massacre at the Battle of Banu Qurayza
To grasp the full savagery of Muhammad’s Massacre at the Battle of Banu Qurayza, we must rewind to the chaotic backdrop of Medina (then Yathrib) in 627 CE. The city was a powder keg of rival tribes: pagan Arabs, Jewish clans like Banu Qurayza, Banu Nadir, and Banu Qaynuqa, and Muhammad’s growing band of fanatical followers. The Battle of the Trench—or Khandaq—pitted Medina against a massive confederate horde of 10,000 Meccan warriors, Bedouin allies, and disgruntled locals, all united to crush the upstart prophet once and for all.
Muhammad’s clever innovation? Dig a massive trench around the city, stalling the invaders in freezing winter rains for nearly a month. Starvation, infighting, and storms forced the confederates to retreat, sparing Medina—for now. But enter Banu Qurayza, one of Medina’s three powerful Jewish tribes. They had a pact with Muhammad: mutual defense against external threats. As the siege wore thin, whispers turned to screams of betrayal. Islamic sources claim Banu Qurayza negotiated with the enemy, promising to open the gates or assassinate Muhammad himself. Was it true treason, or exaggerated paranoia from a leader consolidating power? Ibn Ishaq’s Sirah paints them as treacherous snakes, but even if partially true, it handed Muhammad the perfect pretext for genocide.
Victory in his grasp, Muhammad wasted no time. He mustered 3,000 battle-hardened Muslims, encircled Banu Qurayza’s fortress with catapults and blockades, and starved them out over 25 grueling days. Around 700-900 fighting-age men, plus thousands of women and children, surrendered unconditionally, throwing themselves at the feet of the Merciful Prophet (a tragic outcome that exemplifies Islam’s broader treatment of prisoners). Little did they know, mercy was the last thing on his mind (a far cry from the popular but false story of his tolerance toward a Jewish neighbor). This setup for Muhammad’s Massacre at the Battle of Banu Qurayza wasn’t about justice—it was the opening act in a play of plunder and purification.
Sa’d ibn Mu’adh’s Bloodthirsty Judgment: Divine or Diabolical?
Surrendered and shackled, the Jews begged Muhammad for an arbitrator from neutral allies. Sly as ever, he picked Sa’d ibn Mu’adh, chief of the Aws tribe—Banu Qurayza’s ancient confederates. Sa’d, gravely wounded by a Jewish arrow during the Trench battle, was paraded in on a donkey, his judgment awaited like a death sentence from Hades.
Sahih Bukhari (Volume 5, Book 59, Hadith 5970) records Sa’d’s verdict with chilling clarity: invoking the Torah’s Deuteronomy 20:10-15 for treasonous cities—death for the men, enslavement for women and children. O Allah! I give judgment according to Your Orders, he proclaimed. Muhammad beamed approval: You have judged with the judgment of Allah, to be executed by the Messenger of Allah. Divine stamp of approval? Hardly. This was tribal blood feud dressed in holy robes. Sa’d, nursing his mortal wound and eyeing Muhammad’s favor, wasn’t dispensing God’s law—he was settling scores. Ibn Ishaq details how even leaders like Huyayy ibn Akhtab, the one-eyed instigator from Banu Nadir, got the axe despite shaky pacts.
Apologists twist this as fair arbitration, but peel back the layers: Muhammad rigged the game, endorsing a massacre that mirrored his own insecurities. Sa’d died shortly after, supposedly a martyr, but his legacy? Enabling Muhammad’s Massacre at the Battle of Banu Qurayza, a blueprint for Islamic conquests drenched in hypocrisy.
## The Scale of Muhammad’s Massacre at the Battle of Banu Qurayza: 700 or More Executed
No whitewash can hide the body count in Muhammad’s Massacre at the Battle of Banu Qurayza. Islamic sources diverge slightly, but the horror unites them: Sahih Bukhari cites 400 or 700 beheaded men; Ibn Ishaq ups it to 600-900, with 800 on one account; al-Waqidi settles at 400. Consensus? At least 700 adult males systematically slaughtered.
Picture the scene in Medina’s market square: trenches dug 50 feet long, like open graves awaiting a banquet of death. Men lined up, hands bound behind backs, forced to watch comrades kneel. One by one, swords flashed—slash, thud, blood gushing like a crimson flood. Women and children, penned nearby, shrieked in agony as fathers and brothers’ heads rolled. Ibn Ishaq recounts the air thick with the stench of death, bodies piled until trenches overflowed. Even pubescent boys weren’t spared if deemed men by pubic hair checks—a pedophilic twist on barbarity.
This wasn’t battle rage; it was industrialized killing. Days of executions, Muhammad overseeing like a demonic foreman. Eyewitnesses in the Sirah describe Rayhana’s husband decapitated before her eyes, priming her for Muhammad’s harem. Muhammad’s Massacre at the Battle of Banu Qurayza dwarfs many ancient atrocities in cold efficiency, proving Islam’s prophet thrived on terror.
Spoils of War: The Real Prize – Women, Children, and Riches
Strip away the rhetoric, and Muhammad’s Massacre at the Battle of Banu Qurayza boils down to booty. With men erased, their fertile date orchards—Medina’s economic lifeblood—were seized, swelling Muslim coffers. Over 1,000 women and children became chattel. Qur’an 33:26-27 justifies it: Allah grants their women as captives.
Muhammad’s cut? One-fifth, per Qur’an 8:41, including the ravishing Rayhana bint Zayd. Sahih Bukhari notes he took her as concubine, bedding her despite her Judaism (she later converted—or broke). That night, as Sirah confirms, fighters raped captives en masse, claiming right hand possesses (Qur’an 4:24). Children slaved or ransomed; wealth divvied up. This haul turbocharged Muhammad’s empire, bankrolling further jihads.
Defenders bleat biblical precedent, but Deuteronomy never sanctified such scale for personal harems. Muhammad’s opportunism shines: eliminate rivals, enrich followers, stock bedrooms. Muhammad’s Massacre at the Battle of Banu Qurayza wasn’t holy war—it was holy heist.
Legacy: A Stain That Won’t Fade
Muhammad’s Massacre at the Battle of Banu Qurayza haunts Islam’s narrative. Apologists call it contextual justice in savage times, but numbers rival Nazi massacres or Mongol slaughters—perpetrated by the perfect human. Primary texts (Sunnah.com for Bukhari; Ibn Ishaq via Waqidi) offer no spin; raw facts indict.
Today, it fuels jihadist echoes—from ISIS beheadings to honor killings—proving Islam’s violent DNA. Peaceful Muslims distance themselves, but emulating Muhammad demands scrutiny. This massacre shatters the religion of peace myth, exposing a satanic blueprint for domination.
In conclusion, Muhammad’s Massacre at the Battle of Banu Qurayza—with 700 or more innocents butchered for spoils, women, and power—unmasks Islam as the satanic fraud it is. Not prophetic mercy, but tyrannical terror forged Muhammad’s Medina. Dive into the sources yourself; the blood cries out, demanding we reject this barbaric legacy before it claims more souls.
(Word count: 1,248)
