Muhammad the Son of the Marketplace Says to Umaymah bint al-Nu’man: Give Yourself to Me
In the twisted annals of Islamic lore, one narration stands out as a grotesque emblem of Muhammad’s predatory impulses: when Muhammad the son of the marketplace says to Umaymah bint al-Nu’man: Give yourself to me. Far from any noble tale of consent or humility, this Sahih Bukhari story—straight from the most authentic hadith collection—exposes the so-called Prophet as a lecherous merchant emboldened by his self-proclaimed divine status. What apologists spin as profound insights is nothing less than a window into the satanic fraud of Islam: a cult leader using tribal politics and Allah’s name to harass women, reject boundaries, and cloak his lust in piety. This incident isn’t humble; it’s horrifying, revealing Muhammad’s marketplace haggling tactics applied to human flesh.
The Historic Context: A Predator on the Prowl Amid Tribal Prey
Picture this: 7th-century Arabia, a brutal wasteland of tribal feuds and opportunistic alliances. Muhammad, the self-styled messenger of God but still mocked as the son of the marketplace for his lowly trading past, drags his band of sycophants on yet another expedition. Sahih Bukhari (Book of Divorce, Hadith 5252) recounts it through Abu Usayd al-Sa’idi, one of his Ansar lapdogs. They trek to al-Shawt, a deceptive oasis between palm groves—a perfect spot for the Prophet’s divine errands, or so the hagiographers claim.
Muhammad orders his followers: Sit here, like a pimp dismissing his entourage, then slinks off alone to the house of Umaymah bint al-Nu’man ibn Sharahil, aka al-Jawniyyah from the proud Jawna tribe. She’s no lowly damsel; she’s tribal royalty, guarded by her nurse, a queen in Bedouin terms. Why does a prophet need to isolate himself for a chat? In pre-Islamic Arabia, marriages sealed pacts, but Muhammad’s approach reeks of conquest, not alliance. Dismissed by rivals as a mere trader—shepherd boy turned caravan hustler—he’s compensating for his humble origins by demanding elite women. Muhammad the son of the marketplace says to Umaymah bint al-Nu’man: Give yourself to me, and what follows is a masterclass in Islamic gaslighting.
This wasn’t romance; it was power play. Muhammad’s multiple wives—Aisha at nine, Zaynab snatched from his adopted son—set the pattern. Umaymah’s story fits the fraud: a man invoking Allah to override consent, turning tribal prejudice into his excuse for entitlement.
Muhammad the Son of the Marketplace Says to Umaymah bint al-Nu’man: Give Yourself to Me – The Creepy Confrontation
Barging into her home with feigned gentleness, Muhammad drops his line: Give yourself to me (habbi nafsaki ilayya in Arabic). Apologists call this customary, but translate it plainly: Hand over your body. No mahr discussed, no family involved—just a direct demand from the merciful prophet. Umaymah, sharp as a desert blade, fires back: Does a queen give herself to a commoner? She nails his status: son of the marketplace, not kingly stock.
Undeterred, the prophet reaches out—calming gesture or creepy advance? She recoils, screaming the ultimate shutdown: I seek refuge in Allah from you! Boom— she invokes God against God’s messenger. What does Muhammad do? Retract with shame? No. He mutters, You have sought refuge in One who protects, then bails. No apology, no reflection—just a pivot to save face.
This exchange screams red flags. Modern consent standards shatter here: uninvited entry, physical advance, divine override attempt. Islamic scholars like al-Nawawi twist it into patience, but it’s predation excused by hadith. Why Bukhari’s Divorce section? Because it’s prelude to possession—demand, reject, discard. Muhammad the son of the marketplace says to Umaymah bint al-Nu’man: Give yourself to me, and her no exposes the cult’s core: women as property, Allah as accomplice.
Deconstructing the Fraud: Tribal Bias or Legitimate Revulsion?
Umaymah’s tribe—Bani Kilab affiliates—viewed Muhammad as the upstart trader, not divine. Her rejection wasn’t disbelief; it was disgust at a polygamous warlord with a child bride fetish. Yet Islam’s apologists blame tribal hierarchies, ignoring Muhammad’s pattern: 11+ wives, concubines like Maria the Copt, forced unions post-conquest (e.g., Safiyyah after kin massacre). This hadith, chained through Abu Nu’aym to Abu Usayd, is sahih—authentic poison proving the prophet’s satanic sleaze.
The Prophet’s Generous Response: Bribes and Spin Control
Back with his crew, Muhammad plays noble: O Abu Usayd, clothe her with two garments and return her to her family. Generosity? Hardly. It’s damage control—fine robes as hush money, ensuring silence on his flop. No mahr required in shighar (exchange marriages), but he skips real dowry, tossing cloth scraps. Akhlas elevated? Laughable. It’s a marketplace merchant bribing off rejection, preserving his infallible image.
Compare to Quran 33:50, granting Muhammad special marriage perks: O Prophet, We have made lawful to you your wives… and any believing woman who gives herself to the Prophet. Sound familiar? Umaymah didn’t; she fled to Allah from him. This hadith mocks that verse, showing even believers recoil. Lessons? For Islam: coercion veiled as consent. For critics: proof of fraud—a conman using God to grope status.
### Deeper Insights: Consent in Islam? A Satanic Joke
Today’s #MeToo era obliterates this tale. Muhammad ignores boundaries: enters alone, touches, dismisses refuge lightly. Contrast Jesus’ respect for women or Paul’s mutual submission—Islam’s model is molestation manual. Umaymah’s pride? Valid; she’s nobler than the slave-trading prophet (Sahih Muslim 3901 confirms his markets).
Scholars dodge: hilm (forbearance), ijab wa qubul (offer-acceptance). Bull—it’s nikah without consent basics. Avoids shighar technically, but ethically bankrupt. Women get agency? Tell that to Aisha, beaten per Bukhari 7:72:715.
Why This Hadith Endures: Fuel for Islam’s Exposure
Muslims cling to it for humanizing Muhammad, but it damns him: accessible? As a stalker. Blueprint for men? Creep tactics. Generations swallow the lie, but scrutiny reveals satanism—Allahu Akbar while Allahu-fails to protect from his prophet.
Expand the scam: Post-rejection, Muhammad’s Khadijah wealth funded conquests; wives legitimized raids. Umaymah dodged bullets—literal, as widows became spoils (Quran 4:24). Chain robust? Forged in bias—companions polishing halos.
Critics like Ibn Warraq, Robert Spencer dissect this: Islam’s founder as 52-year-old marrying 9-year-old Aisha (Bukhari 5:58:234), poisoning kin (Ibn Hisham). Umaymah joins the chorus rejecting the fraud.
Broader Polemic: Islam’s War on Women
Zoom out: Quran 4:34 beats disobedient wives; 24:33 guardians control marriage. Hadiths galore—Muhammad ogling (Bukhari 6:60:274). Satanic inversion: God commands submission to a pervert. Christianity elevates Mary; Islam demotes to giveaway prizes.
Modern parallels: Honor killings, FGM in hadith lands, niqab cages—all trace to this marketplace mentality.
Conclusion: Exposing the Satanic Core
When Muhammad the son of the marketplace says to Umaymah bint al-Nu’man: Give yourself to me, Islam’s mask slips. No humility, no consent—just a fraud’s failed grab, bribed away and sanctified in Bukhari. This gem is garbage, proving Muhammad’s prophethood a satanic delusion: lust masquerading as law, tribes trading daughters to a tyrant. Reject this cult; honor Umaymah’s refuge. True faith frees; Islam enslaves. Let this hadith be its tombstone—expose the lie, dismantle the fraud, before more queens fall.
(Word count: 1,248)
