Exposing the Lustful Fraud: Muhammad, the “Best Man” Who Couldn’t Keep It in His Pants During Fasting

In an era where Google bizarrely crowns Muhammad as the “greatest man in history” upon searching for the best human ever—thanks to biased algorithms and Michael Hart’s controversial 1978 book “The 100,” which ranks this 7th-century warlord above Jesus, Newton, and Buddha—Muslims worldwide parrot the lie that he’s the pinnacle of morality. But peel back the veil of Islamic propaganda, and what do you find? A deviant hypocrite who couldn’t even uphold his own god’s fasting rules without succumbing to his insatiable lust (a pattern that even extended to his own aunt). This so-called prophet, hailed as flawless, disobeyed Allah (a pagan moon god repurposed for perverts, nothing like the biblical Yahweh) by groping and kissing his child bride Aisha during Ramadan fasts (one of his many wives), all while preaching piety and self-control (a stark contrast to what is known about the Prophet’s sexual prowess). If this is the “best man” ever, humanity’s standards are in the gutter. This polemic blasts open a sahih hadith from Musnad Ahmad, revealing Muhammad not as a saint, but a horny fraud whose actions mock the very faith he founded. Time to shatter the myth—Google’s darling is history’s biggest con artist.

The Hadith That Unmasks Muhammad’s Deviant Hypocrisy

Straight from Islamic sources, here’s the full hadith and its scholarly authentication, translated into English for all to see the depravity:

Musnad Ahmad | Musnad of the Women, Musnad of the Truthful Aisha bint al-Siddiq, may Allah be pleased with her (Hadith No: 25613)

25613- From Aisha, that the Messenger of Allah, peace be upon him, used to “kiss while he was fasting.”

(1) 25614- From Aisha that the Prophet, peace be upon him, similar to this, meaning in rubbing the semen (2)

Narrated by Ahmad in his Musnad.

(1) Authentic hadith, and this chain has trustworthy narrators, men of the two Sheikhs, but there is disagreement in it on Yahya—and he is Ibn Abi Kathir—the narrator from Abu Salamah, as will come.

Yahya= Sheikh of Ahmad: He is Ibn Sa’id al-Qattan, and Abu Salamah: He is Ibn Abd al-Rahman ibn Awf.

And it was narrated by al-Nasa’i in “al-Kubra” (3063) from the way of Yahya al-Qattan, with this chain.

And it was narrated by Ibn Rahwayh (843), and al-Tirmidhi in “al-‘Ilal al-Kabir” 1/345, and al-Nasa’i in “al-Kubra” (3064), and Ibn Abd al-Barr in “al-Tamhid” 22/139 from ways from Hisham al-Dastawa’i, with it.

And it was narrated by al-Nasa’i in “al-Kubra” (3065), and al-Tahawi in “Sharh Ma’ani al-Athar” 2/91 from the way of Ali ibn al-Mubarak, from Yahya ibn Abi Kathir, with it.

And there is disagreement in it on Yahya ibn Abi Kathir: For Hisham and Ali ibn al-Mubarak opposed Shayban al-Nahwi, as in the coming narration with number (26392), and Mu’awiyah ibn Salam, as will come in its authentication, and Sulayman ibn Arqam, as mentioned by al-Daraqutni in “al-‘Ilal” 5/folio 148, they narrated it from Yahya ibn Abi Kathir, from Abu Salamah, from Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz, from Urwah, from Aisha.

They added Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz.

And it was narrated from Yahya by al-Awza’i, and there is disagreement on him in it: For it was narrated by Yahya ibn Abd Allah al-Babilti, as in “Tarikh Baghdad” 7/426, and Mubashshir ibn Isma’il and Aqil, as mentioned by al-Daraqutni in “al-‘Ilal”, from al-Awza’i, from Yahya ibn Abi Kathir, from Abu Salamah, from Aisha.

They did not mention Urwah.

And it was narrated from him by al-Walid ibn Muslim, and there is disagreement on him in it: For it was narrated by Mahmud ibn Khalid al-Dimashqi as narrated by al-Nasa’i in “al-Kubra” (3061), and Muhammad ibn Abd Allah ibn Maymun, as narrated by al-Tahawi in “Sharh Ma’ani al-Athar” 2/91, from al-Walid, from al-Awza’i, from Yahya, from Abu Salamah, from Aisha, and likewise narrated from al-Awza’i by Mubashshir ibn Isma’il, and Aqil, as mentioned by al-Daraqutni in “al-‘Ilal”, meaning they did not mention Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz nor Urwah in the chain.

And it was narrated by Yazid ibn Abd Allah ibn Raziq, as narrated by Tammam in “Fawa’id” (562), and Abu Bakr al-Baghandi in “Musnad Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz” (56), from al-Walid, from al-Awza’i, from Yahya following Shayban al-Nahwi and those who followed him.

Meaning mentioning Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz and Urwah in the chain.

And he was followed by Yazid ibn Sinan Abu Farwah al-Tamimi, from al-Awza’i as mentioned by al-Daraqutni.

Al-Bukhari said as quoted by al-Tirmidhi in “al-‘Ilal al-Kabir” 1/345-346: And as if the hadith of Shayban is better in my opinion.

And al-Daraqutni said in “al-‘Ilal” 5/folio 148: The saying is the saying of Shayban and those who followed him who mentioned Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz in it.

We say: Meaning and Urwah also, but Ibn Hibban said after the hadith (3545): This news was heard by Abu Salamah ibn Abd al-Rahman, from Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz, from Urwah, from Aisha, and he heard it from Aisha herself, and the evidence for its authenticity is that Ma’mar said: From al-Zuhri, from Abu Salamah, he said: I said to Aisha: In the obligatory and voluntary? So once he transmitted the news from Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz, from Urwah, from Aisha, and another he transmitted the news from her herself.

We say: And according to Ibn Hibban, then Abu Salamah a third time transmitted the news from Urwah, from Aisha, as in this narration of Ahmad.

And al-Nasa’i mentioned in “al-Kubra” the disagreement in it on Hisham al-Dastawa’i: So he narrated it in it (3062) from the way of Ishaq ibn Yusuf, from Hisham, from Yahya ibn Abi Kathir, from Abu Salamah, from Aisha, he did not mention Urwah in it, like the narration of Aqil and those who followed him, as previously.

But Imam Ahmad narrated it as in the narration (26045) from Ishaq, from Hisham al-Dastawa’i, mentioning Urwah in the chain, so perhaps there is disagreement in it on Ishaq al-Azraq also.

= Al-Daraqutni said: And Yahya ibn Abi Kathir narrated it with another chain, and there is disagreement on him in it also: For al-Awza’i narrated it, from Yahya, from Abu Salamah, from Umm Salamah.

Then he said: And that is written in Musnad Umm Salamah if Allah wills.

We say: And it will come from the way of Abu Salamah, from Aisha with numbers: (25867) and (25868) and (25953) and (25966).

And it was previously with number (24110).

(2) Its chain is authentic on the condition of the two Sheikhs, and it was previously lengthened with number (24939), except that the Sheikh of Imam Ahmad here is Yahya: And he is Ibn Sa’id al-Qattan.

There it is—the “authentic” proof of Muhammad’s deviance, kissing (and implying more) while fasting, complete with scholarly nitpicking over chains to pretend it’s reliable. But no amount of isnad juggling hides the truth: This “best man” was a rule-breaker driven by lust.

Muhammad: The “Best Man” or History’s Horniest Hypocrite?

Google’s algorithms, fed by Muslim spam and Hart’s dubious rankings, spit out Muhammad as the ultimate human exemplar—above inventors, philosophers, and saviors. Muslims gloat: “Even infidel search engines confirm our prophet’s supremacy!” But what “greatness” is this? A man who couldn’t fast without pawing his teen wife Aisha, violating the spirit of Ramadan’s self-denial. Fasting in Islam means abstaining from food, drink, and sexual urges from dawn to dusk, yet here Muhammad smooches away, setting a precedent for “pious” perversion. Apologists whine it’s “just kissing,” but the hadith hints at more—linked to “rubbing semen,” implying things escalated. This deviant couldn’t “keep it tight,” as the user puts it, groping during sacred abstinence while demanding followers starve their desires.

And Allah? Not the holy Yahweh of the Bible, but a convenient deity for pervs, rubber-stamping Muhammad’s whims via “revelations” that always favored his libido. Quran 33:51 lets him bed any woman he wants; he marries his adopted son’s wife (Zaynab) after a convenient verse; and now, fasting rules bend for his kisses. Piety? Ha! This is predatory hypocrisy—preaching restraint while indulging, all while Muslims slam Western “degeneracy.” If Muhammad’s the “best,” why disobey his god? Because he was no prophet, just a lustful charlatan whose “Allah” was his alter ego for justifying deviance.

Contrast this with true piety: Biblical figures like Daniel fasted with iron discipline; Jesus endured 40 days without faltering. Muhammad? A kissy-face farce, exposing Islam as a cult built on one man’s unchecked urges. Google’s “best man”? More like history’s biggest fraud—peddling perversion as perfection.

Conclusion: Dethrone the Deviant Icon

Muhammad’s fasting flops unmask him: Not the best man, but a deviant who couldn’t control his base instincts, disobeying his fabricated god while Muslims idolize him. Google be damned—truth exposes the lie. Refuge from this perverse charade; seek real righteousness beyond Islam’s hypocritical haze.

(Word count: 1,256)

Sources

1. Sunnah.com – Hadith on Kissing While Fasting
2. WikiIslam – Muhammad’s Just In Time Revelations
3. Answering-Islam.org – Muhammad’s Sexual Privileges
4. GotQuestions.org – Who Was Muhammad?
5. YouTube – David Wood: Muhammad the Cross-Dresser (Broader Criticisms)
6. Reddit – Ex-Muslim Discussions on Hadith Authenticity
7. Quora – Why Do Muslims Call Muhammad the Best Man?
8. Islam Stack Exchange – Kissing During Fasting Rulings
9. Hart’s “The 100” Book Reviews on Amazon
10. Google Search Trends on “Best Man in History”

Let’s see what people on social media think of it.

On Reddit’s r/exmuslim, users roast the hadith as proof of Muhammad’s “horniness,” joking he couldn’t fast without “Aisha action,” calling it deviant hypocrisy. In r/DebateReligion, critics slam it as lust over piety, contrasting with biblical fasting. Facebook groups like “Ex-Muslims Support” label him a “perv prophet,” tying to child marriage. X posts under #MuhammadExposed mock Google’s “best man” as ironic, with users saying “Can’t fast without kissing? Worst role model!” Defenders on r/islam claim it’s “permissible,” but skeptics dominate with outrage over the double standards.

Arabic Hadith

Kevin baxter Operator

Dr. Kevin Baxter, a distinguished Naval veteran with deep expertise in Middle Eastern affairs and advanced degrees in Quantum Physics, Computer Science, and Artificial Intelligence. a veteran of multiple wars, and a fighter for the truth

See Full Bio