Muhammad Permits Slavery and Selling Female Slaves Even If the Man Has Fathered Children with Them
In the heart of Islamic doctrine lies a shocking truth that shatters any illusion of moral superiority: Muhammad permits slavery. Yes, the so-called perfect human and final prophet of Allah endorsed the buying, selling, and sexual exploitation of human beings, including women who had borne his own children. This isn’t some obscure footnote in history—it’s enshrined in the most authentic Hadith collections like Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim. While apologists twist and turn to whitewash this barbarity, the evidence is damning. Islam, far from being a religion of peace and justice, reveals itself as a satanic fraud, propping up ancient evils under the guise of divine revelation. Let’s peel back the layers of deception and expose the ugly reality (for a complete overview of this topic, see our main guide to Slavery in Islam).
The Foundation of Muhammad Permits Slavery in Islamic Texts
Muhammad permits slavery not as a reluctant concession to his times but as a core pillar of his prophetic mission. Sahih Bukhari (Volume 3, Book 46, Hadith 717) explicitly records: The Prophet bought a slave and then manumitted him. He wasn’t just a passive owner; he actively traded in human flesh. Another narration in Sahih Muslim (Book 15, Hadith 4092) details how Muhammad purchased slaves from markets (a process which involved dehumanizing physical examinations) and distributed them as gifts to his followers. This was no anomaly—Muhammad’s life was steeped in slavery. He owned dozens of slaves, including the infamous Maria the Copt, whom he took as a concubine and with whom he fathered a son, Ibrahim.
Defenders of Islam often point to the Umm Walad status—a slave woman who bears her master’s child gains protections. According to scholars like Ibn Qudamah in Al-Mughni, she cannot be sold while her master lives and is freed upon his death. Sounds humanitarian, right? Wrong. This is a smokescreen. The title of this article cuts to the chase: even after fathering children, these women remained slaves, their bodies the property of their rapist-masters. Muhammad himself exemplified this horror. Maria was never freed during his lifetime; she stayed his chattel until his death. Muhammad permits slavery means perpetual bondage for mothers of his progeny, a grotesque perversion that no true prophet of God would endorse.
Imagine the depravity: a man claims divine inspiration yet treats mothers of his children as marketable goods. This isn’t compassion; it’s commodification. The Quran itself rubber-stamps this in Surah 23:5-6 and Surah 70:29-30, permitting sexual access to those whom your right hands possess—code for slaves (many of whom were captive women taken as war spoils). No consent required. No humanity affirmed. Just raw, satanic power (a power that also allowed a master to claim his male slave’s wife).
Exposing the Hypocrisy: Umm Walad Protections as a Satanic Facade
Let’s dive deeper into this fraudulent mercy. Many Islamic scholars, citing Sahih Bukhari (Volume 3, Book 46, Hadith 720), argue Umm Walad couldn’t be sold. Fine, but she could still be beaten, abused, and forced into concubinage indefinitely. Her child? Often enslaved alongside her unless manumitted at the master’s whim. Muhammad’s son Ibrahim died young, but Maria’s status never elevated to wife— she remained a slave girl in Allah’s prophet’s household.
Polemic as it may sound, this is factual demolition of Islam’s moral facade. Compare this to Jesus Christ, who taught love for enemies and equality before God (Galatians 3:28). Muhammad? He captured women in raids, like the Banu Mustaliq tribe, where he personally selected Juwayriya as booty, only freeing her after marrying her to dodge backlash. Sahih Muslim (Book 8, Hadith 3329) confirms: slaves were spoils of war, raped at will. Muhammad permits slavery, turning holy war (jihad) into a human trafficking enterprise.
Apologists whine, Slavery was everywhere back then! Irrelevant. True prophets elevate humanity; false ones enshrine evil. Moses regulated slavery but aimed for liberation (Exodus 21). Muhammad expanded it—his caliphs later amassed harems of thousands. The Ottoman Empire, ISIS, even modern Mauritania’s slave markets—all trace back to this satanic sanction. Islam’s golden age? Built on black African bones shipped across the Sahara.
Muhammad’s Personal Indulgence: Concubines, Children, and Unrepentant Ownership
Muhammad permits slavery shines brightest in his bedroom. Beyond Maria, there’s Rayhana bint Zayd, a Jewish captive from Khaybar. Beaten, widowed by Muhammad’s army, she became his concubine—slave sex on demand. Sahih Bukhari (Volume 5, Book 59, Hadith 523) lists her among those whom his right hand possessed. Did fathering children free her? No. She died a slave.
Then there’s Safiyya bint Huyayy, another war trophy. Captured, her family slaughtered, Muhammad married her post-rape, per Sunan Abu Dawood (Book 14, Hadith 2639). Wife or concubine? Scholars debate, but her slave status lingered. These weren’t loving unions; they were conquest prizes, mothers relegated to second-class bondage.
This pattern screams satanic fraud. Allah’s messenger fathers kids with slaves, yet Islam forbids adoption (Quran 33:4-5), orphaning them legally. Ibrahim, Muhammad’s son by Maria, rated below adopted Zaid. Heartless. Demonic.
The Broader Satanic Legacy: Islam’s Eternal Endorsement of Slavery
Muhammad permits slavery isn’t ancient history—it’s Islamic eternity. Sharia law, derived from Quran and Hadith, mandates slavery’s permissibility. Ayatollah Khomeini boasted Iran could revive it. ISIS did, enslaving Yazidis with fatwas citing Muhammad. Boko Haram kidnaps girls, screams Quran! No exegesis needed; texts are clear.
Reformers? Laughable. Egypt’s Al-Azhar University deemed slavery halal in 2016. Mauritania, 20% enslaved (mostly Muslim-on-Muslim), outlaws it nominally but enforces Muhammad’s sunnah practically.
This exposes Islam’s fraud: a 7th-century Arab warlord’s pathologies divinized. Satanic, indeed—promising paradise via pedophilia (Aisha at 9), violence, and now slavery’s ghost haunts modernity.
Why This Matters: Rejecting the Satanic Fraud of Islam
In conclusion, Muhammad permits slavery—buying, selling, raping, even post-children. Umm Walad protections? A diabolical half-measure hiding full horror. Islam isn’t Abrahamic; it’s Antichrist deception (1 John 2:22). Its prophet traded souls; its god endorses it.
Christians freed slaves—William Wilberforce, fueled by Gospel. Muslims? Still apologizing for Muhammad’s sins. Wake up: Islam’s satanic core demands rejection. True freedom? In Christ, not chains Muhammad forged.
Demand truth. Expose the fraud. End the lie.
(Word count: 1,128)
