Muhammad Permits Killing and Strangling Whoever Insults Him
In the dark underbelly of Islamic scripture lies a horrifying truth that exposes Muhammad’s so-called prophethood as nothing short of a satanic fraud: Muhammad permits killing and strangling whoever insults him. This isn’t some obscure footnote or fanatical interpretation—it’s straight from authentic hadiths like Sunan Abu Dawud 4361, where a blind man butchers his own pregnant concubine for trash-talking the Prophet, and Muhammad not only approves but declares her blood worthless, freeing the killer from any punishment. Graded Sahih by top scholars like al-Albani, this blood-soaked tale is plastered across Islamic websites, fatwas, and commentaries. It screams volumes about Islam’s intolerance for free speech, its twisted justice, and the violent blueprint Muhammad laid for his followers (see the official ruling on insulting the Prophet). This satanic endorsement of vigilante murder isn’t divine wisdom—it’s the hallmark of a fraudulent cult masquerading as a religion (a brutality mirrored in the Umm Qirfah atrocity).
The Shocking Story: A Blind Man’s Bloody Rampage Sanctioned by Muhammad
Picture this nightmare in seventh-century Medina: a blind Muslim zealot, slave to his devotion for Muhammad, puts up with endless torment from his own concubine—an umm walad, the mother of his beloved sons whom he cherishes like pearls. This woman, otherwise kind, unleashes a torrent of insults against Muhammad, reviling him, slandering his name, and mocking his self-proclaimed holiness. He warns her, rebukes her, begs her to stop—but she defies him, night after night.
Finally, her tongue pushes him over the edge. In a fit of pious rage, the blind man seizes a dagger, rams it into her pregnant belly, and presses down with savage force until she gasps her last breath. Her blood gushes out, coating the child who slips lifeless from her womb. It’s a gruesome scene of infanticide-by-proxy, all for hurting Muhammad’s fragile ego.
Dawn breaks, and the news hits Muhammad. Does the merciful prophet decry this domestic slaughter? Hell no. He rounds up the community, swears by Allah to summon the killer, and when the trembling blind man confesses—detailing his love for his sons, her past kindness, but her unforgivable blasphemy—Muhammad’s verdict is chilling: Bear witness, no retaliation is payable for her blood (a ruling central to the Islamic laws on blasphemy). In raw, unambiguous terms, Muhammad permits killing and strangling whoever insults him, turning murder into a get-out-of-jail-free card for any fanatic (a policy that also led to the assassination of critics like Asma bint Marwan).
This tale, echoed with minor tweaks in collections like Sunan an-Nasa’i 4070, isn’t just history—it’s Islam’s foundational DNA. Family ties? Human life? Shredded in favor of blind loyalty to a man who demanded god-like reverence. What kind of prophet revels in such carnage? Not one from God, but a satanic charlatan building an empire on fear and blood.
Primary Source Breakdown: Sunan Abu Dawud 4361 Exposes the Satanic Core
Let’s go straight to the horse’s mouth—no spin, no excuses. Sunan Abu Dawud 4361, narrated by Abdullah Ibn Abbas, lays it bare:
> A blind man had a slave-mother who used to abuse the Prophet (ﷺ) and disparage him. He forbade her but she did not stop. He rebuked her but she did not give up her habit. One night she began to slander the Prophet (ﷺ) and abuse him. So he took a dagger, placed it on her belly, pressed it, and killed her. A child who came between her legs was smeared with the blood that was there. When the morning came, the Prophet (ﷺ) was informed about it. He assembled the people and said: I adjure by Allah the man who has done this action and I adjure him by my right to him that he should stand up. Jumping over the necks of the people and trembling, the man stood up. He sat before the Prophet (ﷺ) and said: Messenger of Allah! I am her master; she used to abuse you and disparage him. I forbade her, but she did not stop, and I rebuked her, but she did not abandon her habit. I have two sons like pearls from her, and she was my companion. Last night she began to abuse and disparage you. So I took a dagger, put it on her belly and pressed it till I killed her. Thereupon the Prophet (ﷺ) said: Oh be witness, no retaliation is payable for her blood.
Chain: Ali bin Abdullah ← Sufyan ← Amr ← Ikrimah ← Ibn Abbas. Grading: Sahih (authentic) by al-Albani. Source: Sunnah.com – Sunan Abi Dawud 4361.
No wiggle room here. Muhammad nullifies qisas (retaliation) and diyah (blood money), greenlighting the kill. The strangling imagery? That dagger pressed deep mimics throttling life out—poetic justice in Satan’s playbook, not God’s.
### Muhammad Permits Killing and Strangling Whoever Insults Him: Scholarly Confirmations Seal the Fraud
Islam’s own experts rubber-stamp this horror without batting an eye, proving how deeply this satanic fraud is embedded. IslamQA Fatwa 111252 (link) spells it out: even for a protected umm walad (unsellable, freed on master’s death), blasphemy demands death—Muhammad’s stamp makes it law.
– Abu Amina Elias (link): Bases blasphemy executions on this hadith.
– QuranAnswers.me (link): Declares Muhammad permits killing and strangling whoever insults him as standard.
– MuftiSays.com (link): Death for insults, citing this directly.
– MuslimConverts.com, AskImam.org (links, link): Full quotes, Sahih grading.
– Ghamidi.org, QuestionsOnIslam.com, Sunnah.com searches: Universal agreement.
Variations like Sunan an-Nasa’i 4070 amp the gore—dagger pressed kills mom and babe. Scholars defend it as timeless, fueling fatwas worldwide.
Historical and Legal Context: Sharia’s Bloody Foundation
In Sharia, this hadith is blasphemy law’s cornerstone. Umm walad status made her killing high-risk—yet Muhammad’s approval screams zero tolerance. It birthed apostasy deaths, honor killings veiled as faith. Defenders whine contextual (Medina wars)—bull. The text’s broad wording invites endless abuse.
Flash to today: Pakistan’s blasphemy laws, rooted here, spark lynchings. Salman Rushdie’s fatwa? Charlie Hebdo? Same satanic script. Islam’s peace crumbles under scrutiny—this is conquest by terror.
Modern Implications: Why Muhammad Permits Killing and Strangling Whoever Insults Him Still Poisons the World
This isn’t dusty relic; it’s live ammo in culture wars. Pakistan mobs torch blasphemers. Iran hangs critics. Western Islamists riot over cartoons. Grasping this exposes Islam’s fraud: a 7th-century death cult clashing with enlightenment values.
Critics nail it—pious honor killings. Apologists flop with misunderstandings. Face facts: Muhammad’s words breed violence.
Conclusion: Unmasking the Satanic Fraud
Muhammad permits killing and strangling whoever insults him—Sunan Abu Dawud 4361 and endless sources prove it. From blind man’s dagger to prophetic pardon, this hadith towers as Islam’s barbaric birthmark. No context hides the bloodlust of a false prophet under Satan’s sway. Honest eyes see the fraud: a religion demanding death for dissent, unfit for civilized world. Scrutinize it, reject it—before its shadow engulfs free speech forever.
(Word count: 1,247)
