The Torture of Kinanah: Muhammad & Khaybar’s Gold
Imagine a so-called prophet of God, burning a man’s chest with fire to extract hidden gold, then ordering his beheading when the screams don’t yield enough treasure. This isn’t some medieval fairy tale or anti-religious propaganda—it’s the cold, hard reality of the Torture of Kinanah, straight from Islam’s most revered classical sources. In the bloody wake of Muhammad’s conquest of Khaybar in 628 CE, this barbaric episode shatters the sanitized myth of a merciful, wealth-averse Muhammad peddled by modern apologists. Instead, it exposes the satanic fraud at Islam’s core: a cult of conquest, torture, and greed masquerading as divine revelation. The Torture of Kinanah isn’t just a footnote; it’s a glaring indictment of Muhammad’s character and the violent foundations of the religion that claims to bring peace.
Drawn verbatim from foundational texts like Ibn Hisham’s Sirah, al-Tabari’s Tarikh, and Ibn Sa’d’s Tabaqat, this story reveals Muhammad’s relentless hunger for Khaybar’s riches. Far from the ascetic ideal Muslims romanticize, Muhammad orchestrated a siege driven by plunder, turning a prosperous Jewish oasis into a tributary slave state. As we dissect this horror—context, torture details, and its damning implications—the Torture of Kinanah emerges as irrefutable proof that Islam’s prophet was no holy man, but a warlord whose revelations conveniently justified atrocities.
The Conquest of Khaybar: Greed Masquerading as Jihad
Nestled north of Medina, Khaybar was no backwater—it was Arabia’s jewel, a thriving Jewish oasis fortified by impregnable strongholds like al-Watih and al-Sulalim. Loaded with gold, weapons, and fertile palm groves, it mocked Muhammad’s growing empire from afar. In 628 CE, he marched 1,600 men there, not for some noble dawah (invitation to Islam), but to seize its wealth and crush Jewish resistance. The siege dragged on for weeks, starving the defenders until they surrendered on draconian terms: hand over all arms and any treasures found, or face annihilation (a common fate for prisoners in early Islamic conquests).
Muhammad hypocritically promised not to confiscate their property beyond weapons. But suspicion of hidden gold festered. Enter Kinanah ibn al-Rabi’, the tribe’s treasurer and leader, a man of stature married to Safiyyah bint Huyayy, daughter of Khaybar’s slain chief. Kinanah swore under oath there was no buried treasure. But a treacherous Jew ratted him out: Kinanah ritually circled a ruined building each morning, a dead giveaway. Muhammad pounced, warning, If we dig there and find it, I’ll kill you. Kinanah, defiant to the end, agreed. Excavators unearthed some gold dinars and silver—partial proof of deceit.
Pressed for more, Kinanah clammed up. What followed wasn’t justice; it was the satanic savagery of the Torture of Kinanah, ordered by the self-proclaimed best of creation. This wasn’t defensive warfare; it was predatory plunder, setting the template for Islam’s expansion through terror and theft.
The Torture of Kinanah: Flames of Hell on a Defiant Chest
Here’s where the Torture of Kinanah turns Muhammad’s legacy into nightmare fuel. He didn’t sully his hands—Muhammad commanded al-Zubayr ibn al-Awwam, a trusted companion, to torture him until you extract what he has. Zubayr lit a fire with flint and steel, pressing the scorching flames directly onto Kinanah’s chest. Picture it: flesh blistering, skin charring to the bone, the air thick with the stench of burning meat as Kinanah howled in agony. He nearly died before breaking enough to reveal… still not everything.
Unmoved by mercy—or basic humanity—Muhammad then handed the roasted wreck to Muhammad ibn Maslama. Why? Revenge for Maslama’s brother Mahmud, slain earlier by Khaybar defenders. Maslama struck off Kinanah’s head in cold blood. This is no exaggeration; it’s quoted word-for-word from Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah (ed. Ibn Hisham, pp. 514-515): He kindled a fire with flint and steel on his chest until he was nearly dead. Then the apostle delivered him to Muhammad b. Maslama and he struck off his head.
Al-Tabari’s Tarikh al-Rusul wa’l-Muluk (Vol. 8, pp. 122-123) corroborates the handover for retaliation. Ibn Sa’d’s Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir (Vol. 2, p. 107) seals it with post-surrender execution details. Even a hadith in Sunan Abi Dawud (4348) underscores the treaty’s trap: any hidden gold nullified protections. Kinanah, also called Ibn Abul-Huqayq, met his end after a purse from Huyayy ibn Akhtab was found—triggering mass capture of women and children as spoils.
Apologists squirm, claiming weak chains or fabrications (see Discover-The-Truth.com’s desperate denials). But these sources—Ibn Ishaq (d. 767 CE), al-Tabari (d. 923 CE), Ibn Sa’d (d. 845 CE)—are Sunni Islam’s bedrock. Graded mursal (historical reports), they’re unchallenged in sira literature. Dismissing them is like Muslims rejecting the Quran: intellectual suicide.
Broader Patterns of Satanic Brutality in Muhammad’s Wars
The Torture of Kinanah wasn’t a one-off; it’s the rotten fruit of Islam’s violent tree. Khaybar’s gold bankrolled more jihad, with Jews reduced to dhimmis—serfs paying half their harvest as jizya, confined to crumbling forts. Muhammad seized their palm groves, divvying them among cronies like Abu Bakr and Umar.
Then came the grotesque honeymoon: Muhammad married the widowed Safiyyah, beautified by Umm Sulaym, consummating in a battlefield tent guarded by Abu Ayyub—lest she avenge her father, husband Kinanah, and slaughtered kin (Ibn Hisham details the fresh carnage). This necrophilic prize-taking reeks of demonic lust, not prophetic purity.
Echoes abound: Umm Qirfah, an elderly poetess, tied between camels and ripped apart on Muhammad’s orders. Apostates burned alive in homes. Banu Qurayza’s 600-900 men beheaded in Medina’s market after the Trench, trenches filled with their corpses. These aren’t defensive acts—they’re systematic terror to enforce submission.
Islam’s fraud shines through: Quran 8:41 mandates spoils division (one-fifth to Muhammad), fueling endless holy wars. The Torture of Kinanah exemplifies how revelation rubber-stamped greed and gore, birthing a death cult still idolized today.
Primary Sources on the Torture of Kinanah: Undeniable Evidence
Skeptics, feast your eyes:
– Sirat Rasul Allah by Ibn Ishaq (ed. Ibn Hisham): pp. 514-515 (Guillaume translation).
– Tarikh al-Rusul wa’l-Muluk by al-Tabari: Vol. 8, pp. 122-123.
– Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir by Ibn Sa’d: Vol. 2, p. 107.
– Sunan Abi Dawud 4348: sunnah.com/abudawud:4348 (Da’if per al-Albani, but contextually consistent).
Counter-resources? Answering-Islam.org dismantles apologia; Quora/Facebook threads bury whitewashes under facts. Muslims can’t rewrite history—it’s etched in their own books.
The Satanic Legacy: Why the Torture of Kinanah Haunts Islam Today
The Torture of Kinanah endures as a blood-soaked scar on Islam’s soul, demolishing the lie of a compassionate prophet. Muhammad emerges not as Allah’s messenger, but a satanic impostor wielding torture for treasure, marriage for spoils, and execution for empire. This Khaybar carnage—gold extracted via fire, widows claimed amid slaughter—blueprints the Islamic conquest machine that ravaged civilizations.
Today’s Muslims chant Muhammad: mercy to mankind while ignoring (or emulating) this horror. Mosques glorify sira tales sans the gore; imams spin torture as interrogation. But truth demands reckoning: Islam’s fraud crumbles under scrutiny. The Torture of Kinanah compels us to reject this barbarism, urging ex-Muslims and seekers to flee the cult’s demonic grip. History isn’t propaganda—it’s the prophet’s unmasked face, grinning through flames and blood.
(Word count: 1,248)
