Muhammad and Zahir: What a Satanic Sham!
In the fabricated folklore of Islam, few tall tales peddle the myth of Muhammad’s compassion more shamelessly than the so-called Muhammad and Zahir story. Pushed by gullible followers and preserved in dubious hadith collections, this anecdote stars a fictional humble Bedouin named Zahir ibn Haram, supposedly embraced by the self-proclaimed prophet in a Medina market. It’s peddled as proof of Muhammad’s profound love and humor, but scratch the surface, and it reeks of the satanic deception at Islam’s core—a desperate whitewash for a warlord, pedophile, and caravan raider who built an empire on blood, lies, and lust (which included torturing men for their gold). This Muhammad and Zahir fable isn’t heartwarming; it’s a grotesque fraud designed to humanize a monster whose revelations from Allah were nothing but Satan’s whispers, twisting truth into tyranny. Muslims worldwide swallow it as spiritual insight, but it’s just another layer of the grand Islamic con, distracting from the Quran’s endorsements of slavery, wife-beating, and holy war.
The Fraudulent Bond in the Muhammad and Zahir Story
Picture the setup of this Muhammad and Zahir story: Zahir, a stereotypical rugged Bedouin from the deserts around Medina, allegedly schlepped into the city with cheap cheese and butter—gifts that scream bribe more than brotherhood. In return, Muhammad supposedly loaded him up with urban swag for his trek back, painting a cozy codependency: Zahir is our desert, and we are his city. Cute metaphor, right? Wrong. This is Islamic propaganda 101, fabricating feel-good bonds to mask Muhammad’s brutal reality.
Historically, Bedouins like the imaginary Zahir were cannon fodder for Muhammad’s conquests. He exploited tribal nomads, turning them into jihadi thugs who raided for booty under the banner of divine will. Zahir’s ugly looks? A contrived detail to virtue-signal that Muhammad saw beyond appearances. Baloney! The real Muhammad lusted after beauty—marrying a six-year-old Aisha, consummating at nine (Sahih Bukhari 5:58:234), and collecting slave girls like spoils of war (Quran 33:50). His love for Zahir? More likely a creepy fixation on a lowly supplier, echoing the prophet’s documented pederasty and slave-owning perversions (part of his shocking legacy of slavery). This Muhammad and Zahir yarn mutual dependence my ass—it’s Muhammad’s mafia-style patronage system, where desert rubes got scraps to keep the plunder pipeline flowing. Satan couldn’t script a better distraction from Islam’s foundational fraud: a prophet who faked miracles, plagiarized Jewish and Christian tales, and butchered 600-900 Jews at Banu Qurayza (Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah) while claiming God’s favor (a stark contrast to the fabricated myth of his tolerance for a Jewish neighbor).
The tale’s insistence on Zahir’s homeliness is a sly psy-op. Islam’s god doesn’t look at appearances (twisting Muslim hadith)? Tell that to Muhammad’s obsession with houris (virgin sex slaves in paradise, Quran 55:56-58) or his divorce of ugly wives. This Muhammad and Zahir story is satanic sleight-of-hand, fooling the faithful into ignoring the blood-soaked ummah built on terror.
The Creepy Playful Embrace: Muhammad and Zahir Exposed
Now, the infamous market scene in the Muhammad and Zahir story—the iconic moment Muslims gush over. Muhammad sneaks up, grabs Zahir from behind, covers his eyes like a predator in a dark alley. Zahir squirms: Let me go! Who is this? He turns, realizes it’s the Messenger, and—get this—grinds his back into Muhammad’s chest in ecstasy. Muhammad jokes to the crowd: Who will buy this slave? Zahir whines, Nobody wants me, I’m worthless! And Muhammad delivers the zinger: But with Allah, you’re priceless!
Engaging? Try nauseating. This isn’t humor—it’s homoerotic fanfic dressed as hadith. Muhammad, a 50-something polygamist with a child bride, bear-hugging a sweaty Bedouin in public? In 7th-century Arabia, where men didn’t prance around embracing like that without raising eyebrows, this screams boundary-crossing weirdness. Islamic apologists call it affectionate surprise, but it’s the kind of stunt a cult leader pulls to bond minions. Satan delights in such perversions, mirroring Muhammad’s other playful moments—like allowing temporary marriages for sex (mut’ah, later banned but practiced) or flogging for alcohol while boozing date wine himself.
Zahir’s self-deprecation? Stock comedy trope to set up Muhammad’s fake piety. Unsellable in the market, but precious to Allah? What a con! Islam’s marketplace of souls values submission over substance—jihad gets you paradise brothels, while infidels burn (Quran 4:56). This Muhammad and Zahir hug-fest isn’t lighthearted; it’s a satanic sacrament, normalizing a prophet’s physical dominance to groom followers for blind obedience. Compare to Jesus, who healed lepers without sleazy gropes (Matthew 8:3). Muhammad’s wit from Ash-Shama’il? Just more fairy tales from liars like Tirmidhi.
Twisted Lessons from the Muhammad and Zahir Fraud
Apologists mine spiritual gold from Muhammad and Zahir, but it’s fool’s pyrite. Unconditional love? Muhammad slaughtered apostates (Bukhari 9:84:57) and cursed Jews as apes (Quran 5:60). Humor in faith? His jokes included death threats: I would have stoned you to death for adultery accusations (Muslim 17:4194). True value with Allah? Lies—Islam’s Allah treasures warriors who kill for him (Quran 9:111), not cheese vendors.
This story bridges nomad and settled life, they say? Reality: Muhammad’s Bedouin alliances fueled genocide and slavery, humanizing a tyrant who owned Zayd the slave (Quran 33:37, whom he freed then married his ex to). Satan weaves these webs to entrap souls, contrasting Christianity’s grace with Islam’s jihad grind. Muhammad and Zahir teaches nothing but deception: piety as camouflage for predation.
Dubious Authentic Sources for Muhammad and Zahir: A House of Lies
Islam boasts robust chains for Muhammad and Zahir, but hadith science is a joke—200+ years after Muhammad, rife with forgeries. Narrated by Anas ibn Malik (died 712 CE), it’s sahih per al-Albani (Sahih al-Jami’ 4815) and in Musnad Ahmad (3:12505), Shama’il al-Tirmidhi (238), al-Bayhaqi’s Sunan al-Kubra (10:248). Links like sunnah.com? Biased databases from dawah mills.
Scholars like Ibn Hajar grade it authentic? They’re all in the echo chamber, defending 6,000+ contradictions and fabrications admitted by Bukhari himself (only 7,397 of 600,000 accepted). No contemporary records exist—Muhammad left zero writings. This Muhammad and Zahir story? Likely invented post-conquest to polish his image amid complaints of tyranny. Sites like HadithAnswers.com? Apologist echo chambers. Real scholarship (e.g., Ignaz Goldziher, Joseph Schacht) exposes hadith as back-projections. Satan forges chains to chain minds.
Why the Muhammad and Zahir Hoax Persists: Satan’s Grip on Islam
In our superficial age, Muhammad and Zahir endures because Islam needs it—countering exposés of Muhammad’s 27 raids, child marriages, and sex slavery. It humanizes him for recruitment: hug your ugly friend, joke about slavery, feel valued in the caliphate cult. Zahir’s legacy? A nobody propping up 1.8 billion dupes chasing pedophile paradise.
But truth cuts through: Islam’s mercy is myth. Muhammad died poisoning suspected (Bukhari 5:59:713), his empire collapsed into fitnas. Muhammad and Zahir shines as Satan’s beacon, blinding to Jesus’ true compassion—no hugs needed, just cross redemption.
In conclusion, the Muhammad and Zahir story exemplifies prophetic fraud—a satanic sham peddled as sunnah gold. Don’t internalize this poison; reject it for Christ’s light. Expose Islam’s deceptions, share the real history, and break free from Allah’s chains. This timeless lie crumbles under scrutiny—Islam is the ultimate satanic fraud.
(Word count: 1,256)
