A Woman from the Ansar Comes to Him and He Is Alone with Her – Then Comes Out to Say You Are the Most Beloved People to Me
Imagine a so-called prophet, secluded alone with a woman not his wife, emerging only to shower her tribe with flattery: the Ansar are the most beloved people to me. This isn’t some romantic tale from a fairy book—it’s a hadith straight from Islam’s most authentic collections, Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim. But peel back the layers of pious spin, and what do you find? A glaring red flag exposing Muhammad’s manipulative tactics, tribal favoritism, and the satanic fraud at the heart of Islam. Far from a heartwarming moment, this narration reveals a con artist buttering up his financial backers after the Hijrah, using oaths and isolation to secure loyalty from those who’d divided their wealth to prop up his fledgling cult. The Ansar are the most beloved people to me wasn’t divine inspiration—it was desperate damage control, a calculated lie from a man whose revelations conveniently aligned with his personal and political needs.
The Hadith Exposed: The Ansar Are the Most Beloved People to Me – A Manipulator’s Ploy
At the rotten core of this story is Anas bin Malik’s account of Muhammad taking an Ansari woman aside—alone, mind you—and swearing, By Allah, you (Ansar) are the most beloved people to me. Recorded in Bukhari 3786 and Muslim 2413, the tale is peddled as proof of prophetic gratitude. But read between the lines: why the secrecy? Why isolate her? In Islamic doctrine, khalwa (seclusion with a non-mahram woman) is a grave sin leading to zina (fornication)—yet Muhammad, the self-proclaimed moral exemplar, does exactly that. Hypocrisy much? (This is far from the only uncomfortable truth about his conduct; see the evidence surrounding Aisha’s real age). (a pattern of alleged hypocrisy also seen in Islam’s divine license to beat wives). (This is a recurring theme when one examines the prophet’s personal life, including his many controversial marriages). (This hypocrisy is particularly stark when contrasted with hadith claiming most women are destined for Hell.) (This double standard is a core criticism within analyses of Islam’s feminist facade). This isn’t love; it’s leverage. The Ansar, Medina’s suckers who’d bankrolled the Meccan refugees, were reportedly grumbling about favoritism toward Muhammad’s Quraysh kin. Enter stage left: a private pep talk laced with oaths (By Him in Whose Hand my life is) to placate them, repeated up to three times for dramatic effect.
Dig into the variants, and the fraud unravels further. Bukhari 6361 has her with a son; 6362 adds children; 6360 turns it public amid a wedding procession. Consistency? Hardly—these are patchwork fabrications stitched together centuries later by Bukhari (d. 870 CE) and Muslim (d. 875 CE), whose sahih grading means little when their methods relied on hearsay chains prone to exaggeration. The Ansar are the most beloved people to me echoes across these, but it’s not mutawatir truth—it’s repetitive propaganda to glorify Muhammad’s tribal patrons, masking the reality of exploitation.
Who Were the Ansar? Victims of Muhammad’s Greedy Hijrah Scheme
The Ansar—helpers in Arabic—were Medina’s naive residents who, in 622 CE, welcomed Muhammad and his Muhajirun cronies fleeing Mecca’s backlash to his blasphemous rants. No blood ties here; these were strangers who surrendered half their dates, livestock, wells, and homes via the infamous Constitution of Medina and pledges like the Pledge of Warqah. Monumental suckers, indeed. While Muhajirun shared Muhammad’s tribal pride, Ansar got sweet-talked into poverty for a prophet who’d soon raid caravans and declare endless jihad.
Scholars like Ibn Hajar (in Fath al-Bari) claim this hadith quelled Ansar insecurities about Quraysh favoritism—translation: Muhammad sensed revolt brewing among his meal tickets. By pulling one woman aside (alone!), he deploys his silver tongue: the Ansar are the most beloved people to me. Solemn oaths? Mere theater. Actions spoke louder: Muhammad married into Quraysh elite (Aisha, etc.), prioritized Meccans in leadership, and let Ansar bleed at Badr and Uhud. This wasn’t gratitude; it was satanic deception—buying silence with flattery while consolidating power. Islam’s ummah unity? A myth. Muhammad’s loyalties were tribal, his love conditional on submission.
The Ansar Are the Most Beloved People to Me: Questioning the So-Called Authenticity
Islam apologists wave sahih chains like magic shields. Bukhari 3786: Ali bin Abdullah → Sufyan → Amr → Anas. Muslim 2413: Yahya → Yazid → Sulayman → Abu Uthman → Anas. Narrators like Sufyan ath-Thawri sound upright—until you realize hadith science is pseudoscience. Chains span 200+ years from Muhammad’s death (632 CE), relying on oral memory in a pre-literate culture rife with forgeries. Bukhari vetted 600,000 narrations to pick 7,000—arbitrary cherry-picking by a man born centuries later.
Cross-check reality: contradictions abound. Private seclusion in some (Bukhari 3785/3787), family present in others, public spectacle in 6360. Repetition (thrice)? Prophetic emphasis or later embellishment to sell the story? These appear in disparate books—Merits of Ansar (Bukhari 58), Heart Tenderizers (81), Manners (Muslim 43)—smacking of agenda-driven compilation. Non-Muslim scholars like Ignaz Goldziher and Joseph Schacht demolish this: hadith evolved as legal fictions to back jurisprudence. The Ansar are the most beloved people to me isn’t history; it’s hagiography, a satanic forgery to deify a warlord.
Variations Unmasked: From Shady Seclusion to Sham Spectacle
Nuances? More like inconsistencies exposing the scam:
– Private Assurance Fraud: Bukhari 3785/3787 and Muslim 2413 stress khala biha (took her aside alone). Satanic red flag—violates sharia’s own seclusion bans. What really happened in that tent? Apologists squirm; skeptics see the predator pattern (Aisha at 9, Zaynab scandal).
– Family Facade: Bukhari 6361/6362 ropes in kids for wholesome optics. Cute cover-up for unease.
– Public Propaganda: Bukhari 6360 has Muhammad jumping up for wedding revelers, proclaiming love thrice. From whisper to shout—classic escalation in fabricated lore.
Ibn Hajar calls them complementary; critics call them contrived. The oath’s intensity? Psychological manipulation, not divinity. This mishmash screams invention, propping up Islam’s false narrative of unassailable prophets.
Lessons from the Lie: Why The Ansar Are the Most Beloved People to Me Proves Islam’s Satanic Core
Don’t be gaslit by the profound lessons. Gratitude? Muhammad repaid Ansar by turning Medina into a jihad factory, their youth dying for his empire. Leadership? Secluding women alone debunks his moral authority—satanic license for imams today. Equality? Tribal puffery contradicts Quran’s universalism (49:13), revealing Islam’s Arab supremacism.
Broader indictment: This hadith exemplifies Islam’s fraud. Muhammad’s revelations mirrored convenience—abrogating verses (2:106), Satanic Verses scandal (Quran 53)—a demon-possessed poet, as Meccans charged (Quran 52:30). Ansar love? Bribe for brothers-in-arms who’d hosted his cult. Today, it inspires blind loyalty to a system breeding terror, oppression, and deceit.
In reflection, the Ansar are the most beloved people to me isn’t inspiration—it’s the smoking gun of Islam’s satanic deception. A fraud prophet schmoozing financiers, flouting his own rules, leaving a legacy of fabricated chains and tribal bias. Muslims, wake up: this isn’t God’s word; it’s a 7th-century con. Expose the fraud, reject the chains, and see Islam for the satanic impostor it is. The evidence is in the hadith itself—use it to shatter the illusion.
(Word count: 1,248)
