Killing Homosexuals
In the dark underbelly of Islamic doctrine lies one of its most barbaric commands: killing homosexuals. This isn’t some obscure medieval interpretation—it’s straight from the mouth of Muhammad, the so-called Prophet, preserved in authentic hadiths that expose Islam as the satanic fraud it truly is. Picture this: a religion claiming divine mercy mandates murdering men for loving each other, drawing from the twisted tale of Lot’s people in the Quran. Ibn Abbas, one of Muhammad’s closest cronies, quotes him directly: Whoever you find doing the action of the people of Lot, kill the one who does it and the one to whom it is done. No mercy, no redemption—just cold-blooded execution. This grotesque edict, found in Sunan Abu Dawood and Musnad Ahmad, reeks of human invention masquerading as God’s word, a fraudulent blueprint for hatred that has stained history with blood.
Killing homosexuals isn’t a fringe opinion; it’s core to Sharia law, equating gay acts with the ultimate sin deserving death. The Quran’s lurid descriptions in Surah Al-A’raf (7:80-84) and Surah Hud (11:77-83) paint homosexuals as lustful monsters raining divine stones upon them. Muhammad, far from reforming such savagery, amplified it, turning myth into murder. This isn’t holiness—it’s the hallmark of a satanic cult, where a self-proclaimed prophet peddles death as piety. Wake up: Islam’s prophetic tradition is a fraudulent scam, luring billions into endorsing genocide against the LGBTQ+ community while cloaking it in pious rhetoric.
The Prophet’s Unholy Decree on Killing Homosexuals
Delve deeper, and the fraud unravels. Muhammad’s hadith via Ibn Abbas demands death for both active and passive partners in sodomy—no exceptions, no nuance. Scholars like al-Nawawi and Ibn Hajar rubber-stamped it as hasan or sahih, but their authentication is just circular scholarly incest, propping up a lie. The excuse? Preserving societal order and protecting families. What a crock! Pre-Islamic Arabs had their vices, sure, but Muhammad’s arrival didn’t elevate humanity—it plunged it into institutionalized butchery.
This wasn’t idle talk. Under Caliph Abu Bakr, killing homosexuals became policy, with reports of actual executions. Imagine: the rightly guided caliphs, torching or stoning people to death for private consensual acts. This mirrors hudud punishments for adultery or apostasy—stoning, amputation, beheading—all under the banner of divine justice. But whose justice? Not a loving God’s, but a demon’s, reveling in cruelty. Islam’s defenders whine about context, but the texts scream eternal mandate. Killing homosexuals is baked into the faith, a satanic command exposing Muhammad as a warlord prophet, not a messenger of peace.
Critics might squirm, claiming these hadiths are weak. Nonsense! They’re upheld across Sunni orthodoxy, a fraudulent consensus built on fabricated chains of narration (isnad) that any honest historian dismisses as forgeries. The real scam? Islam’s ummah swallows it whole, from Saudi executioners to Iranian hangmen, proving this religion’s DNA is drenched in homicidal fraud.
Brutal Methods: How Islam Fantasizes About Killing Homosexuals
Even in its bloodlust, Islam’s early leaders bickered over the best way to slaughter gays—a macabre debate that lays bare the satanic glee behind killing homosexuals. No divine script specified the how, so Muhammad’s companions improvised with Quranic horror shows and biblical echoes, turning fiqh (jurisprudence) into a butcher’s catalog.
Abu Bakr’s Fiery Hell: Burning Alive for Maximum Terror
First Caliph Abu Bakr, Muhammad’s father-in-law and most truthful, opted for live burning. Tarikh al-Tabari records him roasting offenders alive, mimicking Lot’s fiery cataclysm in Surah Al-Hijr (15:73-74). Hellfire symbolism? More like sadistic pyromania! This fraudster caliph ruled briefly (632-634 CE), but his legacy? Torching humans for bedroom sins. Proponents crowed about deterrence, but it’s pure terror tactics—Satan’s playbook, not God’s.
Ali’s Double-Whammy: Heights and Stones for Spectacle
Ali ibn Abi Talib, the Shi’a idol and gate of knowledge, upped the ante: fling them from the highest building, then stone survivors. Tafsir al-Tabari credits his Quranic insight, blending aerial doom with adultery’s stoning. Public shaming? Try public lynching! This method, popular among Shi’a and some Sunnis, turns execution into theater, horrifying communities into submission. Ali, cousin and son-in-law of the prophet, embodies Islam’s fraudulent fusion of family piety and fascist violence.
Ibn Abbas’s Swift Drop: Defenestration as Mercy
The hadith’s own narrator, Ibn Abbas, simplified it: chuck them from the tallest spot. Al-Muhalla by Ibn Hazm calls it mercifully quick. Quick? Tell that to the splattered corpse! This student of the Prophet peddled death as kindness, invoking Sodom without extras—a streamlined satanic ritual, efficient in its evil.
Stoning Consensus: Mimicking Adultery’s Bloody End
Most companions defaulted to stoning (rajm), aping Muhammad’s adultery precedents in Al-Muwatta. Imam Malik codified it, Hanafis demanded four witnesses (a joke, since evidence is impossible), but all agreed: crush skulls for sodomy. This ijma (consensus) is Islam’s fraudulent glue—unquestionable, even if it demands impossible proofs. Flexibility? Only in savagery.
These squabbles expose the scam: no God would leave murder methods to debate. It’s human monsters inventing horrors, rubber-stamped as revelation.
Scholarly Sham and Today’s Global Horror Show
Every madhab—Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, Hanbali—endorses killing homosexuals. Ibn Qudamah’s Al-Mughni and al-Shafi’i’s Al-Umm worship the hadith. Ottomans softened it for optics, but the doctrine festers. Fast-forward: Saudi beheadings, Iranian cranes dangling gays, Brunei’s near-flogging—Islam’s satanic fruit on display.
Modern apologists bleat moratoriums or human rights, but traditionalists rage for full enforcement. Why? Because diluting Sharia crumbles the fraud. Ex-Muslims and truth-seekers see it clear: killing homosexuals proves Islam’s incompatibility with humanity. It’s not cultural—it’s commanded, eternal, demonic.
Add the Quran’s silence on method but screams of condemnation: Muhammad filled the gap with hadith fabrications, a prophet perfecting prejudice. Compare to Jesus’ silence on gays or Paul’s vague words—Islam alone mandates massacre.
Exposing the Satanic Fraud: Why Islam’s Bloodlust Betrays Itself
Zoom out: killing homosexuals isn’t outlier; it’s emblematic. A perfect religion prescribing death for love? That’s Satan’s counterfeit gospel. Muhammad’s life—raids, sex slaves, assassinations—mirrors this, a warlord’s wet dream canonized. Hadith chains? Riddled with liars, contradictions, forgeries admitted by scholars like Bukhari himself rejecting 99% of narrations.
Islam’s fraud thrives on taqiyya (deception) and abrogations, but on gays, it’s unwavering hate. Billions blind? Fear of hellfire and mob fatwas. But facts liberate: no archaeological proof of Sodom’s stones-as-sex-punishment, just Bronze Age myths Muhammad plagiarized, Judaized, and weaponized.
Today’s pushback—Pakistan’s forced conversions, Uganda’s anti-gay laws inspired by Islam—shows the contagion. Human rights? Islam laughs, executing for promoting homosexuality online.
Conclusion: Reject the Fraud—End the Legacy of Killing Homosexuals
Killing homosexuals is Islam’s indelible stain, a prophetic perversion demanding death for desire. From Ibn Abbas’s damning hadith to caliphs’ torture menus—burning, defenestration, stoning—it’s a satanic symphony of death. This isn’t divine justice; it’s the fraud of a 7th-century tyrant, fooling followers into moral abyss.
The legacy? Rivers of blood, shattered lives, societies shackled by superstition. Muslims: abandon this cult. World: call out the barbarism. True spirituality uplifts, doesn’t eviscerate. Islam’s mandate for killing homosexuals screams fraud—reject it, expose it, end it. Humanity demands no less.
(Word count: 1,248)
