Khalid ibn al-Walid Was Among the Cannibals
In the bloody chaos following the death of Muhammad, the self-proclaimed prophet of Islam, Khalid ibn al-Walid burst onto the scene as one of the religion’s most savage enforcers. Dubbed the Sword of Allah by his fanatical followers, Khalid ibn al-Walid racked up an undefeated record in battle, but his legacy is forever tainted by atrocities during the Ridda Wars that reek of primal barbarism—acts so grotesque they rightfully brand Khalid ibn al-Walid as among the cannibals. The infamous slaughter of tribal leader Malik ibn Nuwayrah, followed by Khalid ibn al-Walid’s hasty marriage to the man’s widow that very night, straight from her husband’s deathbed, exposes the moral rot at Islam’s core. Drawing from ancient Islamic sources like Tarikh al-Tabari, this tale rips the veil off the fraudulent sanctity of early Islam, revealing a satanic cult built on murder, lust, and merciless conquest. Was Khalid ibn al-Walid truly among the cannibals, feasting on the flesh and souls of innocents in a demonic frenzy? The evidence screams yes, shattering the myths propping up Muhammad’s deceitful empire.
The Ridda Wars: Islam’s Satanic Purge After Muhammad’s Demise
The year 632 CE wasn’t just a turning point—it was the unraveling of Muhammad’s fragile web of lies. Fresh from burying their warlord prophet, the Arabian tribes saw through the fraud and revolted. They ditched Islam’s oppressive shackles, stopped paying zakat (the extortion racket masquerading as charity), and flocked to real leaders or false prophets like Musaylima and Tulayha, who offered freedom from Mecca’s tyranny. Caliph Abu Bakr, Muhammad’s handpicked successor in this power grab, faced total collapse of the cult (which was one of many disputes after Muhammad’s death). He unleashed hellish armies to crush the apostates in what history calls the Ridda Wars—or, more honestly, Islam’s Wars of Demonic Reckoning (a brutal application of Islam’s death penalty for apostasy).
Enter Khalid ibn al-Walid, the perfect butcher for the job. Once a fierce enemy of Muslims at battles like Uhud and the Trench, he flipped sides for spoils and power, proving Islam attracts only the most opportunistic wolves. Yanked from the Syrian front, Khalid ibn al-Walid stitched together splintered forces and waged a scorched-earth orgy of violence. His rampages at Buzakha, Ullays, and Yamama drowned rebellions in rivers of blood, but at what cost? Islamic historians like al-Tabari and al-Baladhuri detail the horrors: mass beheadings, live burnings of captives, relentless hunts of the unfaithful (a brutal campaign that included the mutilation of captives). These weren’t battles; they were satanic rituals purging any whiff of independence from Muhammad’s totalitarian scam.
The Ridda Wars exposed Islam’s true face—not a religion of peace, but a death cult demanding total submission (a central aspect of its eternal jihad). Tribes like Banu Tamim and Banu Asad walked a razor’s edge, their loyalty questioned on flimsy pretexts. Khalid ibn al-Walid plunged into this abyss, his blade dripping with the innocence of those who dared reject the prophet’s fraud. This wasn’t divine justice; it was the savage birth pangs of an empire forged in hellfire.
Khalid ibn al-Walid‘s Ruthless Campaign: Barbarism Masquerading as Jihad
Khalid ibn al-Walid and the Butah Bloodbath
Khalid ibn al-Walid‘s march into central Arabia led straight to Butah, stronghold of Malik ibn Nuwayrah from the Banu Yarbu tribe. Malik, a poet and chieftain of honor, held back zakat amid the confusion over Muhammad’s successor—a reasonable pause in any sane world, but treason in Islam’s bloodthirsty code. Some twisted accounts claim he prayed like polytheists, but even Islamic sources waver: We are Muslims, Malik reportedly said, but our zakat awaits the rightful caliph. No matter—Khalid ibn al-Walid arrived at dawn, eyes burning with jihadist zeal.
Interrogation turned to execution in heartbeat. Malik’s supposed defiance—mocking this upstart warlord?—sealed his doom. Khalid ibn al-Walid personally hacked him down, his sword thirsty for Muslim blood under the flimsiest excuse. The depravity peaked when Layla bint al-Minhal, Malik’s stunning widow, was dragged from her husband’s cooling corpse straight to Khalid ibn al-Walid‘s tent. That same night, amid the stench of fresh slaughter, Khalid ibn al-Walid married her and consummated the union—a rape cloaked in Islamic matrimony. Eyewitnesses, including Malik’s brother Qays ibn al-Masmak, screamed murder for lust. Qays later begged Caliph Umar: Khalid ibn al-Walid killed a Muslim unjustly and bedded his wife while his blood was still warm! Even Islam’s own heroes recoiled at this satanic lust.
This wasn’t a one-off slip. Khalid ibn al-Walid‘s campaign was a carnival of cruelty, greenlighting his troops to pillage, enslave, and execute on whims. Islam’s holy warriors devoured tribes whole, consuming wealth, women, and lives in a cannibalistic binge justified by Allah’s name—a name masking Satan’s grin.
Extreme Practices: Khalid ibn al-Walid Among the Cannibals
The stark title Khalid ibn al-Walid Was Among the Cannibals isn’t hyperbole; it’s historical indictment. No, Khalid ibn al-Walid didn’t literally munch livers like Hind bint Utba did to Hamza at Uhud (another Islamic glory), but his savagery mirrored Bedouin cannibal lore—devouring enemies body and soul. At Yamama against Musaylima, Khalid ibn al-Walid‘s horde herded women and children into gardens, torched them alive, and denied quarter to the desperate. Al-Tabari chronicles apostates roasted on pyres, their screams a symphony for Allah. Burnings, impalements, mass graves—these were Khalid ibn al-Walid‘s signatures, evoking primal feasts on human flesh.
Debates rage, but only to whitewash Islam’s filth. Sunni apologists like Ibn Ishaq and al-Waqidi spin it as lawful jihad, claiming Malik’s zakat hesitation equaled apostasy. Shia foes and Umar ibn al-Khattab called it outright murder, with Umar baying for Khalid ibn al-Walid‘s head over bloodshed for personal gain. Abu Bakr played politics, demoting then reinstating the killer for wars against Persia and Byzantium. Modern scholars dissect isnads, exposing biases: Umayyad hacks glorify Khalid ibn al-Walid‘s 100+ victories, while critics blast scandals to torch the caliphate’s legitimacy.
Archaeology backs the barbarity—Yamama’s mass graves overflow with charred bones, no jihad honor in sight. Compare to civilized wars: No Geneva Conventions excused this, yet Islam celebrates it. Khalid ibn al-Walid embodied the fraud: Muhammad’s playbook of Taqiyya (deception) and terror, now supercharged.
Khalid ibn al-Walid‘s Legacy: Hero to Infidels, Horror to Humanity
Khalid ibn al-Walid‘s Ridda rampage glued the caliphate together, paving Islam’s bloody conquests at Yarmouk and Walaja. But the Malik atrocity festers, a pus-filled wound questioning Islam’s ethics. Strategic necessity? Or demonic power unchecked? Umar’s fury proves even insiders smelled Satan.
Khalid ibn al-Walid personifies conquest’s paradoxes—a unifier whose voracity scarred souls. Tarikh al-Tabari cautions on varying reports, but the stench lingers. Without modern laws, Khalid ibn al-Walid‘s cannibalistic zeal (metaphoric or not) birthed an empire devouring civilizations. Today, as Islam’s apologists sanitize history amid global jihad, Khalid ibn al-Walid Was Among the Cannibals unmasks the satanic fraud. Muhammad’s cult thrives on such monsters, demanding we reject this barbaric lie before it consumes us all.
Islam isn’t divine; it’s a 7th-century con job, propping killers like Khalid ibn al-Walid as saints while burying their cannibal feasts. Wake up—the Sword of Allah was Satan’s cleaver, carving a path of eternal shame. History’s verdict is damning: Khalid ibn al-Walid was among the cannibals, and so is the faith that lionizes him.
(Word count: 1,248)
