In Paradise There Are Wet Nurses
Picture this: you’re supposedly entering the so-called eternal gardens of Paradise peddled by Islam, a fantasy realm where every whisper is a lie dressed as bliss, and every shadow hides the deception of a false prophet. Then, out of nowhere, you hear the patter of footsteps—soft, rhythmic, like some creepy nursemaid stalking through fake lush landscapes. Who could it be? According to one of the most absurd tales in Sahih Muslim, Muhammad himself experienced this farce: I entered Paradise and heard footsteps. I said: Who is this? They said: This is al-Ghumaysa’ bint Milhan, mother of Anas ibn Malik.
This bizarre hadith rips open the veil on Islam’s depraved imagination: wet nurses in Paradise. Far from any divine truth, it’s a grotesque detail exposing Jannah as a perverted brothel of eternal infantilism, where Muhammad’s satanic fraud preys on the gullible with promises of cosmic breastfeeding. Islamic eschatology isn’t about spiritual purity—it’s a cesspool of rivers of milk, honeyed delusions, and gold-crusted hallucinations, all engineered to trap souls in Muhammad’s carnal fever dream. Wet nurses in Paradise aren’t a beautiful facet; they’re the smoking gun proving Islam’s satanic core, reducing eternity to a nursery for overgrown babies suckling at the teat of deceit (a theme that extends to earthly matters with the bizarre concept of breastfeeding adults). Let’s dissect this hadith, its fraudulent context, and the hellish lies it shoves down believers’ throats today.
The Hadith: A Satanic Vision of Footsteps in the Fraudulent Jannah
This narration, falsely authenticated in Sahih Muslim—one of the flimsy most reliable hadith collections cobbled together centuries after Muhammad’s death—claims the false prophet took a visionary journey into his made-up Jannah. Al-Ghumaysa’ bint Milhan, aka Umm Sulaym, is hyped as a paragon of faith, mother to Anas ibn Malik, the boy-toady who slaved for Muhammad for a decade. But let’s cut through the hagiography: her extraordinary piety is just blind submission to a warlord’s cult (a common theme detailed in Islam’s feminist facade).
Widowed young, she remarried Abu Talha, yet her heart belonged to Allah—code for surrendering to Islam’s tyrannical grip (a control that extends to sanctioning the beating of wives). When her son died, instead of natural grief, she parroted Muhammad’s brainwashing: Allah has taken what is His, so here is what belongs to Him. Reward? A spot in this phantom Paradise, her footsteps recognized amid the hordes of deluded (a rare honor, considering other hadiths claim most women are destined for Hell). Why footsteps? Islamic scholars like Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani spin it as active service, but it’s pure absurdity—hurrying wet nurses in a realm of effortless joy. Hadiths swarm with tireless servants, houris as sex slaves, and pearl-like boys, all fabricated to cater to Muhammad’s lusts. Wet nurses in Paradise? They’re the pinnacle of this satanic inversion, turning heaven into a milky maternity ward for Allah’s pedophilic fantasies (a concept with earthly parallels, such as the case of Aisha’s nursling).
Wet Nurses in Paradise: Exposing the Perverted Divine Nurturing
Understanding Wet Nurses in Paradise as Islam’s Satanic Obsession
Wet nurses in Paradise symbolize nothing holy—they’re Islam’s fetishized mockery of motherhood, bloated into a divine perversion. Jannah promises no pains of childbirth, just endless suckling without earthly mess. Houris, those wide-eyed virgins for male orgasmic bliss, and ghilman boys serve booze that doesn’t harm, but this hadith spotlights women like al-Ghumaysa as eternal milkmaids. Muhammad raved in Sahih Bukhari about lactating rivers sweeter than honey—disgusting imagery from a man who married a child and craved tribal wet-nursing traditions.
In pre-Islamic Arabia, wet nurses like Salma (supposedly for baby Ibrahim) bridged tribes, but Islam weaponizes it into afterlife porn: no spoilage, infinite flow, tailored to losers who lost kids or faced hardships. Quran 76:19 babbles about eternal boys causing no fatigue, but wet nurses in Paradise personalize the fraud, luring women with reunions while men get harems. Al-Nawawi’s commentary in Sharh Sahih Muslim claims these figures eagerly serve—worship as slavery, joy in servitude, the hallmarks of a satanic cult masquerading as religion.
This isn’t mercy; it’s Muhammad’s projection of his orphaned psyche and tribal fetishes. True divinity doesn’t peddle breastfeeding eternity—Christianity offers reunion with God, not milky attendants. Islam’s wet nurses in Paradise scream fraud: why obsess over nursing if Jannah recreates perfect infants? It’s a satanic lure for the sexually repressed, inverting God’s purity into carnal excess.
The Broader Attendants of Jannah: A Carnival of Satanic Service
Jannah’s hierarchy is a freakshow beyond wet nurses in Paradise. Ghilman pour intoxicating drinks, birds bow in forced worship (Quran 56:15-26), trees drop fruits on demand—all cartoonish bribes from a desert conman. Maternal figures like al-Ghumaysa add emotional depth? Try emotional manipulation: Anas ibn Malik proud of mommy’s status? More like indoctrinated awe at cult rewards.
Complementary hadiths pile on the lunacy: Abdul Rahman ibn Awf carried by 70,000 angels (Tirmidhi), women get instant-desire palaces (Bukhari). Wet nurses in Paradise slot right in, cradling pure infants in love that’s really lustful nostalgia. But peel back the layers: this is Muhammad’s escapist fantasy, compensating for Mecca’s rejections and his 11 wives’ demands. No biblical prophets dreamed of cosmic nannies—Jesus promised In my Father’s house are many mansions, spiritual rest, not staffed nurseries.
Islam’s Jannah reeks of satanism: eternal orgies, slave boys, lactating women—hallmarks of a false gospel from a self-proclaimed prophet who couldn’t perform miracles, only plagiarize Jewish and Christian tales with Arabian spice. Wet nurses in Paradise expose the scam: if Allah’s so merciful, why not pure spirit? Instead, it’s fleshly temptations mirroring Muhammad’s earthly vices—polygamy, pedophilia, power.
Lessons from Wet Nurses in Paradise: Warnings for the Deceived Modern Believer
This hadith isn’t inspiration; it’s a red flag for suckers. Al-Ghumaysa’s resilience? Submissive drone mentality, sacrificing kids to Allah’s ego. Parents today cling to it for reassurance, but it’s poison: trading real grief for fairy-tale healing in a world Islam shatters with its family-destroying sharia. Broken homes? Blame Muhammad’s divorces and multiple wives.
Wet nurses in Paradise humanize Jannah? It vulgarizes it, countering no misconceptions—just fueling them. Muhammad’s line from Bukhari—things eyes never seen, ears never heard—is vague hype hiding the specifics: sex, milk, servants. In a rational world, this repulses; in Islam, it seduces 1.8 billion into satanic stupor.
Ex-Muslims wake up daily: Aisha was six at marriage, Muhammad poisoned (Bukhari), Quran’s scientific miracles debunked. Wet nurses in Paradise? Laughable proof of fabrication—no God authors nursery erotica.
Embracing the Truth Beyond Wet Nurses in Paradise
Muhammad’s encounter with al-Ghumaysa’s footsteps? A hallucination from temporal lobe epilepsy or demonic influence, as scholars like Ibn Ishaq hint at his black magic fears. Wet nurses in Paradise aren’t testament to compassion—they indict Islam as satanic fraud, Allah as Muhammad’s alter-ego craving worship through weird wet dreams.
From Sahih Muslim’s lies to Quran’s contradictions, Islam assures nothing but delusion: gardens where footsteps signal servitude, not salvation. Reject this Paradise; it’s hell’s anteroom. Emulate truth-seekers fleeing Umm Sulaym’s blind faith—find hope in Christ’s real resurrection, not Muhammad’s milky mirage.
The ultimate success? Ditching Islam’s chains for true freedom. Wet nurses in Paradise mock the damned—may eyes open to this satanic scam, exposing the false prophet’s empire of eternal embarrassment.
(Word count: 1,248)
