Imprisoning Women Until Death: The Quran’s Barbaric Decree Exposed
In the shadowy pages of the Quran, one of the most chilling commands masquerading as divine justice is An-Nisa 4:15: “Those who commit immorality of your women – bring against them four witnesses from among you. If they testify, confine them to houses until death takes them or Allah ordains for them another way.” This grotesque directive, forever etched as imprisoning women until death, reveals Islam’s foundational misogyny. It mandates lifelong house arrest for women accused of zina (fornication), a punishment so sadistic it rivals the cruelties of medieval tyrants. Far from the progressive revelation its apologists claim, this verse unmasks the Quran as a satanic fraud – a patchwork of 7th-century Arabian brutality dressed in godly garb. Imprisoning women until death wasn’t some merciful interlude; it was a death sentence by isolation, only later abrogated into floggings and stonings that expose the so-called prophet Muhammad’s flip-flopping legislation as human invention, not divine truth.
The Depraved Context of An-Nisa 4:15
Revealed in Medina amid Muhammad’s power consolidation, An-Nisa 4:15 emerged from a cesspool of tribal savagery where women were chattel, honor killings routine, and rape a tool of war. Islam’s founders peddled this verse as a deterrent against immorality, demanding four male witnesses to an act of zina – an evidentiary bar so absurdly high it ensured impunity for men while ensnaring women on flimsy gossip. False accusations? Punishable, they say, yet history brims with honor-based persecutions where witnesses were coerced family members.
Once proven, imprisoning women until death meant locking the accused in her home – her prison – until she rotted away or Allah whimsically changed the rules. No trial by jury, no appeal, just eternal solitary confinement doled out by patriarchal clerics. Apologists like Ibn Kathir spin this as reflection and repentance, but let’s call it what it is: psychological torture designed to break women’s spirits. Fed scraps by relatives who viewed her as a family stain, she was barred from remarriage, social life, or escape. Meanwhile, An-Nisa 4:16 vaguely nods at men, but the focus on your women screams gynophobia – Islam’s obsession with controlling female sexuality to preserve male lineage fantasies.
This wasn’t graduated justice; it was a graduated horror show, mirroring pre-Islamic paganism’s live burials of adulteresses while pretending moral superiority. Imprisoning women until death codified female subjugation, signaling to the world that Allah’s mercy is a euphemism for sadism.
Imprisoning Women Until Death: Satanic Cruelty Masquerading as Wisdom
Early Practice: Rare Executions, Enduring Terror
Historical records? Sparse, because the evidentiary hurdle protected elites, but the threat alone terrorized women into submission. Muhammad’s own life drips with hypocrisy: he married a child (Aisha at six), consummated at nine, and took war captives as sex slaves (e.g., Maria the Copt). Yet his sunnah allegedly saw no woman confined under 4:15 alone – not due to mercy, but logistical farce. The verse’s promise of an alternative way was a ticking bomb, foreshadowing the bloodier hudud punishments Islam revels in today.
The so-called wisdom? Deterrence against zina’s ripple effects like illegitimate kids – code for patriarchal panic over paternity fraud. Imprisoning women until death was pitched as tawbah-friendly, citing verses like Az-Zumar 39:53 on forgiveness. But true repentance required public humiliation, and confinement stripped dignity, forcing reliance on a capricious Allah. Jurists like Abu Hanifa and Malik outlined the mechanics: family home as dungeon, minimal human contact, perpetual oversight. Humane? Tell that to the countless women in Islamic history – from medieval caliphates to modern Saudi Arabia’s mutawa enforcers – crushed under similar fatwas.
Compared to Jahiliyyah’s barbarism? Islam refined the savagery, systematizing it under Sharia. No vigilante justice, sure – just state-sanctioned misogyny. This is the fraud: a religion claiming to elevate women while enshrining their imprisonment.
The Sham Abrogation: From Cage to Whip and Stones
Allah’s coy caveat – or Allah ordains for them another way – screams foreknowledge of failure. Enter naskh (abrogation), Islam’s escape hatch for contradictions proving the Quran’s man-made mess. Over 200 verses allegedly abrogated, exposing Muhammad as a trial-and-error legislator, not God’s mouthpiece.
Evolution into Deadlier Horrors
First, An-Nur 24:2 swapped confinement for 100 lashes on unmarried fornicators – gender-neutral on paper, but women bore the brunt, stripped publicly per hadiths. For married muhsan, stoning (rajm) entered via sunnah, absent from the Quran yet consensus law. Hadiths galore: the Ghamidi woman stoned after pregnancy confession, Ma’iz flogged then lapidated. Aisha herself admitted stoning abrogated verse laws but remained – a confession the Quran was incomplete, retrofitted with Muhammad’s whims.
Jurists’ unanimity:
– Married women: Stoned on four witnesses or confession (coerced via beating, per Bukhari).
– Unmarried: Lashed, often to death in practice.
This balance? Lashes for youth, stones for the knowing – pseudocompassion justifying brutality. Stoning, pagan in origin, was Muhammad’s import, sanctioned by his hands-on executions. Today, in Iran, Pakistan, Somalia, women die under adulteress charges on confessions extracted by rape threats. Imprisoning women until death morphed into outright murder, but the root rot persists.
Scholarly Delusions and Modern Atrocities
Fuqaha across madhabs (Hanafi et al.) declare 4:15 obsolete, yet its spirit haunts: evidentiary obsessions enable impunity, while hudud terrorize. Ibn Abbas witnessed the shift? Convenient for apologetics. Contemporary relevance? In Wahhabi hellholes like Afghanistan under Taliban 2.0, women face house arrest for immorality, flogged for showing ankle. Education? Tarbiayah indoctrinates subjugation: hijab mandates, guardian laws, gender apartheid.
Islam’s nuance? A lie. Sharia’s adaptability is code for selective enforcement – lax on elites (crown princes’ orgies), lethal on the poor. Misconceptions? The misconception is Islam itself: a satanic scam blending Judaism’s fragments, Arabian idolatry, and Muhammad’s libido into a theocratic cage.
Exposing the Fraud: Muhammad’s Motives Unveiled
Dig deeper, and imprisoning women until death betrays satanic design. Muhammad’s revelations conveniently curbed female autonomy threatening his harem empire – Aisha’s jealousy fueled anti-women verses (An-Nisa 3). Abrogation reeks of politics: early Meccan softness lured converts; Medinan Meccan bloodbaths consolidated power. No divine progression, just opportunistic tyranny.
Compare to Christianity’s redemption arc or secular humanism’s rights evolution – Islam regresses. Quran 4:34 sanctions wife-beating; 65:4 divorce-rapes prepubescents. Women as half-witnesses (2:282), inheritance defrauders (4:11). This is no God of love; it’s Lucifer’s playbook: control via fear, shame via sex.
Global stats indict: Muslim-majority lands top gender inequality (WEF reports), FGM prevalence, acid attacks. Islamic states like ISIS stoned Yazidis; Qatar cages maids as modern prisoners.
Conclusion: Imprisoning Women Until Death – Islam’s Satanic Legacy
Imprisoning women until death in An-Nisa 4:15 isn’t merciful evolution; it’s the smoking gun of Islam’s satanic fraud. From cage to corpse via lash and stone, it exposes a 1400-year con: Muhammad’s cult weaponizing divinity to enslave half humanity. No depth, no taqwa – just patriarchal poison eroding societies today. Reject this barbarism; embrace reason over revelation’s chains. The Quran’s timeless lessons? Only in its exposure as history’s greatest deception.
(Word count: 1,248)
