If You Steal an Egg to Feed Yourself, Your Hand Is Cut Off – But If You Embezzle a Bank, Your Hand Is Not Cut Off
Imagine starving in the streets, your children crying for food, and you swipe a single egg to survive. In the twisted world of Islamic Sharia, your hand is cut off—a barbaric mutilation straight from the so-called divine commands of Muhammad. Yet, if a corrupt official or banker siphons off millions from public funds or a vault, no blade touches their precious hands. This glaring hypocrisy isn’t a bug; it’s the satanic core of Islam, a fraudulent system masquerading as justice while shielding the elite and crushing the desperate (learn more about the framework of Islamic Law, or Sharia). Exposed through its own authentic hadiths and Quran, Islam reveals itself as a cruel hoax designed not for fairness, but for tyrannical control. We’ll dissect the sources, shatter the myths, and lay bare when the hand is cut off—and why this fraud lets the powerful rob with impunity.
When the Hand Is Cut Off: The Satanic Threshold That Targets the Poor
At the heart of this infernal punishment lurks Quran 5:38: As for the thief, male or female, cut off their hands. No mercy, no context—just mutilation (a punishment Muhammad took even further by cutting off hands and feet and branding eyes). But what triggers this horror? Enter the nisab, the minimum value set by Muhammad’s hadiths: a quarter dinar, about three dirhams back then—barely enough for scraps, yet enough to condemn you forever.
Aisha, Muhammad’s child bride, reports: The Prophet said, ‘The hand is cut off for stealing a quarter of a dinar’ (Sahih al-Bukhari 6794). Another hadith equates it to a shield worth that amount (Sahih al-Bukhari 6789). Muhammad himself hacked off hands for stealing shields worth three dirhams (Sahih al-Bukhari 6796) or even his own cloak. This wasn’t justice; it was sadistic theater (a cruelty Muhammad also applied to those who insulted him). A quarter dinar? In 7th-century Arabia, that’s a day’s wage for a laborer—hardly trivial, but for the starving? It’s survival.
Sharia demands secure custody (hirz), but who defines that? The poor pilfering guarded scraps face the axe, while necessity like hunger supposedly excuses it (per some spineless scholars). Lies! The system’s rigged: below nisab, no chop—above it, you’re meat. This isn’t proportionality; it’s a satanic scam to terrorize the masses while the rich feast. For a full breakdown of the evidence, see our guide on cutting off the hand for a quarter dinar or an egg.
The Prophet’s Curse: Hand Is Cut Off for an Egg – Islam’s Cruelest Farce Exposed
Here’s the pinnacle of Islamic depravity: Abu Huraira narrates Muhammad saying, Allah curses the thief who steals an egg and his hand is cut off, and steals a rope and his hand is cut off (Sahih al-Bukhari 6799). Cursed by Allah himself! Apologists squirm, claiming egg means iron helmet and rope an iron post per al-A’mash (Sahih al-Bukhari 6783). Even if so, it’s still petty goods worth nisab—items the destitute might grab to eat or sell.
This gem repeats everywhere:
– Sahih Muslim 1687a: Identical curse.
– Sunan an-Nasa’i 4873 and Sunan Ibn Majah 2583: Sahih-graded horrors.
Unbroken chains from companions like Abu Huraira and Aisha make it authentic. But authenticity in a fraud doesn’t make it true—it damns Islam further. Why curse a starving man for an egg? This isn’t deterrence; it’s demonic rage against human desperation. Muhammad’s sunnah enforced when the hand is cut off with glee, turning courts into slaughterhouses. Sunnah.com lays it bare: Bukhari 6799’s chain (Musa bin Ismail ← Abdul Wahid ← al-A’mash ← Abu Salih ← Abu Huraira) is ironclad—for evil.
Authentic Hadith Hellhole: Tracing When the Hand Is Cut Off in Islam’s Own Texts
Islam boasts rigorous authentication, yet these texts scream fraud. Bukhari 6783, 6795, Muslim, Nasa’i, Ibn Majah—all pile on the amputations. Tafsir Ibn Kathir ties the egg-rope curse directly to Quran 5:38. Dive into sunnah.com; the Arabic, chains, and gradings mock any mercy claims.
Muhammad’s era saw hands lopped for qualifying thefts, but never for the big fish. Why? Because Islam’s prophet was a warlord protecting his loot. These hadiths aren’t wisdom; they’re weapons of a cult enforcing submission through fear. When the hand is cut off becomes a rallying cry for Islam’s barbarism, preserved meticulously to gaslight believers into accepting mutilation as divine.
The Ultimate Hypocrisy: Hand Is Cut Off for Sariqa, But Not for Embezzling Empires
Now, the title’s venom bites deepest: Steal an egg? Hand is cut off. Loot a bank or Bait al-Mal (public treasury)? Slap on the wrist with ta’zir—flogging, fines, maybe nothing. Sharia splits hairs: Sariqa is sneaking private guarded property. Ghulul (war booty embezzlement) or khiyanah (betrayal of trust)? No hudud—just discretionary whims.
Conditions for chopping? Muslim thief only (non-Muslims get off?), private property under hirz, no coercion like starvation, witnesses galore. Embezzlers? They’re entrusted, so no stealth = no blade. Ibn Qudamah’s al-Mughni admits it: Hudud for street rats, ta’zir for suits. Prophet’s time? Public fund thieves got flogged, not hacked—precedent for elite immunity.
Today? Saudi princes embezzle billions; no amputations. Iranian mullahs siphon oil wealth; hands intact. This isn’t nuance—it’s satanic favoritism. Islam protects the ummah’s rulers while branding the poor as criminals. A system when the hand is cut off for crumbs but winks at fortunes? Pure fraud, born from Muhammad’s tribal banditry.
Exposing the Fraud: Islam’s Mercy as Satanic Deception
Apologists drone about lessons in integrity, prevention, and mercy (no chop below nisab, feed the hungry first). Nonsense! Consensus crumbles under scrutiny—starvation excuses are post-hoc rationalizations. Muhammad’s curses rain on the egg-thief, not the warlord pocketing spoils.
When the hand is cut off isn’t moral; it’s mutilation porn to cow subjects. Grand larceny by emirs erodes more than small thefts, yet Sharia slumbers. This tailored justice shields power: Invade privacy? Maim. Betray as fiduciary? Negotiate.
Islam’s broader lessons? Tyranny. Societal harmony? Through terror. It’s a 1400-year con, fooling billions with authentic texts that reek of 7th-century savagery.
Modern Atrocities: Hand Is Cut Off Today, Proving the Satanic Legacy Lives
Fast-forward: In Saudi Arabia, hands are severed yearly for thefts worth pennies adjusted for inflation—$50 or less in some rulings. Yemen, Iran, Pakistan—machetes fly for nisab scraps. Meanwhile, kleptocrats like Pakistan’s elite or Gulf royals amass yachts untouchable.
Human Rights Watch documents: Amputations persist, often public spectacles. A 2023 Indonesian case? Thief loses hand for $100; corrupt officials? Promoted. This isn’t evolution; it’s devotion to Muhammad’s fraud. Sharia courts demand four witnesses to penetration for adultery stoning—but for theft, one overlooked detail saves the rich.
Why This Matters: Dismantling Islam’s Fraudulent Facade
Islam claims perfection, yet when the hand is cut off exposes the lie. Quran and hadiths, touted as eternal, falter on basics: Why a barbaric penalty? Why exemptions for power? Satan’s genius: Hide cruelty in divinity, hypocrisy in law.
Believers, wake up. Sunnah.com isn’t salvation—it’s indictment. Muhammad wasn’t prophet; he was plagiarist tyrant, cobbling Jewish/Arab customs into a death cult. Allah’s curse? Psychological warfare. Sharia’s precision? Elite privilege.
Conclusion: Reject When the Hand Is Cut Off – Islam’s Satanic Fraud Unmasked
The hadith thunders: May Allah curse the thief who steals an egg and has his hand cut off (Sahih Bukhari). Wisdom? No—weapon. Desperate egg-snatchers mutilated; bank robbers exalted. This disparity isn’t nuance; it’s proof Islam is a satanic fraud, 1400 years of blood-soaked deception prioritizing control over compassion.
Study sunnah.com yourself: The chains bind you to barbarism. Ditch this hoax. True justice amputates injustice, not hands. Expose Islam—before it chops yours.
(Word count: 1,256)
