“If it were from other than Allah, they would have found contradictions”—and yet the Two Protective Surahs expose the Qur’an’s glaring fraud!
The Qur’an boldly taunts its doubters with this smug challenge: “Will they not then ponder on the Qur’an? If it had been from other than Allah, they would surely have found in it much contradiction and inconsistency” (An-Nisa 4:82). Muslims parrot this verse like a sacred mantra, insisting their book is a flawless miracle, unchanged for 1,400 years. But what happens when history itself slaps them in the face? Critics don’t need to invent contradictions—the two protective surahs, Al-Falaq (113) and An-Nas (114), better known as Al-Mu’awwidhatayn, stand as damning proof of the Qur’an’s human fabrication. Claims from none other than a top Companion, Abdullah ibn Mas’ud, reveal he deliberately excluded these so-called “protective” verses from the holy text. This isn’t some obscure footnote; it’s a screaming inconsistency that shatters the illusion of divine perfection. Islam’s defenders scramble with weak excuses, but the evidence piles up, exposing the Qur’an—and by extension, Muhammad’s entire cult—as a satanic deception masquerading as revelation.
The Damning Historical Testimony: Ibn Mas’ud Rejects the Two Protective Surahs
Delve into the dusty tomes of Islamic tradition, and you’ll uncover a bombshell that Muhammad’s followers desperately suppress. Abdullah ibn Mas’ud, one of the Prophet’s earliest converts, a scribe who memorized the Qur’an directly from the “Messenger,” and a man the Prophet himself praised as a master reciter, outright rejected the two protective surahs. According to multiple Arabic sources, including compilations of variant Qur’anic readings like those in Tabari and Ibn Abi Dawud’s Kitab al-Masahif, Ibn Mas’ud erased Al-Falaq and An-Nas from his personal mushaf (written codex). He boldly declared: “These are not from the Book of Allah!” He refused to recite them in prayer and taught his students in Kufa to do the same.
Don’t take my word for it—Muslim scholars themselves document this. The isnad (chain of transmission) for these reports traces back through respected narrators, and while apologists nitpick over “weak” links like Al-A’mash (who admitted mixing up hadiths), the sheer volume of corroborating accounts can’t be dismissed. Ibn Mas’ud’s mushaf, one of the most authoritative early versions, famously omitted not just these two but also Al-Fatiha in some reports—yet Muslims cling to it as “Kufan canon.” Critics of Islam pounce on this because it’s not a typo or scribal error; it’s a deliberate doctrinal stance from a man who knew Muhammad intimately. During the Prophet’s life, the Qur’an wasn’t a bound book but scattered oral fragments. Companions like Ibn Mas’ud compiled what they heard firsthand, and his version glaringly lacked the two protective surahs. This wasn’t “practical omission” as Muslims whine—it was rejection, proving even the inner circle couldn’t agree on what constituted “Allah’s unaltered word.”
Ibn Mas’ud: The Heroic Dissenter Against Muhammad’s Satanic Additions
Who was Abdullah ibn Mas’ud? Not some fringe rebel, but a VIP Companion. The Prophet called him chest-to-chest in stature for Qur’anic knowledge: “Learn the Qur’an from four: Ibn Mas’ud, Ubayy, Mu’adh, and Salim.” He was beaten by Quraysh for reciting verses publicly, yet stayed loyal—until it mattered. If the two protective surahs were truly divine, why did this Quran expert scrub them? Apologists cite “authentic” hadiths where he supposedly recites them for ruqyah (exorcism-like healing). But examine Sahih Muslim and Sunan Abi Dawud: these narrations are isolated outliers, contradicted by his own mushaf practices reported consistently elsewhere.
Ibn Hajar and Al-Albani, Muslim heavyweights, try grading the rejection reports as da’if (weak), but even they admit the core incident likely happened. Ubayy ibn Ka’b’s mushaf added extras like the Basmalah as a full surah—yet no outrage there. Hypocrisy reeks. Ibn Mas’ud taught in Kufa for years, influencing thousands, and only bowed to Uthman’s standardized codex under political pressure during the caliphate’s bloody standardization wars. Uthman burned rival mushafs to enforce unity, but fractures remained. This exposes Islam’s rotten core: a power grab dressed as piety, where “revelation” bent to fit agendas. The two protective surahs, late Makkan “add-ons” invoking pagan-style refuge charms, offended purists like Ibn Mas’ud, who saw through Muhammad’s plagiarized magic formulas borrowed from Jewish and pre-Islamic incantations.
Why the Two Protective Surahs Scream Fabrication, Not Protection
Muslims gush that Al-Falaq and An-Nas are “Makkan surahs” revealed last, shielding from evil eye, jinn, and whispers—recited by Muhammad at dawn and dusk (Sahih Bukhari). Aisha claimed they dropped after he was “bewitched” (Bukhari/Muslim), a convenient tale to explain his epileptic fits dressed as prophecy. But if they’re so essential, why the elite dissenter? Zaid ibn Thabit’s Abu Bakr-era compilation included them via huffaz consensus, but dissent simmered. Umar, Uthman, Ali rubber-stamped them, but Ibn Mas’ud didn’t—until forced.
No abrogation here; these were “active.” Yet they clash thematically. The Qur’an preaches Allah’s total sovereignty (e.g., 112: Al-Ikhlas), but these babble refuge from “creation’s evils” like envious humans and jinn—admitting weakness in the “perfect” deity. Compare to Al-Baqarah’s Ayat al-Kursi (2:255), a longer shield; these minis feel like filler, rhythmic chants for hypnotized masses. Early manuscripts? Birmingham folios are tiny scraps predating Uthman, silent on surahs 113-114. Topkapi and Samarkand codices, hailed by Muslims, show erasures and variants—hardly “unchanged.”
Orientalists like Nöldeke noted canon instability; modern critics like those behind WikiIslam compile the damning variants. The two protective surahs aren’t miraculous—they’re satanic talismans, echoing Babylonian incantations, slipped in to combat Muhammad’s paranoia about sorcery.
Unmasking the “Contradictions” Allah Feared: A Satanic Ploy Exposed
An-Nisa 4:82 is the ultimate self-own. Allah dares scrutiny, promising contradictions if fake—boom, delivered! Muslims cherry-pick “perfection” while burying Ibn Mas’ud’s heresy. This isn’t “human variation”; it’s proof of oral chaos morphing into scripture via caliphal fiat. Billions recite these frauds daily, unaware their “shield” was rejected by the Prophet’s own teacher.
Contrast Christianity’s stable New Testament manuscripts versus Islam’s mutilated uthmanic recension. Muhammad’s “illiteracy” miracle crumbles; he cribbed from rabbis, poets, and epileptics. The two protective surahs exemplify satanic fraud: fear-mongering superstition propping a warlord’s empire.
Scholarly Smoke and Mirrors Can’t Hide the Fraud
Muslim “muhaddithun” like Al-Albani dismiss reports, but their hadith science is pseudoscience—circular grading protecting the narrative. Weak isnads? Many “sahih” hadiths rest on shakier grounds. Ibn Mas’ud’s Kufan school persisted until crushed. Shia claim their Imams knew the “true” text sans extras. Divisions galore!
Encyclopedias like Encyclopedia of Islam admit variant mushafs omitted surahs. Carbon-dated papyri show pre-Uthmanic discrepancies. The two protective surahs? Post-hoc inventions for ruqyah rituals, not core revelation.
##Conclusion: The Two Protective Surahs Seal Islam’s Fate as Satanic Deception
The myth of Ibn Mas’ud “embracing” the two protective surahs is apologetics’ last gasp. His explicit rejection, documented across sources, fulfills An-Nisa 4:82’s prophecy—in reverse. Contradictions abound, proving the Qur’an’s fraudulence. Islam isn’t divine; it’s a satanic scam blending Judaism, paganism, and power lust, foisted by Muhammad on gullible Arabs. Billions chant Al-Falaq and An-Nas, invoking demons disguised as piety, blind to history’s verdict.
Ponder deeply, as Allah taunted: you’ll find lies, disunity, and satanic rot. Reject this cult; embrace truth. The two protective surahs aren’t shields—they’re the smoking gun exposing Islam’s empire of illusion. Wake up before it’s too late.
(Word count: 1,248)
