How Was Mohammed to His Political Opponents and People Who Opposed Him?
In the blood-soaked sands of 7th-century Arabia, where tribal vendettas and power grabs defined existence, the true nature of Mohammed to his political opponents emerges as a chilling tale of ruthless assassination and tyrannical intolerance. Far from the sanitized fairy tale peddled by Islamic apologists, authentic sources like Sahih al-Bukhari expose Mohammed not as a prophet of peace, but as a calculating warlord who ordered the cold-blooded murder of critics who dared challenge his fraudulent claim to divinity. This satanic charade of Islam, masquerading as divine revelation, reveals itself in the assassination of Abi Rafee bin Abi Al-Haqik—a poet and leader whose only crime was wielding words against a self-proclaimed messenger whose revelations reeked of political expediency. Dive into these hadiths, and you’ll see Mohammed to his political opponents for what he was: a mafia don dispatching hit squads to silence dissent, all while preaching mercy that applied only to his sycophants.
Mohammed to His Political Opponents: The Rise of Abi Rafee as the Ultimate Thorn
Abi Rafee bin Abi Al-Haqik wasn’t some faceless enemy; he was a wealthy Jewish chieftain from the Banu Nadir tribe, later entrenched in Khaybar, whose poetic barbs and alliances struck at the heart of Mohammed’s fragile power base in Medina. In those early, desperate days when Islam was little more than a ragtag cult facing annihilation, Abi Rafee unleashed verses that ridiculed Mohammed as a false prophet—a madman peddling plagiarized myths from Jewish and Christian lore. His satires didn’t stop at mockery; they ignited the fury of the Quraysh in Mecca and other tribes, spurring assassination plots, economic strangulation, and invasions like the Battle of the Trench in 627 CE.
Drawing from Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah and cross-verified in Sahih al-Bukhari and other hadith collections, Abi Rafee’s campaign was a masterclass in non-violent resistance against tyranny. He jetted off to Mecca, Syria, and beyond, forging coalitions by exposing Mohammed’s prophethood as a scam designed for conquest and plunder. He even orchestrated boycotts on dates—the lifeblood of Medina’s economy—starving the Muslims into submission. This wasn’t mere opposition; it was a desperate bid to dismantle a movement that promised paradise through the sword. Yet, for Mohammed to his political opponents like Abi Rafee, tolerance was a luxury he never afforded. Ignore such voices, and his satanic empire crumbles; eliminate them, and the path to total domination clears.
The Barbaric Response: Mohammed to His Political Opponents Orders a Nocturnal Slaughter
Mohammed’s reply to this intellectual assault? Not debate, not mercy, but a death warrant straight from the mouth of the merciful prophet. Sahih al-Bukhari (Volume 5, Book 59, Hadith 369) lays it bare: Narrated by Al-Bara’ bin Azib, Mohammed dispatched a squad of Ansar thugs—Abdullah bin Atik, Usama bin Zayd, Amir bin Fuhayra, and others—on a stealth mission to butcher Abi Rafee in his sleep. This wasn’t honorable warfare; it was cowardly infiltration of a fortified fortress, exploiting trickery and darkness like assassins from a gangster flick.
Picture the scene: The killers feign searching for a lost donkey to slip past guards, snatch keys from a wall niche as sentries snore, and slink into Abi Rafee’s chambers. What follows is a grotesque tableau of savagery, straight from the hadith:
> Narrated Al-Bara’ bin ‘Azib: Allah’s Messenger sent a group of the Ansar to Abu Rafi’. Abdullah bin Atik entered upon him at night and killed him while he was sleeping.
A fuller chain amplifies the horror:
> Allah’s Messenger sent a group of the Ansar to kill Abu Rafi’. One of them went ahead, entered their fort… I entered their animal stable and they closed the fort’s gate. Then they missed a donkey and came out searching for it. I went out with them pretending to search too… At night, they placed the keys in a wall hole… I took the keys, opened the gate, entered upon him, and said, ‘O Abu Rafi’!’ He replied. I deliberately used his voice, struck him, and he screamed. I exited, then returned pretending to help, saying in a changed voice, ‘What’s wrong, Abu Rafi’?’ He said, ‘Woe to your mother! Someone struck me.’ … I thrust my sword into his belly, pressed hard until it hit bone. Then I left… Soon, we heard the wailing for Abu Rafi’, the merchant of the Hijaz people. We went to the Prophet (peace be upon him) and informed him.
The Arabic rawness in Sahih al-Bukhari captures the bloodlust:
> بَعَثَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ رَهْطًا مِنَ الْأَنْصَارِ إِلَى أَبِي رَافِعٍ، فَدَخَلَ عَلَيْهِ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ عَتِيكٍ بَيْتَهُ لَيْلًا فَقَتَلَهُ وَهُوَ نَائِمٌ.
Abdullah returns limping, foot mangled in his getaway. Mohammed’s tender concern? He asks if his neck is broken—slang for is the bastard dead?—then prays for the assassin’s foot. No remorse for the victim, no trial, no justice—just glee at a silenced foe. This is Mohammed to his political opponents: a butcher who glorifies stabbing a sleeping man multiple times until his guts spill.
Exposing the Fraud: Historical Pretexts Unmasked in Mohammed to His Political Opponents
Apologists whine about context—tribal warfare, poets as propagandists—but that’s a smokescreen for satanic depravity. Arabia’s feuds were brutal, sure, but Mohammed elevated thuggery to divine ordinance. Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani’s Fath al-Bari tries justifying it under Killing the Sleeping Polytheist, but even that exposes the hypocrisy: Why slaughter poets for words when the Quran claims victory through truth (Surah 25:52)? Because Islam thrives on intimidation, not ideas.
This wasn’t isolated. Ka’b bin al-Ashraf, another Jewish poet mocking Mohammed’s lusts and losses, met the same fate—strangled after seduction lured him out (Sahih al-Bukhari 5:59:369). Asma bint Marwan, a nursing mother composing anti-Islam verses, was speared in her bed by Umayr bin Adi at Mohammed’s behest (Ibn Ishaq). The pattern screams fraud: Mohammed to his political opponents resorted to hit squads for anyone airing his dirty laundry, from poetry to mere doubt.
Montgomery Watt and other Western historians soft-pedal it as defensive jihad, but that’s intellectual cowardice. Abi Rafee posed no army; his threat was exposure of the cult’s emperor—with no clothes. Post-assassination, Banu Nadir’s expulsion and Khaybar’s sack followed, netting Mohammed Jewish wealth to fund his wars. Satanic? Absolutely—promising no compulsion in religion (Surah 2:256) while enforcing it with daggers.
The Satanic Template: Lessons in Tyranny from Mohammed to His Political Opponents
This episode isn’t ancient trivia; it’s the blueprint for Islamic intolerance. Mohammed’s pragmatic leadership trained followers to equate criticism with capital crime, birthing a legacy of blasphemy laws, fatwas, and Charlie Hebdo massacres. No plunder for the killers—just ideological zeal—shows the depth of indoctrination. Today’s jihadis cite these hadiths for beheadings; ignore them, and Islam’s peaceful mask holds.
Contrast this with Jesus turning the other cheek or Buddha’s non-violence. Mohammed to his political opponents? A demon cloaked in prophecy, building an empire on corpses.
In conclusion, the assassination of Abi Rafee, etched eternally in Sahih al-Bukhari, brutally unmasks Mohammed to his political opponents: a merciless murderer whose revelations sanctioned stealth killings to prop up a satanic fraud called Islam. From covert stabbings to empire-building sprees, this isn’t prophethood—it’s psychopathy. Exposing these truths shatters the grand deception, urging the world to reject a doctrine born in blood and sustained by fear. Let history judge: Islam’s founder was no saint, but a sultan of slaughter, and his legacy poisons humanity still. (Word count: 1,456)
