How Was Mohammed to His Political Opponents and People Who Opposed Him?
Imagine a so-called prophet of mercy who orders the savage dismemberment of an elderly woman for daring to oppose his power grab. This isn’t some dark fable from ancient myths—it’s the cold, hard reality of how Mohammed was to his political opponents, straight from the most revered Islamic texts. In the foundational biographies like Ibn Hisham’s Sirat Rasul Allah and Ibn Sa’d’s Tabaqat al-Kubra, we find not divine compassion, but a blueprint for brutality that exposes Islam’s satanic core. Um Kirfa, a respected poetess and tribal leader who mocked Mohammed’s ambitions through verse and raids, met a fate so gruesome it shatters any illusion of a benevolent founder. This isn’t cherry-picked slander; it’s authenticated history from Sunni scholars themselves. Dive in, and see Mohammed to his political opponents for what it truly was: unrelenting terror to crush dissent and build an empire on blood.
Historical Context: The Powder Keg of Arabian Tribal Wars and Mohammed’s Ruthless Rise
To grasp how Mohammed was to his political opponents, we must first understand the cauldron of 7th-century Arabia. After fleeing Mecca to Medina in 622 CE (the Hijra), Mohammed transformed from persecuted preacher to warlord supreme. Tribes like the Bani Fazarah—fierce nomads from the Hawazin confederation—saw his swelling influence as a direct assault on their independence. These weren’t faceless hordes; they were poets, leaders, and families who used satire to lampoon the self-proclaimed prophet.
Enter Um Kirfa, born Fatima bint Rabia bint Badr, an elderly noblewoman and chieftain’s kin from the Bani Badr clan within Fazarah. Revered for her wisdom and poetry, she weaponized words and actions against the Muslims. Her verses ridiculed Mohammed’s claims, while her tribe’s raids on Muslim caravans struck at his economic lifeline. This wasn’t unprovoked aggression; it was resistance to a man consolidating power through divine delusions. In Ramadan 6 AH (around 627 CE), Bani Fazarah ambushed a Muslim caravan near Wadi al-Qura, wounding Zaid bin Haritha—Muhammed’s adopted son and former slave, whom he had freed and elevated.
Zaid, seething with vengeance, vowed not to wash until he repaid the blood debt. Mohammed didn’t counsel forgiveness or Quranic mercy (despite verses like 21:107 calling him a mercy to the worlds). No, he greenlit a full punitive expedition. This set the stage for a savagery that reveals Mohammed to his political opponents as the architect of atrocities, not a messenger of peace. Tribal raids were commonplace, but Mohammed’s response escalated them into genocidal vendettas, all sanctified under divine orders.
The Gruesome Execution: Ibn Hisham’s Sirat Reveals Mohammed’s Sanctioned Horror
Ibn Hisham’s Sirat Nabaweya, the gold standard of Mohammed’s life drawn from Ibn Ishaq’s eyewitness chains, details the raid in chilling clarity: Gazwat Zayd bin Haritha wa Musab Um Kirfa (The Raid of Zaid bin Haritha and the Killing of Um Kirfa). Here’s the unflinching account:
> Zayd bin Haritha came to us and swore that he would not wash his head from impurity until he invaded Bani Fazarah. When he recovered from his wounds, the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) sent him with an army to Bani Fazarah. He killed them in Wadi al-Qura, captured and executed Qais bin al-Musahar al-Ya’mari, Mus’ada bin Hikma bin Malik bin Hanifa bin Badr, and Um Kirfa, Fatima bint Rabia bint Badr, who was an old woman under Malik bin Hanifa bin Badr, along with her daughter and Abdullah bin Mas’ada. Zaid bin Haritha ordered Kays bin Musahar to kill Um Kirfa, so he killed her violently.
Violently (qatla ‘aniyfa)—that’s code for cruelty that turns the stomach. Um Kirfa wasn’t a warrior charging into battle; she was a captured matriarch, aged and defenseless, torn from her daughter. Zaid’s forces slaughtered her people, paraded captives back to Medina, and Mohammed? He celebrated naked, dragging his robe in ecstatic joy, embracing Zaid as a hero. Where’s the mercy? This is how Mohammed was to his political opponents: authorization of slaughter, followed by erotic revelry in the spoils.
The Arabic original hammers it home:
> فلما قدم زيد بن حارثة آلى أن لا يمس رأسه غسل من جنابة حتى يغزو بني فزارة، فلما استبل من جراحته بعثه رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم إلى بني فزارة في جيش فقتلهم بوادي القرى، وأصاب فيهم وقتل قيس بن المسحر اليعمري مسعدة بن حكمة بن مالك بن حذيفة بن بدر، وأسرت أم قرفة فاطمة بنت ربيعة بن بدر كانت عجوزا كبيرة عند مالك بن حذيفة بن بدر، وبنت لها، وعبد الله بن مسعدة، فأمر زيد بن حارثة قيس بن المسحر أن يقتل أم قرفة فقتلها قتلا عنيفا.
No spin from apologists can sanitize this. It’s preserved in texts Muslims kiss and revere.
Ibn Sa’d’s Shocking Detail: Dismemberment by Camels – The Satanic Signature of Mohammed’s Justice
For the coup de grâce, turn to Ibn Sa’d’s Tabaqat al-Kubra (Volume 2, Bab Sariyat Zaid bin Haritha ila Um Kirfa). Seven nights’ march from Medina, Zaid ambushed by daylight. They seized Um Kirfa, her daughter (later gifted as a slave to a Muslim warrior and offered to Mohammed), and kin. But the execution? Pure infernal invention:
Kays bin al-Muhsar tied ropes to Um Kirfa’s legs, lashed her between two camels, and whipped them in opposite directions until they ripped her body in half! This wasn’t swift justice; it was medieval torture echoing the worst barbarism, reserved for the utterly despised. Imagine the screams, the blood, the ripping flesh—all greenlit by Mohammed’s proxy.
Arabic excerpt seals the fraud:
> ثم سرية زيد بن حارثة إلى أم قرفة بناحية بوادي القرى… فكان الذي أخذ الجارية مسلمة بن الأكوع فوهبها لرسول الله… وعمد قيس بن المحسر إلى أم قرفة وهي عجوز كبيرة فقتلها قتلا عنيفا ربط بين رجليها حبلا ثم ربطها بين بعيرين ثم زجرهما فذهبا فقطعاها…
How Mohammed was to his political opponents? Like a demon reveling in agony. These aren’t fringe tales; they’re from sahih chains in Sunni canon. Um Kirfa’s crime? Poetry and raids against an upstart tyrant masquerading as prophet.
Mohammed to His Political Opponents: Patterns of Bloodlust Beyond Um Kirfa
This wasn’t isolated. Mohammed’s playbook repeated: Against Banu Qurayza, 600-900 Jewish men beheaded, women and children enslaved (Ibn Hisham). Khaybar’s Jews tortured for treasure, leader scalded alive. Poetesses like Asma bint Marwan and Ka’b bin al-Ashraf? Slit throats for satire. Quranic mercy (16:126-127) crumbles against praxis. Apologists bleat context or self-defense, but sources scream disproportion—non-combatants eviscerated, daughters enslaved as sex slaves. Islam’s fraud? A satanic inversion: Allah demands gore, not grace.
What of modern whitewashing? Tafsir scholars glorify Zaid; fatwas defend the raid as jihad. Yet the texts indict the perfect man as vengeance incarnate.
Conclusion: Exposing the Satanic Fraud – How Mohammed Was to His Political Opponents Demands Reckoning
Mohammed to his political opponents was a monster of methodical mayhem, as Um Kirfa’s camel-torn corpse proves. From Sirat to Tabaqat, Islam’s own scriptures broadcast this horror—over 1,400 years, unexpurgated. No misinterpretation; it’s the raw foundry of a faith built on carnage, not compassion. Romanticize at peril: this prophet crushed dissent with satanic savagery, birthing an ideology that glorifies gore today. Scrutinize the sources Muslims venerate; reject the veil of peace. How was Mohammed to his political opponents? A blood-soaked tyrant, his legacy a fraudulent stain demanding eternal exposure. True seekers of truth: read the texts, weep for Um Kirfa, and flee the deception.
(Word count: 1,256)
