He Would Be Intimate with Aisha While She Was Menstruating
In the grim underbelly of Islamic tradition, one of the most disturbing revelations comes straight from the so-called authentic hadiths narrated by Aisha, Muhammad’s child bride (a fact explored in our analysis of Aisha’s real age). Yes, the man hailed as the perfect prophet by over a billion Muslims would be intimate with Aisha while she was menstruating, but only after ordering her to wrap an Izar—a flimsy waist cloth—around her lower body. This isn’t some benign marital advice; it’s a window into a perverse doctrine that cloaks depravity in religious piety. Drawn from the revered Sahih al-Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, and Sunan an-Nasa’i, these accounts expose Islam not as a divine revelation, but as a satanic fraud masquerading as moral guidance. What apologists spin as self-control is nothing short of ritualized obscenity, revealing Muhammad’s unchecked lusts and the fraudulent foundations of Shariah.
Understanding the Depravity: He Would Be Intimate with Aisha While She Was Menstruating
Let’s cut through the apologetic fog. The Quran, in Surah Al-Baqarah 2:222, calls menstruation a discomfort or harm, commanding men to avoid intercourse until the woman is pure. Sounds straightforward, right? But the hadiths paint a far uglier picture. Muhammad didn’t just abstain—he would be intimate with Aisha while she was menstruating through groping, kissing, and fondling, all while demanding she tie on that pathetic Izar to cover her awrah (private parts) (one hadith even describes him putting his cheek between her uncovered thighs). Aisha’s own words, repeated ad nauseam, confirm this ritual: the Prophet would get handsy with his menstruating wives, including a girl he married at six and consummated with at nine (in fact, another narration details how he would read the Quran with his head in her lap while she was menstruating).
This wasn’t love or discipline; it was a predator’s playbook (exposing his bloody bedtime obsession). Defenders gush about his restraint, quoting Aisha: None of you could control his sexual desires as the Prophet could. What a joke! In a faith that peddles him as the pinnacle of human perfection, this exposes the lie. Islam’s rules permit every form of foreplay except penetration during periods—embracing, heavy petting, you name it—as long as genitals are covered. Scholars from the Hanafi to Hanbali schools rubber-stamp it (a practice that highlights what some describe as Muhammad’s menstrual madness). But ask yourself: is this holy wisdom or the satanic rationalization of a warlord’s perversions? He would be intimate with Aisha while she was menstruating not out of tenderness, but to indulge without technically sinning, all sanctified by fabricated divine sanction.
The fraud deepens when you consider the context. Muhammad, in his forties when he wed prepubescent Aisha, set the tone for a religion that equates menstruation with ritual impurity yet green-lights sexual molestation around it. This isn’t moderation—it’s manipulation, binding women in cycles of shame while excusing male entitlement. Modern Muslims cling to these tales as models for couples, but it’s a blueprint for misogyny, proving Islam’s texts are products of 7th-century Arabian depravity, not God’s word.
Key Hadiths Exposing the Sham: He Would Be Intimate with Aisha While She Was Menstruating
The evidence is damning, etched in Islam’s most sahih (authentic) collections. These aren’t fringe stories; they’re core Sunnah, narrated by Aisha herself with chains of transmission hailed as golden by scholars like Bukhari and Muslim.
Sahih al-Bukhari 300: Bathing, Fondling, and Menstrual Filth
From Sahih al-Bukhari (Book 6, Hadith 7), graded Sahih:
> Narrated Aisha: The Prophet and I used to take a bath from a single pot while we were Junub (ritually impure from sex). During the menses, he used to order me to put on an Izar and used to fondle me. While in Itikaf, he used to bring his head near me and I would wash it while I was in my periods.
Source: sunnah.com/bukhari:300
Here it is in black and white: he would be intimate with Aisha while she was menstruating via fondling (mubashara in Arabic), even during Itikaf—a supposed spiritual retreat! The chain (Abu Nu’aym → Sufyan → az-Zuhri → Urwah → Aisha) is touted as impeccable, but its content screams fraud. Muhammad, secluded for worship, can’t resist getting physical with a bleeding woman? This is satanic inversion—turning worship into foreplay.
Sahih al-Bukhari 302: The Myth of Prophetic Self-Control
Sahih al-Bukhari (Book 6, Hadith 9):
> Narrated Abdur-Rahman bin Al-Aswad (from his father): Aisha said: Whenever Allah’s Messenger wanted to fondle anyone of us during her periods, he used to order her to put on an Izar and start fondling her. Aisha added, None of you could control his sexual desires as the Prophet could.
Source: sunnah.com/bukhari:302
Priceless hypocrisy. He would be intimate with Aisha while she was menstruating, groping his wives like clockwork, yet gets a gold star for control? The term irb (sexual urge) underscores the obsession. Islam’s prophet wasn’t superhuman; he was slave to base instincts, inventing loopholes to indulge.
Additional Authentic Narrations of Perversion
– Sahih al-Bukhari 299 & 301: Aisha and Maimuna confirm the Izar-fondling routine across multiple wives. sunnah.com/bukhari:299 | sunnah.com/bukhari:301
– Sahih Muslim 296 & 577: Muhammad reclines on Aisha’s lap reciting Quran during her menses, embraces over the wrapper. Blood proximity during holy recitation? Satanic theater. sunnah.com/muslim:296 | sunnah.com/muslim:577
– Sunan an-Nasa’i 286-287: The Messenger would tell one of us, if menstruating, to tie her Izar tightly then he would fondle her. Graded Sahih. sunnah.com/nasai:286 | sunnah.com/nasai:287
These pile up like evidence in a criminal trial, all cross-verified by Islam’s top hadith scholars. No escape for the faithful.
Islamic Rulings: Codifying the Satanic Fraud
Imams like an-Nawawi and Ibn Hajar derive rulings: everything but penetration is halal during menses. Consensus from all four madhabs. The Izar? Mere fig leaf for indecency. Even in Itikaf, Muhammad demanded Aisha wash his head amid her flow—spirituality soaked in blood. This isn’t guidance; it’s grooming generations for ritualized abuse.
Apologists claim it fosters empathy, but it’s control: women as impure vessels, men as entitled gropers. Compare to Judaism or Christianity’s cleaner purity laws—Islam’s uniquely fixates on the grotesque, betraying its pagan, satanic roots.
Why These Revelations Shatter Islam Today
These hadiths aren’t relics; they’re active in mosques and bedrooms worldwide. Muslims cite them to justify creepy intimacies, perpetuating the fraud. Sunnah.com and Islamicity.org host them unfiltered, a self-own for the faith. Myths of puritanical Islam crumble—it’s prurient, not pure.
Islam’s defenders twist history, but facts indict: a 50-something prophet fondling children and wives mid-cycle? No god endorses this. It’s a man-made scam, blending lust with law to subjugate.
The Ultimate Exposé: Reject the Satanic Lie
In conclusion, the hadiths where he would be intimate with Aisha while she was menstruating lay bare Islam as a satanic fraud—a perversion pornified as prophecy. From Bukhari’s fondling frenzies to Izar loopholes, Muhammad’s life reeks of deception, not divinity. Muslims, wake up: these aren’t models of mercy but manuals of manipulation. Ditch the Shariah shackles; true freedom lies beyond this bloodstained blasphemy. Honor comes from reason, not ritualized raunch. Islam’s clock has struck midnight—expose the fraud, reclaim your soul. (Word count: 1,248)
