He Wanted to Kill Him Without Reason
Unveiling the Dark Hadith That Exposes Islam’s Satanic Core
In the shadowy annals of Islamic tradition, one hadith stands out like a festering wound on the facade of piety: he wanted to kill him without reason. Narrated by Anas ibn Malik, a so-called close companion of Muhammad, this chilling episode from early Islam reveals not divine wisdom, but a blueprint for fanatic violence disguised as spiritual discernment. Preserved in dubious sources like Hilyat al-Awliya (2/317), Al-Isabah (1/484), and Tarikh Ibn Kathir (7/298), it paints Muhammad not as a mercy to mankind, but as a man quick to incite murder over perceived slights. What begins as awe for a devout worshiper spirals into a prophetic death warrant, shattering any illusion of Islam’s moral superiority. This isn’t just a story—it’s damning evidence of Islam’s satanic fraud, where outward rituals mask murderous arrogance. Dive with me into this nightmare, and see how he wanted to kill him without reason lays bare the religion’s rotten heart.
The Hypocrite Who Fooled the Faithful
Picture Medina, the supposed cradle of Islamic virtue, buzzing with self-congratulatory worshippers measuring faith by the length of their prostrations. Anas ibn Malik gushes: During the time of the Messenger of Allah, there was a man whose worship impressed us. This mystery man, unnamed and rightly forgotten, dazzled the companions with his displays of devotion—endless prayers, fervent rituals that screamed piety to the gullible masses. In a community obsessed with appearances, he was the golden boy, the exemplar everyone envied and emulated.
The companions, starstruck, couldn’t wait to parade him before Muhammad. During a gathering, they raved about this paragon of faith. But Muhammad, feigning ignorance, played coy: We mentioned this to the Messenger of Allah, but he didn’t recognize him. Then, like a bad plot twist in a cheap thriller, the man strolls in. This is he, O Messenger of Allah! they exclaim, pointing like kids at a circus freak.
Muhammad’s reaction? No praise, no blessings—just a venomous glare. You are telling me about a man whose face has the mark of Satan on it. Boom. From hero to devil-marked in seconds. No trial, no evidence beyond a prophetic hunch. This is Islam’s justice: superficial judgment branding a man satanic because he doesn’t fit the founder’s vibe. How convenient for a cult leader consolidating power. The companions’ admiration crumbles, exposing their own blind idolatry. This unnamed fool becomes the scapegoat, his piety revealed as the thinnest veil over pride—the very sin that birthed Satan himself.
He Wanted to Kill Him Without Reason: Muhammad’s Bloodthirsty Decree
The plot thickens into outright horror. The man approaches but skips the obligatory As-salamu alaikum, a red flag of inner contempt in Islam’s petty etiquette. Muhammad doesn’t miss a beat: I ask you by Allah, did you say when you arrived at this gathering: There is no one in this group better or more virtuous than me? The man’s fatal mistake? Honesty. Yes, he admits flatly.
Pride—kibr, in Arabic—equals Satan’s rebellion. But instead of a sermon on humility, Muhammad unleashes hell: Who will kill this man? He wanted to kill him without reason, right there in the mosque, the so-called house of peace. Abu Bakr al-Siddiq, the future caliph and professional yes-man, jumps up: I will. He charges in, finds the guy prostrating in prayer, and hesitates: Glory be to Allah! Shall I kill a man who is praying?
The hadith cuts off abruptly, leaving the gory details to imagination. Did Abu Bakr slit his throat mid-sujud? Did Umar, the butcher of Banu Qurayza, finish the job? The sources dodge the outcome, but the command stands unchallenged—a green light for murdering a praying man over wounded ego. This isn’t mercy; it’s mob justice sanctioned by Allah’s messenger. In any sane moral system, this is premeditated murder. In Islam? Prophetic perfection. He wanted to kill him without reason isn’t hyperbole—it’s the unfiltered truth of a doctrine that elevates assassination above sanctity.
The Satanic Logic Behind the Slaughter Call
Defenders of this drivel squirm: It’s not violence; it’s purging hypocrisy! Quran 107:4-6 lambasts those who pray with detached hearts, they claim. Fine, but where’s the proportionality? A boastful prayer doesn’t warrant death, especially not in a mosque Islam claims as inviolable. Muhammad routinely forgave Mecca’s polytheists—why not this guy? Because he wanted to kill him without reason that challenged his supremacy. Pride wasn’t just the man’s sin; it was Muhammad’s trigger, mirroring Iblis’s fall.
This hadith reeks of Satan’s playbook: divide, intimidate, destroy from within. Islam’s purification of the ummah? Code for eliminating dissent. The man’s obscurity in Al-Isabah proves it—he’s no companion, just cannon fodder. Hilyat al-Awliya contrasts him with true saints, while Ibn Kathir slots it into Medina’s paranoia phase, rife with hypocrite hunts. Not in Bukhari or Muslim? Weak authenticity, sure—but its endurance in tafsir and tarikh shows Muslims lapped it up as gospel.
Zoom out: Islam demands submission, not sincerity. Rituals blind followers to rot. Arrogance nullifies deeds? Then half the ummah is doomed, from imams hoarding wealth to suicide bombers chanting Allahu Akbar. This story doesn’t teach humility; it terrorizes it into submission. He wanted to kill him without reason exposes the fraud: a religion where Satan lurks in every critic, justifying rivers of blood under piety’s cloak.
Exposing Islam’s Fraudulent Facade: Satan’s Mark on the Prophet’s Legacy
Let’s gut this further. Muhammad’s insight into Satan’s facial tattoos? Classic cult gaslighting. No miracles, just vibes—and deadly ones. Compare to Jesus turning cheeks or Buddha preaching non-violence; Muhammad incites beheading. This hadith fuels jihadist manuals today—from ISIS mosque massacres to honor killings masked as moral cleansing.
Islam apologists twist: It’s a test for companions! Bull. Abu Bakr’s pause shows even loyalists recoiled, yet the command wasn’t retracted. It’s psychological warfare, imprinting obedience over ethics. Broader implications? Mosques as kill-zones when convenient—witness today’s fatwas against blasphemers.
Scholars like Ibn Hajar gloss over it, but the stench lingers. Pride as Satan’s mark? Ironically, Muhammad’s harem-hoarding, warlord life drips kibr. He commands killing for it while embodying it? Satanic hypocrisy at its peak.
Modern Muslims cherry-pick tolerant verses, ignoring gems like this. But he wanted to kill him without reason screams the truth: Islam’s core is conquest, not compassion. Satan’s fraud thrives on such double-standards—pray five times daily, murder without qualms.
Lessons in Deception: Why This Hadith Dooms Islam
From these texts, we glean Islam’s Achilles’ heel: performative faith without heart. Abu Nu’aym’s Hilyat lionizes saints, but this interloper mocks them. Ibn Kathir’s history reeks of fabrication to saint-ify Muhammad. The hadith’s circulation despite weak chains? Because it serves power—scare believers straight.
For ex-Muslims and skeptics, it’s vindication. Satan-marked faces? Look in the mirror, oh Prophet. Your revelation births monsters. True faith builds; Islam breaks.
Conclusion: The Enduring Horror of He Wanted to Kill Him Without Reason
He wanted to kill him without reason isn’t ancient trivia—it’s Islam’s DNA: violence veiled as virtue, Satan celebrated as sanctity. Muhammad’s mosque murder-call shatters the religion of peace myth, revealing a satanic fraud preying on the pious. Arrogance voids worship? Then Islam’s empire of empty rituals collapses.
Believers, heed: Your prayers shield nothing if pride festers. Skeptics, celebrate exposure—this hadith torpedoes apologetics. In a world weary of holy wars, he wanted to kill him without reason warns: Reject the mark of Satan. Ditch the fraud. Embrace light over this prophetic darkness.
(Word count: 1,248)
