He Ordered the Stoning of Ma‘iz ibn Malik
Imagine a so-called prophet presiding over the brutal murder of a desperate man begging for purification, turning a moment of human anguish into a blood-soaked spectacle. This is the ugly reality of the stoning of Ma‘iz ibn Malik, a harrowing tale from the hadiths that exposes Islam—not as a religion of mercy, but as a satanic fraud built on savagery, fabricated laws, and psychological terror. Peddled in Sunan Abi Dawud by Abu Hurayrah, this narration (Hadith 5544) isn’t a testament to divine justice; it’s a damning indictment of Muhammad’s tyranny, where a married man’s confession of adultery leads to his barbaric execution by rocks. Far from profound, the stoning of Ma‘iz ibn Malik reveals Islam’s core rot: hudud punishments that contradict the Quran, a prophet more concerned with power than pity, and a doctrine that glorifies death over redemption. In an age screaming for human rights, this story unmasks the fraud at Islam’s heart—a violent ideology masquerading as holiness.
The Persistent Confession: Ma‘iz’s Torment Under Muhammad’s Inquisition
Picture Ma‘iz ibn Malik, a hapless soul from the Aslami tribe, crushed by guilt over zina (adultery). In a cult of fear and confession, he approaches Muhammad not once, but four times, spilling his sin like a broken dam. What does the merciful prophet do? He turns away each time—not out of compassion, as apologists spin, but likely dodging the mess of enforcing a punishment absent from the Quran. Stoning for adultery? Nowhere in the holy book Muhammad claimed to reveal. Surah An-Nur 24:2 demands flogging—100 lashes for all fornicators. Rajm, the stoning ritual, is a satanic innovation, a pre-Islamic Jewish relic Muhammad grafted onto his fraud to control lascivious followers and cement tribal dominance.
Undeterred by rejection, Ma‘iz returns a fifth time, his mind possibly unraveling from shame or cult indoctrination. Enter Muhammad’s grotesque inquisition: Did you have intercourse with her? Yes. Then the perverse probing: Until that (organ) disappeared into that (place)? Like the kohl-stick disappears into the kohl container and the rope into the well? This isn’t wisdom; it’s voyeuristic filth, Muhammad reveling in lurid details to titillate or humiliate. Ma‘iz confirms, begging, Purify me. Purify? By bludgeoning him to death? This exposes Islam’s fraudulent tawbah—repentance twisted into suicidal masochism, where the only path to forgiveness is public execution. No therapy, no private atonement; just rocks and blood, echoing the barbarism of ancient deserts, not a loving God.
Scholars like Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar later scramble to justify it, insisting the confession was voluntary. Nonsense. In a 7th-century theocracy where doubting Muhammad meant death (remember the apostasy killings?), this was coerced desperation. Ma‘iz, married and thus eligible for stoning per fabricated Sunnah, seals his doom. Muhammad orders the deed, transforming a sinner into a corpse. The stoning of Ma‘iz ibn Malik wasn’t justice; it was judicial murder, a cornerstone of Sharia’s bloodlust that modern Islamists still defend in places like Iran and Saudi Arabia.
The Prophet’s Wisdom: A Sadistic Rebuke to Human Decency
As stones pummel Ma‘iz to pulp, two companions dare whisper humanity: Look at this one whom Allah had concealed—yet he would not leave it until he was stoned like a dog. Finally, a flicker of sanity amid the madness! They see the horror: Allah supposedly hid the sin, yet Muhammad dragged it into daylight for a killing show. But oh, the wisdom strikes back. Muhammad overhears, broods silently—perhaps plotting his retort—then spots a rotting donkey carcass, leg obscenely raised.
He commands the critics by name: Get down and eat from the carcass of this donkey! They balk: O Prophet of Allah, who would eat from this? His comeback? What you committed against your brother’s honor earlier is more severe than eating from it. By Him in whose hand is my soul, he is now in the rivers of Paradise, plunging into them. Eat rotting flesh? This is the rant of a deranged warlord, equating gossip with cannibalism while hallucinating paradise for a murder victim. Backbiting worse than stoning? Only in Islam’s inverted morality, where tongues are policed but lives are expendable.
This episode screams fraud: Muhammad retroactively saintifies his victim to silence dissent, peddling postmortem paradise as consolation for barbarity. No grief, no reflection—just deflection and domination. The stoning of Ma‘iz ibn Malik thus doubles as a masterclass in cult control: dissenters humiliated, the dead deified, and the faithful gaslit into praising atrocity.
Unmasking the Deeper Fraud: Stoning’s Quranic Absence and Historical Fabrication
Dig deeper, and the stoning of Ma‘iz ibn Malik crumbles under scrutiny. The Quran explicitly rejects stoning: The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication—flog each of them with a hundred stripes (24:2). No exceptions for the married. Yet Muhammad imposes rajm here and in other hadiths (Bukhari 8:82:809, Muslim 17:4191-4206), claiming Sunnah overrides scripture. Satanic indeed—this abrogates Allah’s word with man-made mayhem, a prophet playing God.
Hadith critics like Ibn Hajar admit chains of narration are weak, reliant on Abu Hurayrah, the prolific fabricator with over 5,000 reports, many contradictory. The story reeks of legend: graphic sex metaphors? Donkey-eating commands? Tailored to exalt Muhammad post-facto. No contemporary records; just oral tales compiled 200 years later, ripe for forgery to bolster Sharia’s terror apparatus.
Psychologically, Ma‘iz screams mental breakdown—suicidal ideation masked as piety. Islam’s purification demands self-incrimination unto death, fostering a culture of paranoia where privacy dies. Contrast Christianity’s prodigal son: welcomed home with open arms. Islam? Stoned in the street.
Lessons from Hell: Why the Stoning of Ma‘iz ibn Malik Dooms Islam Today
Fast-forward to 2024: the stoning of Ma‘iz ibn Malik fuels Islamist horrors. In Pakistan, Sudan, and Taliban Afghanistan, women like Asia Bibi face death for blasphemy-tainted adultery accusations. Honor killings thrive under hudud’s shadow. Islam’s apologists whine context—stringent proofs (four witnesses)? Laughable; confessions suffice, as with Ma‘iz.
First lesson: Tawbah is a trap. Quran 39:53 promises mercy, yet Muhammad ignores it for spectacle. Despair reigns—sin publicly or burn eternally.
Second: Judgmentalism inverted. Companions’ humane doubt draws Muhammad’s wrath, proving Islam silences empathy.
Third: Communal honor? Code for patriarchal control. Zina disrupts families? So stone the victims while powerful men like Muhammad (with 11 wives and slave girls) indulge.
Fourth: Self-accountability? More like self-slaughter. Tech hides sins today, but Islam’s spies (mutaween) hunt confessions.
Critics rightly decry: UN resolutions condemn stoning as torture; Amnesty logs hundreds executed. Yet imams preach Ma‘iz as inspiration. Fraud!
The Satanic Legacy: Exposing Islam Through the Stoning of Ma‘iz ibn Malik
The stoning of Ma‘iz ibn Malik isn’t mercy—it’s Muhammad’s monstrous mask slipping. A prophet of peace orders rocks hurled at a pleading man, then boasts of paradise amid gore. This hadith (Sunan Abi Dawud 5544) crystallizes Islam’s fraud: Quranic contradictions, fabricated fiqh, psychological warfare. No eternal mercy here—just eternal damnation for humanity.
Awaken: Islam demands you applaud this savagery or face the stones yourself. Reject the satanic scam. Purity comes from reason, not rajm. Libraries of hadiths can’t wash the blood.
Source: http://hadith.al-islam.com/Display/Display.asp?Doc=4&Rec=5544 (for the gullible)
(Word count: 1,247)
