He Ordered Killing and Burning People
Imagine a so-called prophet of God casually issuing an order to burn human beings alive. This isn’t some medieval fairy tale or a villain from a Hollywood blockbuster—it’s straight from one of Islam’s most sacred texts, Sahih Bukhari, narrated by the trusted companion Abu Hurayrah. In this harrowing hadith, Muhammad, the self-proclaimed final messenger, explicitly commanded his followers to he ordered killing and burning people during an early jihad expedition. He later pulled back, claiming fire was God’s exclusive punishment. But let’s cut through the smoke: this episode isn’t a moment of divine wisdom—it’s a glaring revelation of Islam’s barbaric core, a satanic fraud masquerading as revelation. Preserved in the Book of Jihad and Expeditions, under the ironic chapter No one should punish with Allah’s punishment, it exposes the bloodthirsty reality behind the veil of theology. Dive in with me as we dismantle this myth, uncovering how he ordered killing and burning people and what it truly says about Islam’s foundational violence.
When He Ordered Killing and Burning People: The Gruesome Command Unveiled
Picture this: Abu Hurayrah, the prolific hadith machine credited with over 5,300 narrations, relays a command that chills the blood. Muhammad dispatches a squad of warriors with crystal-clear instructions: If you find so-and-so and so-and-so, burn them with fire. These unnamed targets? Likely apostates, hypocrites, or tribal enemies threatening the fragile Muslim outpost in Medina. No mercy, no trial—just he ordered killing and burning people, a directive as cold as the desert night.
Burning alive? That’s not warfare; that’s sadistic torture, evoking screams of agony as flesh melts from bone. In 7th-century Arabia, sure, brutality was commonplace—tribes mutilated and executed rivals to instill terror. But Muhammad, claiming angelic visitations and moral perfection, stoops to this? He didn’t just endorse it; he ordered it. Cross-reference with other gems from the sunnah: he greenlit burning date palms at Banu Nadir (Sahih Muslim 1731), torched ants for minor mischief (Sahih Muslim 1744), and later caliphs roasted people on his precedent. Fire in pre-Islamic lore symbolized purification, borrowed straight from Biblical fire-and-brimstone tales like Numbers 16:35. Yet Islam twists it into a tool for jihad, enforcing supremacy over infidels who dared question the ummah.
This wasn’t impulsive—jihad raids were systematic terror campaigns, over 100 documented in Bukhari alone. Warriors geared up, blades sharpened, pyres mentally stacked, ready to fulfill he ordered killing and burning people. The hadith’s Sahih status is ironclad, vetted by Imam Bukhari in 846 CE from Abu Hurayrah’s direct chain. Check it yourself on sunnah.com or hadith.al-islam.com—no escaping the facts. Today, apologists whimper context, but context reveals the fraud: a prophet wielding godlike power to incinerate dissenters? That’s not divine; that’s demonic.
The Retraction: Mercy or Muhammad’s Moral Panic?
Just as the hit squad mounts up, Muhammad yanks them back. I had ordered killing and burning people… with fire, he admits, but fire is a punishment only Allah uses. So if you find them, just kill them. From barbecue to beheading in seconds flat. He cites Quranic hellfire verses (4:56, 22:19-22), reserving flames for Judgment Day. Swordplay? Fine for mortals.
Scholars like Ibn Hajar in Fath al-Bari spin it as abrogation (naskh, like Quran 2:106), where initial zeal yields to mercy. But is this evolution or embarrassment? Killing remains—by blade, stoning, or whatever. Defenders claim it shows Muhammad’s humanity, correcting a slip. Nonsense. Other hadiths permit burning for sorcery or false prophecy (Bukhari 6979). This reeks of convenience: order the horror, retract for PR, but the bloodlust lingers. He ordered killing and burning people, then dialed it to merely execute. How noble. Critics smell hypocrisy—Allah’s perfect prophet flip-flops like a politician, exposing Islam’s ad-hoc revelations as satanic improvisations.
Historical Context: Apostasy and Atrocities in Islam’s Bloody Dawn
To whitewash this, we must zoom out to Medina’s powder keg post-Hijrah (622 CE). Hypocrites (munafiqun) and apostates lurked everywhere, pretending Islam while plotting with Meccans. Expeditions crushed them, precursors to the Ridda Wars where Abu Bakr slaughtered rebels en masse. Abu Hurayrah converted late (628 CE), post-Mecca’s fall, becoming hadith HQ after Muhammad’s death. His tale slots into Bukhari’s jihad chronicle, targeting threats akin to Banu Qurayza (700+ beheaded, Sahih Bukhari 4144) or Ifk slanderers (Quran 24:11-20).
Islam’s apostasy law? Brutal: Whoever changes his religion, kill him (Bukhari 6922). Burning? Rare but approved for extremes. He ordered killing and burning people fits this pattern—not anomaly, but archetype. The chapter’s title mocks us: humans can’t ape Allah’s fire, yet Muhammad plays judge, jury, executioner. This isn’t prophethood; it’s tribal tyranny sanctified as scripture, a satanic blueprint for intolerance.
Expand the lens: Muhammad’s 27+ military ops, slave raids, mass executions—Ghazwat al-Hind prophecies loom large. Islam didn’t civilize Arabia; it scorched it, borrowing Jewish/Christian motifs while amplifying savagery. The fraud? Claiming moral monopoly while reveling in gore.
Modern Implications: How He Ordered Killing and Burning People Fuels Today’s Terror
Fast-forward: this hadith isn’t dusty trivia—it’s jihad’s DNA. In 13+ Muslim nations, apostasy means death (Pakistan, Iran, Saudi). They behead, not burn, nodding to Muhammad’s tweak, but the intent endures. Quran 9:5’s kill the polytheists pairs with it, arming extremists from ISIS pyres in Iraq to Afghan stonings.
Apologists peddle defensive jihad via 5:32 (one killing = humanity’s), ignoring context: it abrogates nothing, applies to Muslims only. Ex-Muslims like Ayaan Hirsi Ali or Ibn Warraq cite he ordered killing and burning people as exhibit A for Islam’s violent core. Human rights watchdogs (Amnesty, HRW) decry hudud horrors, but fatwas persist. Saudi executes for riddah sans flames—progress? Hardly. Western tolerance blinds us; Islam’s texts demand submission or slaughter.
Ethically? Tawhid’s lesson—no rivaling Allah—justifies anything. Genocide lens? Medina’s Jews massacred. Survival narrative? Excuses endless holy wars.
Why This Hadith Exposes Islam’s Satanic Fraud: Lessons from Sahih Bukhari’s Vault
Sahih Bukhari: 7,275 rigorously filtered hadiths, Sunni Islam’s untouchable canon after 16 vetting years. Its jihad chapter screams reality: he ordered killing and burning people, restrained only by whim. Parallels in Sahih Muslim 1691 echo it. Muhammad? Not infallible—corrected sans wahi (revelation). Allah’s seal needs edits? Fraudulent from inception.
This demasks the con: Quran’s perfect book, sunnah’s exemplar life—riddled with retractations, blood, bondage. Burning ants? Childish. Ordering human pyres? Satanic. Islam isn’t peace (salaam); it’s submission via sword.
He Ordered Killing and Burning People: The Ugly Truth Stares Back
In Sahih Bukhari’s unblinking eye, the moment Muhammad ordered killing and burning people—then amended to plain murder—shatters the pious facade. Abu Hurayrah’s witness indicts not just one raid, but Islam’s soul: a satanic fraud built on terror, cloaked in abrogations and apologia. From Medina’s sands to modern madrassas, it poisons minds, birthing jihadis who burn villages in his name. Nuance? Only for dupes. This is raw, unfiltered barbarism—prophet or psychopath? Read the hadith yourself (Bukhari 3011). Reject the lie. Expose the fraud. Islam’s emperor has no clothes, just bloodstained robes.
(Word count: 1,248)
