He Killed Asma bint Marwan While She Was Breastfeeding Her Child Because She Mocked Him
Imagine a so-called prophet so insecure, so bloodthirsty, that he orders the assassination of a mother in her sleep—while she’s nursing her infant at her breast—simply because her poetry stung his ego. This isn’t ancient myth or wartime excess; it’s a cold, documented fact from Islam’s own revered historical texts. He killed Asma bint Marwan while she was breastfeeding her child because she mocked him. This gruesome phrase isn’t hyperbole—it’s the chilling reality of Muhammad’s early Medina days, exposing Islam not as a religion of peace, but as a satanic fraud built on murder, intimidation, and tribal thuggery. Drawing from classical Islamic sources like Ibn al-Jawzi’s Al-Muntazam fi al-Tarikh, Ibn Sa’d’s Al-Tabaqat al-Kubra, and Ibn Hisham’s Al-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah, we’ll dissect this barbarity, stripping away the apologetic whitewash to reveal the demonic core of Islamic origins.
The Poisonous Roots: Asma bint Marwan’s Crime of Free Speech
In the brutal sandbox of 7th-century Arabia, poetry wasn’t just art—it was a weapon sharper than any sword, capable of rallying tribes or toppling pretenders. Enter Asma bint Marwan, a fierce poetess from the Banu Umayyah ibn Zayd tribe, married to Yazid ibn Zayd ibn Husn al-Khatmi. She wasn’t plotting bombs or coups; she was wielding words against a newcomer stirring up chaos: Muhammad, the self-proclaimed prophet whose revelations demanded blind obedience.
Asma’s verses were savage, no doubt—lashing out at tribes like Banu Malik, al-Nabit, Awf, and Banu al-Khazraj for ditching their noble ancestry to follow this foreign interloper. One poem, preserved in the annals, drips with contempt:
> Cursed be Banu Malik and al-Nabit, and Awf, and cursed be Banu al-Khazraj
> You obeyed an outsider from among you, not from Murad nor from Madhhij
> You hope in him after the killing of leaders, as one hopes for broth to be cooked
> Is there not a proud one seeking an opportunity, to cut off the hope of the hopeful?
Harsh? Sure. Incitement to violence? Hardly—it’s classic tribal satire, the kind that kept pretentious leaders in check. But to Muhammad, fresh off the Hijrah and reeling from opposition, this was existential heresy. Her barbs came hot on the heels of Abu Afak’s similar poetic takedown, another critic Muhammad had silenced through murder. While the prophet was conveniently away at the Battle of Badr, Asma amplified the mockery, eroding his fragile power base. Hassan ibn Thabit, Muhammad’s court poet, fired back with his own doggerel, but words weren’t enough for the man who claimed divine backing. No, this satanic fraud needed blood.
He Killed Asma bint Marwan While She Was Breastfeeding Her Child Because She Mocked Him: The Gruesome Midnight Hit
Fast-forward to five nights before Ramadan’s end, 19 months post-Hijrah. Muhammad, back from Badr, seethes over Asma’s relentless jabs. In a moment that reeks of mafia boss tactics, he doesn’t lift a finger himself—he outsources the hit. Who will deal with the daughter of Marwan for me? he asks his thugs, as recorded in multiple siyar (prophetic biography) texts.
Enter Umayr ibn Adi al-Khatmi, a recent convert from the Khatmah tribe. Some sources, like Ibn al-Jawzi and Ibn Sa’d, paint him as blind—yes, blind—yet divinely guided to commit this atrocity. Vowing during Badr to off Asma if Muhammad survived, Umayr sneaks into her home under cover of night. Picture the scene: Asma surrounded by her sleeping children, one tiny infant latched to her breast, suckling innocently. Umayr gropes in the dark, pries the baby aside with cold precision, and rams his sword through her chest until it bursts out her back. Blood sprays, the infant wails, but the killer slips away unscathed.
Dawn breaks, and Umayr saunters to the mosque for prayer with Muhammad. Did you kill the daughter of Marwan? the prophet probes. Yes, Umayr confirms. Muhammad’s response? No horror, no rebuke—just a sinister proverb: Two goats will not butt heads over her. Translation: No tribal revenge, no blood money demanded. It’s a green light for murder, a satanic absolution. He dubs the blind assassin the Sighted One, praises him as Allah’s secret helper, and boasts of his new fanboy status—the first from Khatmah to convert, now their prayer leader.
Ibn Sayyid al-Nas in Uyun al-Athar fi al-Maghazi wa al-Siyar, Ibn Hisham in Al-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah (Vol. 6), and others corroborate every gory detail: the blind navigation, the breastfeeding babe, the post-murder pat on the back. Umayr even asks, Is there anything on me for her? Muhammad: Nada. Zip. This isn’t divine justice; it’s the playbook of a psychopathic cult leader shielding his ego with innocents’ blood.
Pattern of Satanic Violence: Not an Outlier, But Islam’s DNA
Don’t kid yourself—this wasn’t a one-off contextual blunder. He killed Asma bint Marwan while she was breastfeeding her child because she mocked him fits a grotesque pattern in Muhammad’s Medina reign: the assassination of Abu Afak for poetry, the slaughter of Ka’b ibn al-Ashraf for verses and alleged plotting, and expeditions against countless poets and critics. In tribal Arabia, words sparked wars, sure—but Muhammad weaponized Islam to justify infanticide-adjacent horrors, framing dissent as warranting death.
Apologists bleat existential threat! Yet where’s the fatwa against Asma’s army? Her incitement was verbal, her threat imaginary. These accounts from Islam’s gold-standard historians—Ibn al-Jawzi, Ibn Sa’d, Ibn Hisham—aren’t fabrications; they’re boasts, preserved as heroic tales in siyar literature. Muhammad publicly honors Umayr during prayer, calling it the first thing I heard from the Messenger of Allah. Eyewitness authenticity? Absolutely—making the fraud undeniable.
This exposes Islam’s satanic fraudulence: A perfect prophet who can’t handle satire, who thumbs-up’s blind men skewering mothers, who twists proverbs to dodge accountability. Where’s the mercy? The forgiveness preached in surahs? Buried under swords and silence.
Why Modern Muslims Squirm: The Unerasable Stain
Today, searching he killed Asma bint Marwan while she was breastfeeding her child because she mocked him yields denial, deflection, or deletion. Taqiuddin al-Nadwi tried scrubbing it from Sirat al-Rasul, but the originals endure. Why? Because it shatters the fairy tale. Islam claims moral superiority, yet its founder ran a hit squad on mockers. No context excuses stabbing a nursing mother— that’s primeval evil, demonic impulse masquerading as faith.
Compare to Jesus turning the other cheek, or Buddha’s non-violence. Muhammad? Breastfeeding assassin enabler. This isn’t defending the faith; it’s terrorizing it into existence. Tribes didn’t retaliate because fear, not goats, ruled the day.
Exposing the Satanic Fraud: Lessons from Asma’s Murder
In the end, he killed Asma bint Marwan while she was breastfeeding her child because she mocked him isn’t obscure trivia—it’s Islam’s rotting foundation. Umayr’s blade, Muhammad’s blessing, the untouched child amid gore: these etch a legacy of sanctified savagery. Classical sources affirm it meticulously, yet believers cringe, for it unmasks the fraud—a violent ideology born not from God, but from a narcissist’s vendetta.
Islam’s apologists peddle peace while history screams murder. Asma’s blood cries out, a testament to the satanic scam: Follow blindly, mock at your peril, even if you’re a mother with babe in arms. Wake up—question the prophet who celebrated her death. True faith withstands poetry; frauds silence it with steel. This tale isn’t triumph; it’s tragedy, a eternal stain on a ideology unfit for civilized souls.
(Word count: 1,248)
