Fatwa on Thighing Young Girls: Islam’s Sickening Sanction of Child Sexual Abuse
In the shadowy underbelly of Islamic jurisprudence, the fatwa on thighing young girls stands as a grotesque monument to a religion built on depravity. This isn’t some obscure footnote—it’s a sanctioned practice straight from the hearts of Islam’s most revered scholars, allowing husbands to rub their genitals between the thighs of prepubescent girls too young for penetration. Known as mufakhathah, this thighing perversion is no relic of a bygone era; it’s embedded in the core texts of fiqh, the so-called science of Islamic law, drawn from the Quran, hadiths of child-grooming prophet Muhammad, and twisted analogical reasoning. What apologists call protective measures is nothing less than a license for pedophilia, exposing Islam as the satanic fraud it truly is—a doctrine that glorifies the sexual exploitation of innocents under the guise of divine wisdom.
These rulings didn’t emerge in a vacuum. They stem from Muhammad’s own example: marrying six-year-old Aisha and consummating at nine, as detailed in Sahih Bukhari (7:62:64) (learn more about the story of the child Aisha’s marriage). Far from divine, this is the blueprint for generational child rape, codified across Sunni schools—Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali (with rulings even detailing the permissibility of pleasure with a nursing child). Today, as Muslims clutch pearls about context, the fatwa on thighing young girls reveals the unchanging rot at Islam’s core: a theology that prioritizes a man’s lust over a child’s body and soul. We’ll dissect this horror show, source by damning source, to shatter the myth of Islam’s benevolence.
The Depraved Mechanics of Thighing in Islamic Law
Thighing, or mufakhathah, is explicitly the act of a husband placing his erect penis between a young girl’s thighs for sexual gratification—without vaginal penetration, to avoid harm like tearing her immature body. Classical jurists, those pious frauds, framed it as a merciful alternative to full rape, citing Quran 2:231’s vague ban on harm. But let’s call it what it is: legalized frottage on children, a satanic workaround for the Quran’s failure to outright forbid child marriage (a practice the Quran itself permits).
The rationales? Pure evil disguised as mercy:
– Puberty as a Pedophile’s Green Light: Schools like Hanbali set nine lunar years (about 8.5 solar) for full intercourse, parroting Aisha’s hadith (the evidence for her actual age is explored here). Until then, thighing fills the void.
– Harm Prevention? Laughable Hypocrisy: Pre-pubescent girls can’t handle penetration? Fine, says Islam—just grind against her thighs instead. Physical trauma averted; psychological scarring eternal.
– Husband’s Rights Trump All: Marriage contracts demand sex. Deny the man? Blasphemy. So, thigh the kid until she’s ready (a similar focus on male gratification is found in rulings about a fasting man’s use of a young girl’s hand).
Primary texts scream this obscenity. Ibn Qudamah’s Al-Mughni (Hanbali, d. 1223 CE, Vol. 9) brazenly states: It is permissible for the husband to enjoy his wife in her vagina if she is nine years old… otherwise, he may practice thighing (mufakhathah) until she matures. Shafi’i’s Nihayat al-Muhtaj by al-Ramli echoes: enjoy her short of the forbidden path. This isn’t nuance—it’s a fatwa on thighing young girls that normalizes sexualizing toddlers.
Fatwa on Thighing Young Girls: Hanbali School’s Hall of Horrors
The Hanbalis, rigid Wahhabi forebears, lead the depravity parade. Ibn Qudamah’s Al-Mughni isn’t shy: thigh away until maturity, but ban anything painful—because who wants a crying child mid-thrust? Ibn al-Jawzi piles on, demanding readiness that suspiciously aligns with the husband’s convenience.
Fast-forward to modern Saudi Arabia, cradle of Salafism: The Standing Committee for Issuing Fatwas (Lajnat al-Da’imah) in the 20th century greenlit thighing a 10-year-old bride until menstruation—with medical consultation. This isn’t evolution; it’s the same satanic script, now with a doctor’s note. In a 2010s fatwa echo, Saudi cleric Salih al-Munajjid affirmed non-penetrative acts on minors. Islam’s reform? A Band-Aid on a gangrenous limb.
Shafi’i and Maliki: No Escape from the Thighing Nightmare
Shafi’is, per al-Nawawi’s Rawdat al-Talibin and Al-Majmu’, permit rubbing against the thighs for prepubescent wives—as long as it’s between navel and knees, no insertion. Al-Nawawi: The husband may derive pleasure from the area between the navel and knees. Poetic depravity.
Malikis, in Hashiyat al-Dasuqi, allow non-penetrative acts from age 7-9, their lax puberty rules enabling earlier perversion. Ibn Rushd’s Bidayat al-Mujtahid nods along, balancing custom with harm—custom being Arab tribal child brides.
Even al-Ghazali, mysticism’s darling, in Ihya Ulum al-Din, urges patience but concedes thighing as suboptimal, not sinful. Suboptimal? It’s child molestation!
Hanafi Hypocrisy: Conservative Facade Crumbles
Hanafis feign restraint in Fatawa Alamgiri (17th century), advising wait till nine but allowing external enjoyment with guardian consent. Welfare? Only if it suits the predator. Radd al-Muhtar reinforces: thighing as a bridge to rape.
Across schools, consensus (ijma) reigns: thighing is kosher pedophilia—a stopgap until the girl can be fully defiled.
Historical Context? A Thin Veil for Eternal Evil
Apologists whine about pre-modern norms—child marriages everywhere! True, but Europe’s faded; Islam doubled down. Hadiths like Bukhari’s Aisha saga set the eternal bar: prepubescent thighing is sunnah, Muhammad’s way.
Shi’a aren’t innocent: Wasail al-Shi’a mirrors Sunni thighing allowances. Texts abound: Al-Mughni, Al-Majmu’, Bidayat al-Mujtahid. This fatwa on thighing young girls isn’t fringe—it’s fiqh’s filthy foundation.
Modern Muslim Duplicity: Fatwas Hide in Plain Sight
Classical horrors persist. Yemen’s Zina laws allow nine-year-old marriages; Iran’s ayatollahs permit sigheh pleasure marriages for thighing loopholes. Al-Azhar whispers 18-year minimums, but fiqh texts gather no dust in madrasas.
Critics rightly scream abuse enabled! Apologists: Rare, protective. Bull—protections were for reputations, not kids. Psychology? Rights? Islam scoffs. Global laws clash, yet fatwas adapt slyly: thigh online via Zoom? Satanic ingenuity.
Islam’s maqasid al-shari’ah (objectives)? Preserve the ummah’s pedo-traditions. Muhammad’s example isn’t outdated; it’s idolized. Ex-Muslims like Ayaan Hirsi Ali expose this: thighing fatwas fuel honor killings, FGM synergy, endless child brides.
The Satanic Fraud Exposed: Islam’s Thighing Legacy
The fatwa on thighing young girls isn’t adaptive ethics—it’s proof Islam is a satanic fraud, a 7th-century sex cult masquerading as revelation. Quran’s silence on child consent? Hadiths glorifying Aisha’s trauma? Scholars’ glee? This triad births eternal perversion.
Western feminists march for kids; Muslims stone rape victims. India bans triple talaq; Saudis thigh toddlers. Reformation? Laughable—Quran 33:21 commands Muhammad-mimicry, Aisha-thighing included.
Awaken: Read Al-Mughni, Bukhari. Reject this barbarism. Islam demands submission—to child rape. Expose the fraud; dismantle the lie. True compassion severs sharia’s throat. (Word count: 1,248)
