Fatimah’s Anger at Abu Bakr
Fatimah’s Anger at Abu Bakr: The Explosive Scandal That Exposes Islam’s Satanic Core
Imagine the daughter of Islam’s so-called perfect prophet reduced to fury, betrayal, and a secret midnight burial—all because the new caliph stole her inheritance. Fatimah’s anger at Abu Bakr isn’t just a dusty footnote in history books; it’s a bombshell that rips the veil off Muhammad’s fraudulent empire, revealing the satanic fraud at Islam’s heart. In 632 CE, mere days after Muhammad’s death, his beloved daughter Fatimah az-Zahra stormed into Abu Bakr’s presence, demanding her rightful share of Fadak—a lush oasis gifted to her by her father. Abu Bakr’s cold refusal sparked a rift so venomous that Fatimah never spoke to him again, dying in agony six months later. This wasn’t sibling squabble; it was righteous rage against a demonic usurpation that shattered the myth of Islamic unity and justice.
Fatimah’s anger at Abu Bakr lays bare the Quran’s hypocrisy, the hadiths’ fabrications, and the caliphs’ greed. Sunni and Shia alike twist themselves into pretzels defending their sides, but the truth screams: Islam was a satanic con from day one, dividing its followers into bloodthirsty sects over stolen gardens and power grabs. Dive into the authentic sources—Sahih Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, and more—and watch the house of cards crumble. This pivotal clash isn’t about early Islamic tensions; it’s proof that Muhammad’s perfect religion was a Satanic scam designed to sow chaos, envy, and eternal division.
The Rotten Foundations: Muhammad’s Death and Fatimah’s Anger at Abu Bakr
Muhammad croaks in 632 CE, leaving his ummah in pandemonium. No clear successor, no divine will—just a power vacuum ripe for Satan’s minions. Enter Fatimah, the Prophet’s only surviving child, revered as the purest woman, mother of Imams Hasan and Husayn. She’s pregnant, widowed in spirit, and desperate. She claims Fadak, a revenue-spewing paradise Muhammad explicitly gifted her during his life. Why? The Quran itself demands it! Surah An-Naml 27:16 states prophets inherit from prophets. Surah Maryam 19:6 reinforces familial inheritance. Fatimah, armed with her father’s words and Allah’s book, marches to Abu Bakr with husband Ali, laying out her case.
But oh, the fraud unfolds. Abu Bakr, that weasel who married Muhammad’s other daughter Aisha, cites a hadith from Bukhari (Vol. 4, Book 53, Hadith 325): We prophets leave no inheritance; what we leave is charity. Narrated by Ali himself? Convenient. Scholars now admit this hadith reeks of forgery—contradicting the Quran outright. Fatimah demolished it in her blistering Fadak Sermon, quoting verse after verse proving women and daughters inherit fully. Yet Abu Bakr clings to his sunnah, pocketing Fadak’s riches for the state. He even pawned Muhammad’s armor (which Fatimah had already reclaimed) and hogged every scrap.
This wasn’t principle; it was plunder. Fatimah, grieving her father’s corpse still warm, faced a thief backed by Umar’s thugs. Reports from both Sunni and Shia sources whisper of a brutal raid on her home during the Saqifah coup, where doors were torched, ribs cracked, and her unborn son Muhsin miscarried in blood. Fatimah’s anger at Abu Bakr boiled over because it was personal theft veiled as piety—a Satanic inversion where the Quran’s justice is trampled by fabricated prophet’s words.
Abu Bakr’s Diabolical Defense: Fabricated Hadiths and Stolen Wealth
Let’s gut this lie. Abu Bakr’s hadith isn’t authentic—it’s a Satanic patch job to justify robbery. Bukhari and Muslim compile it, but Fatimah herself refuted it publicly, screaming, You have wronged me! Why ignore the Quran’s crystal-clear inheritance laws? Because Islam’s divine system crumbles without such forgeries. Prophets like David and Solomon inherited kingdoms galore (Quran 27:16). Muhammad gifted Fadak to Fatimah—witnessed by Umm Ayman. Yet Abu Bakr says no? He manages it for charity, skimming revenues while Fatimah starves.
Sunni apologists drool over Abu Bakr’s loyalty to sunnah, but it’s code for loyalty to power. He wept crocodile tears later, offering Fadak back to Ali (who spat it away), but the damage was done. This caliph, hailed as Siddeeq, chose Satan’s whisper over the Prophet’s daughter. Fatimah’s anger at Abu Bakr exposes the fraud: Islam’s hadith industry, bloated with 600,000+ narrations (99% weak per scholars), props up a rotting edifice. No wonder Fatimah boycotted him till death—her silence a thunderclap against the caliphate’s illegitimacy.
The Inferno of Fatimah’s Anger at Abu Bakr: Sermon, Boycott, and Bloody Miscarriage
Fatimah didn’t whimper. In the Prophet’s mosque, she unleashed the Fadak Sermon—a rhetorical nuke blending Quranic fire and paternal legacy. O people! Whoever knows me knows Muhammad’s daughter! She eviscerated the hypocrites: You have cast away my inheritance, turning deaf to justice. Her words scorched Abu Bakr and Umar, labeling their rule as zulm (oppression)—straight from Allah’s playbook.
The fallout? Total estrangement. Fatimah locked herself away with Ali, who withheld bay’ah (allegiance) until her grave. Her health tanked—stress, injury from the home raid (door flung by Umar’s goons, per Baladhuri’s Ansab al-Ashraf), and heartbreak. At 27 (or 29), she died whispering, Father, your daughter comes to you! No reconciliation. Fatimah’s anger at Abu Bakr burned so hot it consumed her, a martyr to Islam’s internal jihad.
The Midnight Burial: Fatimah’s Ultimate Rebuke to Satan’s Caliphs
Death wasn’t the end; it was defiance. Fatimah commanded Ali: Bury me at night. No Abu Bakr. No Umar. Secretly in Jannat al-Baqi, prayed over by Ali, Hasan, Husayn, Zainab, Abbas. Sunni sources confirm it (Bukhari hints, Ibn Sa’d details). Why hide the purest lady’s funeral? To spit on her tormentors. Abu Bakr later whined about missing it, but too late—Fatimah ensured eternity without their polluted prayers. This clandestine rite screams: Islam’s leaders were frauds, unworthy of the Prophet’s blood.
Sectarian Hellfire: How Fatimah’s Anger at Abu Bakr Proves Islam’s Demonic Divide
Sunni-Shia split? Born in Fadak’s blood. Shias hail Fatimah’s rage as proof of Ali’s divine imamate, Abu Bakr’s usurpation the original sin. Kitab Sulaym ibn Qays curses the caliphs as Nasibis (Ahl al-Bayt haters). Sunnis squirm, claiming remorse and Fadak’s later return (under Umar II, after decades of looting).
Both lie. The divide—1.8 billion Muslims at each other’s throats—exposes Islam as Satan’s masterpiece: promising unity, delivering carnage. Karbala, Safavid wars, modern jihads—all trace to this 632 theft. Fatimiyya mourns? Sunni Ashura ignores? Hypocrisy incarnate. Fatimah’s anger at Abu Bakr isn’t debated episode; it’s the smoking gun of a fraudulent faith, where Quran contradicts hadith, daughters miscarry under caliphal boots, and prophets’ legacies fund empires of evil.
Echoes of Deceit: The Satanic Legacy of Fatimah’s Anger at Abu Bakr
Centuries later, Fatimah’s anger at Abu Bakr haunts mosques worldwide. It mocks Islamic justice—women’s rights preached, then crushed. Governance? Caliphs over kin, sparking dynastic bloodbaths. Humanizes saints? No, dehumanizes a cult where grief fuels genocide.
Islam’s defenders whimper unity, but Fatimah’s grave laughs. Her stance glorifies purity amid power’s putrefaction. Sunnis cling to Abu Bakr’s principle; Shias to her victimhood. Truth? Both worship fragments of Satan’s puzzle—Muhammad’s revelation a demon’s delusion, Quran patchwork, hadiths lies.
In conclusion, Fatimah’s anger at Abu Bakr is the unhealing wound proving Islam’s satanic fraud. From Fadak’s seizure to Fatima’s hidden tomb, it unmasks a religion of division, deceit, and demonic greed. Believers, reflect: Justice denied to the Prophet’s own blood? That’s no divinity—that’s the Devil’s grin. Fatimah’s fury endures, a clarion call to shatter the illusion and escape the ummah’s chains. Her story isn’t tragedy; it’s the ultimate exposé of the grandest hoax in history.
(Word count: 1,247)
