Disputes after Muhammad’s Death
Imagine a so-called divine religion, proclaimed as the perfect and final revelation from God, crumbling into chaos the moment its founder dies. That’s exactly what happened with disputes after Muhammad’s death in 632 CE. The fragile house of cards that was early Islam teetered on the edge of total collapse, exposing the satanic fraud at its core. Far from the fairy-tale unity peddled by apologists, these disputes after Muhammad’s death ripped open the veil, revealing raw power struggles, tribal betrayals, and a holy book riddled with inconsistencies. Muhammad’s death didn’t just leave a leadership vacuum—it unmasked Islam as a man-made cult dependent entirely on one warlord’s cult of personality. These fractures birthed the Sunni-Shi’a schism and centuries of bloodshed, proving Islam’s unity was a mirage built on coercion, not conviction.
Drawing from unflinching historical sources like Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah and al-Tabari’s History, this exposé dismantles the myths. We’ll plunge into the heart of these disputes after Muhammad’s death, showing how they expose Islam’s demonic foundations—where faith was just a thin disguise for plunder, politics, and pagan holdovers.
Immediate Tribal Apostasy: The First Cracks in the Satanic Facade
The ink on Muhammad’s death certificate wasn’t even dry when Arabian tribes bolted from Islam like rats from a sinking ship. Why? Because Muhammad wasn’t some eternal prophet; he was a tribal strongman whose revelations were enforced by the sword and spoils. Tribes under false prophets like Tulayha of Banu Asad and the grotesque Musaylima of Banu Hanifa declared independence overnight, ditching Islam or swapping it for homegrown charlatans. This mass apostasy wasn’t rebellion against God—it was rejection of a dead man’s racket.
Enter the zakat scam: these believers refused to cough up the obligatory alms, seeing it not as worship but as tribute to Muhammad’s Medina mafia. Abu Bakr, the hastily anointed first caliph, went full tyrant: By Allah, if they withhold from me a kid they used to pay to the Messenger of Allah, I will fight them! Boom—disputes after Muhammad’s death exploded into the Wars of Apostasy (Ridda Wars), a bloodbath to drag tribes back into the fold. Khalid ibn al-Walid, the Sword of Allah, butchered rebels from Yamama to Oman, rivers of blood securing what prayers couldn’t: submission.
These wars weren’t holy; they were desperate damage control. Thousands perished, including hordes of qurra (Quran memorizers), crippling the very community they claimed to save. Here’s the satanic tell: Islam’s survival hinged on slaughter, not supernatural power. Without Muhammad’s terror, it was back to tribal square one—proof positive that this religion was a fraud propped up by fear.
The Saqifa Dispute: A Power Grab Masquerading as Piety
Core Tensions in the Leadership Coup
No event screams satanic fraud louder than the Saqifa Bani Sa’ida fiasco, the epicenter of disputes after Muhammad’s death. Muhammad croaks without naming a successor—surprise! No divine memo from Gabriel, just a power vacuum ripe for the picking. While Ali and family prepped the corpse, the Ansar (Medinan suck-ups) huddled to crown their own: Sa’d ibn Ubada. They knew the Qurayshi emigrants (Muhajirun) would shove them aside.
Enter Abu Bakr and Umar, crashing the party like mafia enforcers. Leadership stays with Quraysh! they barked, twisting Quran 28:5 to justify tribal nepotism. Abu Bakr got the nod in a smoke-filled backroom deal—secret, rushed, and reeking of coup. Ali ibn Abi Talib, Muhammad’s cousin and son-in-law (the Shi’a poster boy), was iced out entirely. Historians call it what it was: a hijacking of Alid rights, planting the seeds of eternal Sunni-Shi’a hate. If Islam was from God, why the scramble? Why no clear heir like Moses or Jesus supposedly had?
Ali’s Delayed Pledge and the Family Blood Feud
Ali dragged his feet on the bay’ah (pledge) for months, too busy burying Muhammad per family tradition. Or was it quiet defiance? Whispers say he opposed the steal. Worse, the disputes after Muhammad’s death turned personal and vicious. Fatimah, Muhammad’s darling daughter and Ali’s wife, demanded her slice of Fadak—a juicy oasis garden. Abu Bakr stonewalled her with a convenient hadith: prophets leave no inheritance, only knowledge. Liar! Fatimah raged, This is outright confiscation! She died heartbroken months later, Shi’a lore pinning it on Abu Bakr’s greed.
Picture it: the Prophet’s own flesh and blood robbed blind while caliphs play king. Ali caved under duress but nursed grudges forever. This wasn’t brotherhood; it was betrayal, exposing Islam’s ummah as a snake pit of favoritism. Satanic indeed—twisting faith to justify theft from widows.
The Wars of Apostasy: Blood to Baptize the Fraud
The Ridda Wars capped the disputes after Muhammad’s death in gore. Abu Bakr unleashed Khalid on apostates, turning Arabia into a slaughterhouse. Yamama’s carnage was legendary: Musaylima the liar hacked down amid 20,000 corpses, including Quran reciters whose deaths nearly wiped out the oral text. Pyrrhic? Understatement—these victories drained Islam dry, yet paved conquest roads under Umar.
Abu Bakr’s grit saved the day, but at what cost? Unity forged in pyres, not paradise promises. The fragility? Muhammad’s perfect religion couldn’t stand without his boot. Tribal loyalties trumped tawhid every time—damning evidence of Islam’s pagan roots masquerading as monotheism.
Divergent Quran Collections: The Holy Book’s Satanic Inconsistencies
Even Islam’s crown jewel, the Quran, cracked under disputes after Muhammad’s death. No golden plates or divine dictation booth—just scribbled suhuf from companions. Ubayy ibn Ka’b’s stash had extra surahs like Al-Hafd and Al-Khal’, ghosted from Uthman’s official version. Ibn Mas’ud ditched Surahs 1, 113, and 114, sticking to Meccan hits.
Blame oral mush and naskh (abrogation)—convenient excuses for revisions. Abu Bakr tasked Zayd ibn Thabit with stitching a codex; Uthman torched variants to enforce his cut. Unity? Nah, suppression. If this was Allah’s eternal word, why the mess? These variances scream human forgery—a satanic patchwork, not pristine revelation. Apologists squirm, but facts indict: Islam’s scripture survived by bonfire, not by divine fidelity.
Unveiling the Demonic Legacy
The disputes after Muhammad’s death—apostasy stampedes, zakat extortion, Saqifa coups, Fatimah’s tears, Ridda massacres, Quranic patchwork—shatter the delusion of seamless Islam. This wasn’t God’s plan; it was a power-hungry cult imploding, its unity a lie sustained by swords and spin. Schisms exploded immediately, wars raged for centuries, all because Muhammad’s satanic swindle had no legs without him.
Today, Muslims whitewash this turmoil as tests of faith, but it’s exposure: Islam’s a fraud, demonic in design, thriving on deception and division. Study these disputes after Muhammad’s death, and see the emperor naked—no robes of divinity, just bloodstained rags of tribal tyranny. True faith endures vacuum; this one vaporized, demanding we call it what it is: the ultimate satanic scam.
(Word count: 1,248)
