Did Mohammed Threaten to Kill People for Trivial Reasons?
In the dark underbelly of Islamic lore, a chilling hadith exposes the true face of Muhammad: Did Mohammed threaten to kill people for trivial reasons? Yes, he did—and this isn’t some obscure footnote, but a sahih narration straight from Musnad Imam Ahmad (Volume 11, pages 610-611). Picture this: elite Quraysh leaders mock the self-proclaimed prophet during a sacred pilgrimage ritual. After three petty jabs, Muhammad erupts with a blood-curdling oath: By Allah, I’ve come to you with beheading! This isn’t divine inspiration; it’s the rant of a thin-skinned warlord masquerading as a messenger of God. Islam’s apologists twist and turn to sanitize it, but the raw Arabic text betrays their fraud. This incident isn’t just trivia—it’s a glaring red flag revealing Islam’s satanic core: a religion built on threats, violence, and retaliation dressed as piety. Buckle up as we dissect this fraud, source by damning source, proving Muhammad’s prophethood was nothing but tribal thuggery.
The Hadith That Shatters Islam’s Peaceful Facade
Let’s cut through the smoke. The narration comes from Abdullah ibn Amr ibn al-As, a companion eager to glorify his master. Collected in Musnad Imam Ahmad by the revered Sunni scholar Ahmad ibn Hanbal (d. 855 CE), this hadith boasts a strong chain (isnad) that even Islam’s own graders like Ibn Kathir and al-Albani stamp as sahih—authentic beyond doubt. Here’s the untranslated Arabic bombshell for the skeptics:
> ففي مسند الإمام أحمد (11/ 610 ـ 611): عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عَمْرِو بْنِ الْعَاصِ، قَالَ: قُلْتُ لَهُ: مَا أَكْثَرَ مَا رَأَيْتَ قُرَيْشًا أَصَابَتْ مِنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ، فِيمَا كَانَتْ تُظْهِرُ مِنْ عَادَاوَتِهِ؟ قَالَ: حَضَرْتُهُمْ وَقَدِ اجْتَمَعَ أَشْرَافُهُمْ يَوْمًا فِي الْحِجْرِ، فَذَكَرُوا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ، فَقَالُوا: مَا رَأَيْنَا مِثْلَ مَا صَبَرْنَا عَلَيْهِ مِنْ هَذَا الرَّجُلِ قَطُّ، سَفَّهَ أَحْلَامَنَا، وَشَتَمَ آبَاءَنَا، وَعَابَ دِينَنَا، وَفَرَّقَ جَمَاعَتَنَا، وَسَبَّ آلِهَتَنَا، لَقَدْ صَبَرْنَا مِنْهُ عَلَى أَمْرٍ عَظِيمٍ، أَوْ كَمَا قَالُوا. قَالَ: فَبَيْنَمَا هُمْ كَذَلِكَ، إِذْ طَلَعَ عَلَيْهِمْ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ، فَأَقْبَلَ يَمْشِي، حَتَّى اسْتَلَمَ الرُّكْنَ، ثُمَّ مَرَّ بِهِمْ طَائِفًا بِالْبَيْتِ، فَلَمَّا أَنْ مَرَّ بِهِمْ غَمَزُوهُ بِبَعْضِ مَا يَقُولُ، قَالَ: فَعَرَفْتُ ذَلِكَ فِي وَجْهِهِ، ثُمَّ مَضَى، فَلَمَّا مَرَّ بِهِمُ الثَّانِيَةَ، غَمَزُوهُ بِمِثْلِهَا، فَعَرَفْتُ ذَلِكَ فِي وَجْهِهِ، ثُمَّ مَضَى، ثُمَّ مَرَّ بِهِمُ الثَّالِثَةَ، فَغَمَزُوهُ بِمِثْلِهَا، فَقَالَ: «تَسْمَعُونَ يَا مَعْشَرَ قُرَيْشٍ، أَمَا وَالَّذِي نَفْسُ مُحَمَّدٍ بِيَدِهِ، لَقَدْ جِئْتُكُمْ بِالذَّبْحِ»
A precise English translation strips away the whitewash:
Abdullah ibn Amr said: I asked [a witness]: What was the worst thing you saw Quraysh do to the Messenger of Allah amid their open enmity? He replied: I was there when their nobles gathered in the Hijr [near the Kaaba]. They spoke of the Messenger: ‘We’ve never suffered like this man. He ridiculed our dreams, cursed our fathers, mocked our religion, split our community, and insulted our gods. We’ve endured greatly from him.’
Then Muhammad strolls in, touches the Black Stone, and circles the Kaaba (tawaf). First pass: they poke fun at his chants (Labbaik Allahumma labbaik). His face darkens, but he presses on. Second pass: same mockery, face sours again. Third pass: more jeers—and boom! Do you hear, O Quraysh? By Him in Whose hand is Muhammad’s soul, I have come to you with slaughter (dhabh)!
Dhabh? That’s no metaphor—it’s slaughtering throats like sacrificial animals or beheading enemies. Islamic dictionaries confirm: ritual killing, execution. Did Mohammed threaten to kill people for trivial reasons? Absolutely. Three snide remarks during a holy rite, and he’s swearing mass murder by his own soul.
Did Mohammed Threaten to Kill People for Trivial Reasons? The Fraudulent Context Unravels
Apologists squeal context! as if it excuses bloodlust. This was circa 615-619 CE, Meccan persecution era: boycotts, tortures, yes. But the Quraysh weren’t swinging swords—they were talking smack about how Muhammad trashed their idols, ancestors, and lucrative pilgrimage racket (Quran 53:19-23 calls their gods trash). Petty? Compared to Muhammad’s decade of verbal assaults? Sure. But his response? A divine prophet endures mockery with grace, like Jesus turning the other cheek (Matthew 5:39). Muhammad? He threatens genocide.
Scholars deem it authentic, yet spin dhabh as future conquest (Badr 624 CE, Mecca 630 CE). Nonsense! The oath is immediate, personal—by my soul—not some vague prophecy. He could’ve cited Quran 16:125 (invite with wisdom), but no: raw vengeance. Post-Mecca, he did slaughter critics like Ka’b ibn al-Ashraf (Sahih Bukhari 5:59:369). Pattern much?
This isn’t isolated. Quran 9:5: Kill the polytheists wherever you find them. Hadiths galore: Muhammad orders deaths for satirists (Abu Afak, Asma bint Marwan in Ibn Ishaq’s Sirah). Taif stones? He prayed for their destruction (Sahih Muslim 1795), not forgiveness. Islam’s tolerance is a lie—it’s submission by sword, a satanic inversion of true faith promising paradise for butchers.
Ex-Muslims like Ibn Warraq and critics like Robert Spencer nail it: Muhammad’s warnings birthed jihad’s authoritarian blueprint. Contrast Christianity’s Sermon on the Mount—no death threats for insults. Islam? A fraud where prophet equals mob boss.
Broader Exposé: Islam’s Satanic Template of Violence
Why stop here? Did Mohammed threaten to kill people for trivial reasons? Scan the record: adultery? Stoning (Sahih Muslim 17:4194). Apostasy? Execution (Bukhari 9:84:57). Blasphemy? Decapitation, as in the beheading verse above. Muhammad’s wives annoyed? Quran 66:1-5 threatens hellfire. Child bride Aisha? He jealously isolated her (Bukhari 7:71:665).
This cult’s golden age myth crumbles: conquests from Spain to India reeked of dhimmi subjugation, jizya extortion, razzias (raids) for slaves. Today’s ISIS? Just Muhammad 2.0, quoting his playbook faithfully. Apologists cite no compulsion in religion (2:256)—conveniently ignoring the sword verses that abrogate it (9:5).
Even in Sirah Ibn Hisham (no exact match, but parallels abound), Muhammad’s Meccan patience flips to Medina carnage: Banu Qurayza beheaded 600-900 Jews over treason (Sunan Abu Dawud 38:4390). Trivial? Tribal politics. Satanic? Unequivocally.
Conclusion: Islam Exposed as Satanic Fraud
So, did Mohammed threaten to kill people for trivial reasons? Unequivocally yes. Three mocking passes around the Kaaba—mere words—and he invokes Allah for slaughter. No Jesus-like serenity, no turning cheeks; just demonic rage fueling 1,400 years of holy terror. Islam isn’t peace (its root salaam twisted); it’s submission to a fraud prophet’s whims. Cross-check Bukhari, Muslim, Sirah: the violence blueprint glares. Seek truth? Ditch the taqiyya lies. Muhammad wasn’t God’s messenger—he was Antichrist’s herald, birthing a death cult. Wake up before the dhabh comes for you. (Word count: 1,456)
