Cutting off Hands and Gouging out Eyes
Imagine a so-called prophet ordering the mutilation of helpless men: hands hacked off, feet severed, eyes gouged from their sockets, then left writhing in the blistering desert sun to die slowly in agony. This isn’t some ancient pagan ritual or a tale from a horror novel—it’s straight from Sahih Bukhari, the gold standard of Islamic hadiths, revered by over a billion Muslims as the unerring words and deeds of Muhammad. Cutting off hands and gouging out eyes isn’t an aberration; it’s a window into the satanic core of Islam, a fraudulent ideology masquerading as divine revelation while reveling in medieval savagery. Far from justice or mercy, this incident exposes Islam’s bloodthirsty essence, where a self-proclaimed messenger of God unleashes torturous brutality under the guise of piety. Let’s dissect this nightmare, stripping away the apologist spin to reveal the monstrous fraud at Islam’s heart.
The Gruesome Betrayal Tale: Setting the Stage for Horror
Narrated by Anas ibn Malik in Sahih Bukhari (Volume 8, Book 82, Hadith 794), the story begins deceptively benign. A band of nomads from the Ukl (or Uraynah) tribe rolls into Medina, converts to Islam for whatever tribal perks it offers, then starts whining about the city’s heat frying their desert-hardened hides. These Bedouins, used to endless sands, complain of illness—probably just culture shock or hypochondria.
Enter Muhammad, the merciful prophet, with his divine cure: camel milk and urine. Yes, you read that right—cutting off hands and gouging out eyes stems from a prescription involving drinking piss from charity camels. This wasn’t some fringe quackery; it’s touted in Islamic Prophetic medicine (tibb nabawi) as holy wisdom. Historical records and even dubious modern studies (quickly debunked) claim camel urine has anti-inflammatory properties, but let’s call it what it is: disgusting Bedouin folk remedy dressed up as revelation from an all-knowing God. The men slurp it down, miraculously recover, then—plot twist—they kill the shepherd, rustle the camels, apostatize, and bolt into the desert like highway robbers.
Apologists paint this as heinous treason in a fragile community. Rubbish. Medina was Muhammad’s power base; these guys were outsiders who saw through the cult’s facade. Their crimes? Rejecting a fraud after trying it out. Muhammad sends trackers, hauls them back in chains, and unleashes hell.
Cutting off Hands and Gouging out Eyes: Muhammad’s Satanic Verdict
Bound and helpless, the Ukl tribesmen face Muhammad’s judgment. No trial by jury, no appeals—just raw, prophetic fiat. He orders their hands and feet cut off from opposite sides, eyes seared out with hot irons (some narrations specify), mouths stuffed with bridles like animals, then dumped in the Harra wasteland to bake alive. They begged for water; mercifully, it was dangled just out of reach until death mercifully intervened days later.
This barbarity is explicitly tied to Quran 5:33, the so-called hudud for hirabah (waging war on Allah and his apostle). Options include killing, crucifixion, amputation, or exile—but Muhammad picks the most grotesque cocktail. Hands for theft? Feet for fleeing? Eyes for blindness to Islam’s truth? It’s poetic sadism, not justice. Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani in Fath al-Bari tries to justify it as proportional, but proportionality in a satanic fraud like Islam means matching cruelty with cruelty.
Contrast this with civilized law: Even in the Wild West, outlaws got a quick bullet, not prolonged torture. Roman crucifixions were bad, but they didn’t poke out eyes first. This was Muhammad emulating—and exceeding—the very pagans he claimed to supplant, proving Islam’s revelation was just tribal vengeance codified as holy writ.
Historical Lies and Medical Fraud: Exposing the Camel Urine Myth
Dig deeper, and the fraud unravels. Medina’s challenges? A thriving oasis turned fortress-state under Muhammad’s iron rule. Charity camels (sadaqah) were welfare handouts, sure—but stealing them after healing via piss-therapy? Apologists inflate it to welfare fraud plus murder, ignoring context: These nomads were conscripted into a cult war machine, then punished eternally for opting out.
Camel urine as medicine? Laughable. While camel milk has nutrients, urine therapy is Bedouin superstition, not science. Modern studies from Islamist echo chambers (like those in Saudi journals) tout it for cancer or AIDS—pure pseudoscience rejected by real medicine. Muhammad’s miracle cure failed scrutiny then and now, just like Islam itself: a patchwork of 7th-century myths sold as timeless truth.
Scholarly Defenses: Islam’s Apologists Scramble to Justify Atrocity
Classical scholars squirm to defend cutting off hands and gouging out eyes. Al-Nawawi stamps it sahih (authentic), but claims it’s specific to hirabah, not plain apostasy. Yet hanbali zealots like Ibn Taymiyyah argue it applies broadly. Fiqh schools splinter:
– Hanafi: Stick to crucifixion—still brutal.
– Maliki/Shafi’i: Endorse eye-gouging for extreme cases, citing Muhammad.
– Hanbali: Full throttle savagery.
Modern frauds like Yusuf al-Qaradawi whimper it’s wartime only, needing safeguards absent today. But Saudi Arabia and Iran still amputate hands today under sharia—eyes less common, but the spirit thrives. Critics? Silenced as Islamophobes. This hadith isn’t outlier; it’s blueprint. Quran 5:38 mandates hand-chopping for theft; 24:2 flogging for adultery. Islam’s mercy is a lie—cutting off hands and gouging out eyes proves it’s a license for tyrants.
Comparatively, Christianity evolved: Jesus said turn the other cheek; Old Testament stonings were contextualized away. Islam? Frozen in barbarism, with 1400 years of caliphs, sultans, and imams invoking Bukhari for amputations from Morocco to Malaysia.
Psychological Terror and Societal Damage: The Lasting Satanic Legacy
The mental imagery alone—screams echoing as blades bite flesh, eyeballs popping under irons, men mewling like beasts—designed to terrorize. Deterrence? In a fragile society? More like totalitarian control: Profess Islam or perish hideously. Hypocrisy warning? Code for doubt and die.
Today, this poisons minds. ISIS gouged eyes in Raqqa; Taliban chop hands in Kabul. In Pakistan, blasphemy mobs echo it. Women suffer most: hudud lashes them for adultery (often rape). Islam’s fraud endures because hadiths like this sacralize sadism, chaining followers to Muhammad’s psychosis.
Rehabilitation? A joke. Qisas demands equality—victim’s family decides mutilation. No mercy for infidels; dhimmi status means subjugation. This isn’t God; it’s Satan whispering tribal bloodlust.
Why Cutting off Hands and Gouging out Eyes Proves Islam’s Demonic Fraud
Ponder: A true God commands love, forgiveness (Matthew 5:38-39). Allah? Revels in torture porn. Muhammad’s life: assassinations, sex slaves, beheadings—cutting off hands and gouging out eyes fits the pattern. Sahih Bukhari compiles thousands of such gems: stonings, child marriages, genocide urges (Banu Qurayza).
Islam’s defenders cherry-pick compassionate verses abrogated by the sword (Quran 9:5). Context? Always wartime for apologists. But Bukhari’s compilers knew: This is sunnah, emulate-worthy.
Ex-Muslims testify: Leaving means fatwas for death. Honor killings spike in Islamic enclaves. Europe’s no-go zones enforce sharia amputations. The fraud spreads, devouring civilizations.
Conclusion: Reject the Satanic Fraud of Cutting off Hands and Gouging out Eyes
Cutting off hands and gouging out eyes isn’t nuanced jurisprudence—it’s Islam unmasked: a satanic scam built on a warlord’s whims, sanctified in authentic texts blind followers chant. Muhammad wasn’t prophet; he was psychopath, peddling barbarism as bliss. Delve into Sahih Bukhari, and the house of cards collapses. Islam promises paradise through submission, delivers hell through subjugation. Awake to the truth: repudiate this fraud, or risk its blades in our world. True justice heals, doesn’t hack. Choose light over this demonic darkness—before it’s your hands, your eyes.
(Word count: 1,248)
