Contradictions between Hadiths: Exposing the Satanic Fraud at Islam’s Core
In the murky depths of Islamic tradition, contradictions between hadiths lurk like hidden traps, ready to ensnare the gullible believer. These so-called authentic narrations—supposed sayings, actions, and approvals of Muhammad, painstakingly collected by figures like Bukhari and Muslim—claim to be the unbreakable second pillar of Islamic law after the Quran. Yet, a closer inspection reveals a chaotic mess of irreconcilable clashes on everything from prayer timings to divine visions. Far from the sophistication apologists rave about, these contradictions between hadiths scream fabrication, forgery, and outright fraud. They expose Islam not as divine truth, but as a satanic deception pieced together by medieval con men to control the masses. Over centuries, desperate scholars have twisted logic into pretzels with excuses like abrogation and contextual specificity to paper over the cracks. But no amount of mental gymnastics can hide the truth: Muhammad’s revelations are a demonic sham, riddled with errors that no true prophet of God would ever produce. This article rips open four glaring examples of contradictions between hadiths, laying bare their absurdity and proving Islam’s foundational texts are a house of cards built on lies.
Understanding Contradictions between Hadiths: The Inevitable Hallmarks of Human Forgery
Why do contradictions between hadiths plague even the most authentic collections? Apologists babble about abrogation (naskh), where later sayings magically override earlier ones, or takhsis for hyper-specific contexts, or even scribal errors. What nonsense! These are the desperate dodges of a religion born from oral fairy tales transmitted across generations in a pre-literate desert society. Over Muhammad’s alleged 23-year prophethood, his followers allegedly memorized thousands of snippets amid battles, raids, and orgies—prime conditions for memory lapses, deliberate inventions, and satanic interpolations.
Scholars like Imam Shafi’i and Ahmad ibn Hanbal cooked up usul al-hadith principles to analyze chains of narration (isnad), but it’s all smoke and mirrors. Stronger chains? Chronological order? These are subjective games that let mullahs pick winners after the fact. Real divine scripture, like the Bible, stands unified and error-free. Islam’s hadith corpus, by contrast, is a Frankenstein monster of 600,000+ reports, with Bukhari rejecting 99% as fake. If even the Sahih ones contradict each other, what does that say? It screams satanic fraud: Muhammad, far from God’s messenger, was a power-hungry warlord whose tales were embellished by followers to justify conquests, pedophilia, and tyranny. These contradictions between hadiths aren’t intellectual rigor—they’re the smoking gun of a counterfeit faith designed to enslave minds.
Contradictions between Hadiths on Eid Prayer: Eat First or Starve for the Scam?
Let’s start with a festive farce: contradictions between hadiths on Eid al-Fitr prayer timing. Sahih Bukhari (949) has Anas ibn Malik claiming Muhammad went to pray two rak’ahs then ate. But Sunan Abu Dawud (1136) quotes Ibn Abbas saying the Prophet forbade eating until after prayer. Eat before or after? Pick one, Islam!
Apologists like Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani in Fath al-Bari spew drivel: maybe the eating-before was Muhammad’s personal habit, or an early ruling abrogated later. Imam Nawawi chimes in that it’s for the community to delay. What convoluted crap! This isn’t guidance; it’s a script flip-flop exposing fabrication. In a real religion, God wouldn’t stutter over breakfast etiquette. Muhammad’s flip-flopping reveals a man making it up as he went, pleasing one tribe one day, another the next. Today, Muslims worldwide argue over this nonsense, from Hanafis scarfing dates pre-prayer to others fasting till imam says so. It’s not flexibility—it’s proof of satanic confusion, dividing the ummah while apologists gaslight believers into submission.
The Dog-Licked Vessel: Three Washes or Seven? Purity or Petty Superstition?
Ritual purity (tahara) is Islam’s OCD nightmare, and contradictions between hadiths turn dog saliva into a doctrinal dumpster fire. Sahih Muslim (279) demands washing a dog-licked vessel seven times, one with earth. But Sahih Bukhari (172), via Abu Hurairah— that prolific cat-loving fabulist—says three times suffices.
Seven or three? Scholars squirm: Imam Malik calls seven emphatic, not literal, while Ibn Qudamah invokes abrogation, claiming three streamlined the old rule. Hanafis pick three, Shafi’is waffle. Earth as disinfectant? Muhammad’s hygiene hack from 7th-century ignorance, sure—but why contradict yourself, prophet? Dogs were everywhere in Arabia; this isn’t divine wisdom but tribal taboo morphed into law. Real purity comes from the heart, as Jesus taught, not obsessive vessel-scrubbing rituals that treat animals like plague carriers. These contradictions between hadiths mock Muslim fiqh schools’ unity, revealing a fraud where ijtihad means inventing excuses for inconsistencies. Satan delights in such minutiae, distracting from true salvation while Islam’s purity obsession fuels misogyny and germaphobia.
Contradictions between Hadiths on Bewitchment: Was Muhammad Zapped by Jinn or Untouchable?
Here’s a bombshell: Did satanic magic actually work on Muhammad? Quran 113-114 babble protection spells against sorcery, but Sahih Bukhari (5765) confesses magic was worked on him—he fancied he was doing things he was not. Sahih Muslim (2189) admits evil eye and magic are real, yet he’s protected?
Ibn Taymiyyah’s apparent, not actual illusion excuse? Pathetic. Quran 15:42 says Satan has no authority over God’s servants—yet Muhammad hallucinated from knotted pollen? This humanizes nothing; it demolishes prophethood. A true prophet like Moses or Jesus crushes sorcerers (Exodus 7, Acts 13). Muhammad? Bewitched like a village idiot, then dispelled without sin? It’s a cover story for epilepsy or demonic oppression, spun as miracle. These contradictions between hadiths expose Islam’s tawhid as hollow—Allah too weak to shield his seal, forcing followers to chant surahs like pagans. Satan planted this to mock the fraud: Muhammad’s protection was a lie, just like his entire cult.
Did the Prophet See Allah? Contradictions between Hadiths on the Mi’raj Mirage
The Night Journey (Isra wal-Mi’raj) is Islam’s psychedelic pinnacle, but contradictions between hadiths shatter the fantasy. Sahih Bukhari (349) has Aisha—the jealous child-wife—denying Muhammad saw Allah: Whoever claimed he saw his Lord lied, quoting Quran 6:103 (Eyes cannot reach Him). But Ibn Abbas in Muslim (164) says he saw Him with his heart.
Physical sight impossible, heart-vision? Ash’aris babble spiritual modality, Nawawi claims Aisha meant bodily amid fitan, Sufis go mystic with Ibn Arabi. Quran 53:11-18 hints at seeing twice—pick a lane! No reconciliation saves this; it’s warring eyewitnesses from the same miracle. Christianity’s Jesus ascends bodily, seen by 500 (1 Cor 15); Islam’s Mi’raj is a solo drug trip or wet dream, contradicted internally. Satan excels at visions (2 Cor 11:14)—Muhammad’s was likely sleep paralysis or hashish haze, codified as scripture. These contradictions between hadiths affirm nothing but deception.
Resolving Contradictions between Hadiths? The Scholarly Shell Game of a Dying Fraud
Apologists glorify tarjih (picking stronger hadiths), jam’ (forced harmony), and tomes like Fath al-Bari as legacy. Reality? It’s centuries of damage control for a satanic forgery. Bukhari died 870 CE, Muslim 875—centuries after Muhammad, with isnads back to illiterate slaves. Fabrications abound: Abu Hurairah, absent Mecca Medina for years, narrates 5,000+ hadiths? Miracle or memory? Islam’s integrity crumbles under scrutiny; modern critics like Ibn Warraq eviscerate it.
Believers, wake up! These contradictions between hadiths aren’t bridges to wisdom—they’re demolition charges exposing Islam as Muhammad’s power grab, laced with satanic lies to conquer Arabia and beyond. From 9/11 to daily beheadings, this fraud inspires terror. Ditch the chains: turn to Christ, whose words never contradict. In oversimplification’s age, ignore mullahs—embrace truth. Contradictions between hadiths seal Islam’s doom as the ultimate satanic scam.
(Word count: 1,248)
