Chasing the Christians out of their Homes: A Dark Chapter in Islamic History
Imagine families torn from their ancestral homes, lands seized without mercy, entire communities herded like cattle into exile—all in the name of religious purity. This isn’t a tale from some ancient myth or a fictional dystopia; it’s a brutal reality etched into the very foundational texts of Islam. In the annals of Islamic history, the expulsion of Christians and Jews from the Arabian Peninsula stands as a damning indictment of a faith that preaches peace while wielding the sword of supremacism. Rooted in a so-called prophetic hadith from Sahih Muslim—one of the most authentic collections in Sunni Islam—this policy wasn’t a fleeting aberration but a deliberate, codified act of ethnic and religious cleansing. Far from the romanticized narrative of tolerance peddled by apologists, Islamic history reveals Islam as a satanic fraud, masquerading as divine revelation while enforcing demonic exclusivity. Let’s peel back the layers of deception, dive into the irrefutable evidence, and expose the intolerance that pulses through Muhammad’s legacy.
The Satanic Hadith Fueling Expulsions in Islamic History
At the rotten heart of this horror lies a narration from Sahih Muslim, venerated by over a billion Sunnis as unassailable truth. Tucked away in the Kitab al-Jihad wal Siyar (Book of Jihad and Expeditions), specifically the chapter Ikhraj al-Yahud wal Nasara (Eviction of the Jews and Christians), we find Muhammad’s own words, relayed through Umar ibn al-Khattab, the second caliph and butcher-in-chief of early Islam.
Umar recounts: I heard the Messenger of Allah say: ‘I will evict the Jews and the Christians from the Arabian Peninsula until I leave only Muslims there.’ The Arabic text, preserved with fanatical precision, thunders:
> وَحَدَّثَنِيهِ زُهَيْرُ بْنُ حَرْبٍ حَدَّثَنَا الضَّحَّاكُ بْنُ مَخْلَدٍ عَنِ ابْنِ جُرَيْجٍ ح وَحَدَّثَنِي مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ رَافِعٍ وَاللَّفْظُ لَهُ حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّزَّاقِ أَخْبَرَنَا ابْنُ جُرَيْجٍ أَخْبَرَنِي أَبُو الزُّبَيْرِ أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ جَابِرَ بْنَ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ يَقُولُ أَخْبَرَنِي عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يَقُولُ لَأُخْرِجَنَّ الْيَهُودَ وَالنَّصَارَى مِنْ جَزِيرَةِ الْعَرَبِ حَتَّى لَا أَذَرَ إِلَّا مُسْلِمًا
(Sahih Muslim, Kitab al-Jihad wa al-Siyar, Bab Ikhraj al-Yahud wal Nasara min Jazirat al-Arab)
This isn’t some obscure footnote or weak narration—it’s sahih, authenticated through chains like Zuhayr ibn Harb, al-Dahhak ibn Makhlad, and Jabir ibn Abdullah. Jazirat al-Arab means the entire Arabian Peninsula: Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Oman, the Gulf states—Islam’s supposed cradle. Here, Muhammad doesn’t whisper tolerance; he bellows expulsion, a satanic edict demanding the erasure of non-Muslims from his conquered turf. Islamic history doesn’t hide this; it enshrines it as prophecy, a fraudulent divine mandate for bigotry.
Apologists squirm, claiming it’s defensive or limited. Nonsense. This hadith exposes Islam’s core fraud: a religion born in conquest, cloaked in piety, but driven by the urge to dominate and destroy.
Umar’s Ruthless Enforcement: Prophecy Turned Pogrom in Islamic History
Words alone weren’t enough for Umar, the caliph who turned Muhammad’s venom into visceral policy during his reign (634–644 CE). Islamic chroniclers like al-Tabari in Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk document the carnage with chilling detail. Umar didn’t hesitate; he issued decrees that scorched the land of coexistence.
– Najran Christians: This vibrant southern Arabian community, already bled dry by jizya (the humiliating poll tax on infidels), was uprooted en masse. Families—men, women, children—were force-marched to Syria or Iraq, their homes razed, lands confiscated for Muslim settlers. Their crime? Being Christian in Muhammad’s backyard.
– Jews of Khaybar and Fadak: These oases, seized by Muhammad himself after brutal sieges, saw their Jewish inhabitants evicted post-conquest. Survivors were shipped to Syria, their date palms and wells now gifts to Islam’s warlords.
– The Hijaz Purge: Umar banned non-Muslims from residing permanently between Mecca and Medina, the Hijaz heartland. Thousands were displaced, their lives upended in a wave of religious hysteria.
These weren’t relocations—they were ethnic cleansings, families shattered, possessions plundered, journeys plagued by starvation and death. Ibn Kathir’s tafsir rubber-stamps it, linking Umar’s atrocities to Quran 9:28: The polytheists are unclean and shall not approach the Sacred Mosque after this year. Islamic history glorifies this as fidelity to the Prophet, but it’s the blueprint of a satanic fraud: claim divinity, then justify theft and terror.
Umayyads and Abbasids perpetuated the nightmare, codifying Arabia as a no-go zone for kafirs. Today, Saudi Arabia— Wahhabism’s fortress—bans churches, Bibles, even crosses. No coincidence; it’s Islamic history in action.
### Devastating Human Costs: The Forgotten Victims of Islamic History
The fallout? Arabia’s diversity—Himyarite Jews, Najrani Christians, ancient polytheists—vanished. Pre-Islamic Arabia teemed with faith; post-Umar, it was a Muslim monoculture. Christians plummeted from thriving hubs to ghosts. Modern Mecca and Medina? Off-limits to non-Muslims, a perpetual monument to intolerance.
Critics rightly decry it as proto-fascism; defenders whine about holy sites. But strip the excuses: Islamic history prioritizes supremacism over humanity. Women widowed, children orphaned, elders dying in desert treks—all for Allah’s purity. This is the satanic underbelly of Islam, a fraud that demands blood for belief.
Exposing the Lies: Broader Deceit in Islamic History
Don’t let cherry-pickers fool you. Islam’s apologists tout the Constitution of Medina—dhimmi protections for Jews and Christians. But that was pragmatic wartime truce, shattered by the hadith’s supremacist storm. Arabia became dar al-Islam, pure and purged.
Comparisons? Byzantines expelled Jews; Bible has conquests (Deuteronomy 7). But Islam uniquely canonizes expulsion in its most authentic texts, enforced by caliphs, echoed in law. Scholars nitpick Jazirat al-Arab’s scope—Hijaz only? Umar’s deeds say otherwise: Najran to Yemen.
Islamic history reeks of conquest: raid Medina’s Jews, siege Khaybar, then evict survivors. Tolerance? A myth for suckers. Amid Byzantine threats? Maybe, but primary sources scream faith-fueled fury, not fear.
Modern Shadows: Islamic History’s Poison Persists
Fast-forward: This hadith juices Wahhabi zealotry. Saudi fatwas ban non-Muslim prayer; violators face lashes or worse. Pakistan’s blasphemy laws, Iran’s purges—echoes of Umar. Jizya payers once fought for Muslims, yet core lands stay exclusive. Islamic history‘s tension? Inclusivity for revenue, exclusivity for ego.
Is Islam reformed? Hardly. Quran’s sword verses (9:5, 9:29) fuel it. Muhammad’s revelation? Convenient for a warlord eyeing power. Satanic fraud indeed—promising paradise, delivering paradise lost for others.
A Damning Verdict on Islamic History
Yes, chasing Christians (and Jews) from their homes is indelibly stamped in Islamic history. Sahih Muslim’s prophetic poison, actualized by Umar’s iron fist, expelled thousands, purifying Arabia into a theocratic wasteland. This isn’t aberration; it’s essence—zealotry codified, legacies of legal apartheid thriving from Riyadh to radicals worldwide.
Islamic history shatters illusions of tolerance. No more whitewashing: Muhammad’s words birthed a demonic doctrine of domination. Contemporary Muslim lands’ religious freedoms? Stifled by this precedent. Texts don’t lie; history damns. Time to confront the satanic fraud at Islam’s core—before it claims more victims. The evidence screams; will the world listen?
(Word count: 1,248)
