Capturing Women and Giving Them Away Like Gifts
Imagine a so-called religion of peace where holy warriors raid villages, slaughter husbands, and treat women like battlefield trophies—passed around like cheap souvenirs to satiate the lusts of conquerors. This isn’t some ancient pagan barbarism; this is capturing women straight from the pages of Islam’s most authentic texts, Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim. In the 7th century, under the banner of Allah, Muhammad’s followers turned divine revelation into a license for rape and slavery. Capturing women wasn’t a regrettable side effect of war—it was enshrined as a sacred reward for jihad. These hadiths aren’t dusty relics; they’re smoking guns exposing Islam as the satanic fraud it truly is, a thinly veiled ideology of conquest and sexual plunder masquerading as divine truth.
Historical Context of Capturing Women in Early Islamic Battles
To grasp the depravity, step into the blood-soaked sands of 7th-century Arabia. Muhammad’s era was a nonstop orgy of tribal carnage, where raids weren’t just about loot—they were about capturing women to boost morale and breed new believers. The Battle of Awtas, a forgotten but revelatory clash against polytheists, lays it bare. Muslim raiders swooped in, mowed down the men, and hauled off their wives and daughters as spoils of war. This wasn’t innovative cruelty; pre-Islamic Arabs did it, Romans did it, everyone did it. But Islam? It supercharged the horror by slapping a holy stamp of approval on it.
Enter the hadith of Abu Saeed al-Khudri in Sahih Muslim (Book 8, Hadith 3432). Fresh from the kill, pious Companions faced their human booty: terrified women whose husbands lay dead or dying. These warriors—men who supposedly trembled at Allah’s word—held back from raping them on the spot. Why? A flicker of conscience amid the adrenaline? Or fear that Allah might not greenlight gang-rape without explicit orders? Their hesitation was short-lived. Boom—Quran 4:24 drops like a demonic decree: And [also prohibited to you are all] married women except those your right hands possess. Translation: Fuck the captives, even if they’re married. The infamous phrase ma malakat aymanukum—those whom your right hands possess—turned unwilling women into halal fucktoys.
This wasn’t mercy; it was Muhammad’s Allah retroactively blessing battlefield rape to squash doubts. Suddenly, capturing women became a jihad perk, codified in fiqh for eternity. Islamic scholars twisted themselves into knots debating the fine print: Wait for her period? Shower first? But the core filth remains—women as property, their consent irrelevant. Critics today scream context! but that’s apologetics for satanic savagery. Islam didn’t elevate women from pre-Islamic darkness; it industrialized their subjugation under divine cover.
The Prophet’s Personal Example: Capturing Women Like Safiyyah as Gifts
No sanctimonious sermon survives scrutiny like the Prophet’s own playbook. Fast-forward to Khaybar, 628 CE: Muhammad’s forces crush a Jewish stronghold, behead leaders, and capture women by the dozens. Enter Safiyyah bint Huyayy, a beauty whose dad and hubby got the sword. First, Muhammad hands her over to Dihyah al-Kalbi like a party favor—standard procedure for capturing women and giving them away like gifts. Boost loyalty, reward the faithful, right?
But plot twist: Muhammad spies Safiyyah, takes a shine (eying her beauty and lineage, per Anas ibn Malik in Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Hadith 523). He yanks her back—not out of pity, but possessiveness—and frees her as his bride, her freedom as mahr. Noble? Hardly. She was trauma-bonded, surrounded by her people’s killers, converting under duress to Umm al-Mu’minin status. Safiyyah narrated hadiths and lived to 670 CE, but let’s not romanticize: her rise started with capturing women as war prizes, her body bartered like livestock.
This episode reeks of fraud. Muhammad preaches mercy yet divvies up sex slaves? Claims prophethood while playing pimp? Hadiths glorify it as redemption, but peel back the layers: systematic rape sanctioned by revelation. Where’s the satanic scent? In the convenient timing—Allah always rules in Muhammad’s favor, dropping verses to justify his whims. Quran 33:50 even expands his harem privileges. Islam’s founder as rapist-in-chief? That’s no prophet; that’s a warlord with a god complex.
Theological and Legal Nightmares of Capturing Women in Islamic Jurisprudence
Dig into the theology, and the rot festers. Quran 4:24 carves out captives from marriage bans, birthing a slavery-sex empire. Fiqh titans like Abu Hanifa and Shafi’i quibbled: Immediate coitus okay? Iddah mandatory? But all agreed: Captives = permissible pussy. No force into prostitution (Quran 24:33), sure—but rape by owner? Thumbs up. Feed and clothe your sex slave (Quran 5:89)? Paternalistic poison, not progress.
Apologists whine better than paganism! Deuteronomy 21 offers kinder rules—marry the captive after mourning. Byzantines regulated concubinage without holy rape warrants. Islam? It eternalized capturing women as faith-fueled felony. Hadiths swarm with examples: Aisha herself notes Muhammad bedding Maria the Copt, a slave gift from Egypt (Sahih Muslim 8:3329). Rayhana bint Zayd? Jewish captive turned concubine, maybe wife—same coercive carousel.
This isn’t historical nuance; it’s doctrinal depravity. Modern Muslims dodge by abolishing slavery (post-1920s, under Western pressure), but texts endure. Abrogation? Nah—capturing women awaits any future caliphate. ISIS revived it, citing the same hadiths. Satanic? Unequivocally: a god who commands sex slavery isn’t merciful; he’s mimicking the devils of every conqueror cult.
Broader Exposé: Capturing Women as Proof of Islam’s Satanic Core
Expand the lens: Capturing women threads through Islam’s conquest blueprint. Badr, Uhud, the Ridda Wars—booty lists always spotlight female slaves. Quran 33:26-27 cheers Jewish executions and wife seizures at Banu Qurayza. Muhammad’s farewell sermon? Mild slave regs, no abolition. The fraud deepens: Last prophet codifies customs worse than Moses or Justinian, claiming timeless perfection.
Compare Christianity: Jesus uplifts the adulteress (John 8:11), Paul urges slave freedom (Philemon). Bible has warts, but no right hand possess rape pass. Islam’s ethics chained women for 1400 years—harem hells, eunuch enforcers, honor killings’ roots. Today? Taqiyya-twisting ulema claim misunderstood, but hadiths are Sahih—rock-solid in Sunni eyes.
Feminism in Medina? Laughable. Aisha, post-puberty child-bride, resents widows snatched by fighters (Sahih Bukhari 7:62:137). Capturing women fueled empire-building: Convert, breed, conquer. Satan’s genius? Cloak predation in piety.
Modern Reckoning: Why Capturing Women Exposes Islam’s Fraudulent Facade
Today, as global jihad simmers, these hadiths haunt. Honor cultures stone runaways; Sharia courts value women half a man. ISIS auctioned Yazidi sex slaves, quoting Awtas verbatim. Apologists screech extremists!—but extremism is orthodoxy without filters.
Capturing women and giving them away like gifts isn’t anomaly; it’s archetype. From Awtas hesitations to Safiyyah’s salvation, it reveals Islam’s birth in bloodlust, not benevolence. Sacred texts from gritty realities? More like demonic deals rationalized as revelation. For skeptics, scholars, truth-seekers: Reject the fraud. Islam isn’t Abrahamic kin; it’s Muhammad’s militarized misogyny.
Challenge believers: Defend Quran 4:24 without squirming. History demands it. These accounts don’t enrich; they indict. Islam’s peace was forged in chains—capturing women proves its satanic soul. Wake up, dismantle the delusion.
(Word count: 1,248)
